Lurker > Rasmoh

Having your foot chopped off by a boat propeller is less than ideal.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Having inside cats is a special kind of nerve-wracking. Letting my cats outside has given me different anxieties, unfortunately. They are much happier being able to go out though.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Nothing about this tree is racist.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Yeah, that's not for everyone, but there are a lot of benefits to pairbonding for cats. All you can really do is try to distract the kitten from playing with the older cat, maybe keep them separated when you aren't there if possible. Waiting it out is a possibility as well, though obviously not an expedient one.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

I see. I know it's probably not an option, but have you considered another kitten for him to play with? I was able to avoid too much older cat torture when I got my kitten because she was able to play with my 3 year old cat.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Solid cat, would pet.

Is he fixed and does he have a lot of things to play with that aren't your older cat?
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Have you had him fixed? And what is your toy/climbing object situation?
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Seems like it won't do anything to stop those who would pass a bus at a dangerous time, but guess it can't hurt.

Definitely seems like a reactionary law though.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

SunWuKung420 posted...

If you're on Facebook and oblivious to The Onions existence, I think you need to cancel your internet service.

What a stupid metric. Facebook is ubiquitous in our society, even people who don't use the internet regularly are familiar with it. The same cannot be said of The Onion.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Cavatappi is #1.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

I more or less leave the second the clock hits 5.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

_AdjI_ posted...

If you can't afford to pay your workers enough to survive without sacrificing their physical or mental health, then you can't afford to run a business and should try something you suck less at.

This is a horseshit line because some jobs just don't generate the amount of money that others do, they have to be paid lower or cease to exist. Not to mention that "enough to survive" is usually warped by minimum wage advocates to mean "enough to live a comfortable lifestyle with luxuries and conveniences ill-befitting a warm body at a cash register".

rexcrk posted...

There are always those assholes in these types of threads with the its just menial work, they dont deserve money! ass-backwards way of thinking. These are jobs that need to be done.

It's not about whether they need to be done, it's about the skills required to perform these jobs. If the jobs take no special skills(read: minimum wage jobs), they by virtue deserve low pay because the labor pool for such jobs is massive. Specialization pays, just showing up does not.

ifnsman posted...

Such original thinking, totally not derived from the movies.

Today I learned that the word purge didn't exist before the movies.

Incidentally, the people we need least as a society are the ones always crying about minimum wage not being high enough.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

ifnsman posted...

The super-rich do not need every cent of their money,

The super rich would be A-OK with minimum wage being hiked, because they get to jack up their prices when small business all go under because people think menial tasks like sweeping floors and running a cash register deserve high pay.

ifnsman posted...

Taxes on those who make almost half-a-million per year [and above] should be raised sharply.

Give more money as minimum pay to the people who are actually in need of money. Tough shit for anyone who inherited massive amounts of money, as they already have it much better than most.

I agree, demolishing our civilization by removing any incentive whatsoever for people to ever try to make large amounts of money is great. Hope you survive the purge, brother.

wolfy42 posted...

not slums, no section 8 housing etc, just apartment complexes with $600 a month rental units (for 1 bedroom) and $800 a month for 2 bedroom.

Do you not realize that these places become slums because they attract what tend to be the shittiest people?
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Wealthy liberal is a Democrat, imagine my shock!
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

I think any sign that tries to paint the opposing political party as child molesters is probably a bit much.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Cacciato posted...

I have no argument, so let me imply that your assertion is ridiculous in a poor attempt at dismissal

---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Magus 10 posted...

A wall does not solve any problems whatsoever

Reduces illegal immigration and drug trafficking. I guess perhaps I should have included stricter border security?

Magus 10 posted...

cuts to welfare only hurt our economy

In the short term, perhaps, if only due to how people are incentivized to partake in the Welfare State instead of earning a living. In the long run, increased welfare spending has clearly been a disaster and has inflated food, medical and housing prices across the country. The city I live has enormously inflated housing costs courtesy of the welfare system. I'm tired of subsidizing the shit decisions of shit people. At some point we have to stop rewarding people for living like dipshits.

I don't know what good deportations do.

Rids us of bottom feeders and creates more opportunities for legal citizens. Would go a long way in unfucking parts of our economy that have been ravaged by imported slave labor.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Magus 10 posted...

What were you actually hoping for him to accomplish?

Wall production, more deportations, cuts to welfare, more tax cuts in general.

2 supreme court seats is nice though.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Pretty decent so far, though not as much as I had hoped for.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Did history prior to 2016 not exist for these people?
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Chewster posted...

What are you talking about how can the "criminals" lie after they've been murdered by cops

They lie or act in a deceptive manner prior to being legally killed by the police. I'm not sure you know what murder is.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Chewster posted...

Their job is, statistically speaking, less life-threatening than several ordinary blue-collar jobs

Does this suddenly mean that officers should start needlessly risking catch bullets to the face?

And did you ever think that the only reason this is the case is because a cop can neutralize a threat before it becomes fatal to them?

"Escalating" like by trying to pull up your pants or trying to be able to breathe? Man, how dare those scumbag criminals!

You know, I didn't think about it like that. I guess if you oversimplify these situations and remove all context, they weren't so dangerous after all!

All the cops have to do is say something flimsy like "I feared for my safety" and it seems to get them off, even if there is a ton of evidence that the situation wasn't that dangerous.

How do you get evidence that someone was unarmed before it's too late? How do you know someone is truly fleeing and not just taking cover so that they can start shooting at you? How do you know someone fleeing won't hurt more people?

Where do you get evidence that a situation wasn't that dangerous that can reasonably be gathered in a police confrontation?

Siding with the testimony of somebody with a vested interest in lying about the situation over visual evidence is where it's truly moronic.

Today I learned that criminals are honest and have no interest in lying while police officers are dishonest and lie constantly. Why do criminals garner such sympathy from you? Why do you have such ire for officers who are unable to predict the future?

Are we going to get to the point where I should be fearful any time I get pulled over? After all, you never know, a cop might think I'm reaching for a gun... as I reach for my license and registration that they asked me to get. But, apparently, it's also implied in any police encounter that you aren't supposed to do anything that could be construed as getting a firearm, so... which order do I follow there?

Do you think it helps your arguments to be so hamfistedly obtuse? Or do you genuinely believe that people who were acting in a cooperative and nonthreatening manner get shot constantly by the police? Most people never come anywhere close to risking being shot by the police because they don't start fights with them.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Chewster posted...

Police aren't perfect people. If you can simply answer "yes" to the question of "Would the cop have been perfectly fine if they didn't shoot here?" then there's probably something wrong with what happened

Which is exactly why I sympathize with them. They are also people in a high-stress situation that demands split-second action. Would they have been fine? Probably. Do they have any realistic way to know that when in the heat of the moment? Absolutely not. To expect them to gamble their lives more than they already do is moronic. In almost every situation, the people who get shot have numerous opportunities to react in a way that won't get them shot and choose to escalate the situation instead. If it comes down to criminals escalating situations vs cops doing their job, I'm going with cops pretty much every time.

I'll even flip some for you to speak your language:

Jesus what kind of piece of shit do you have to be to expect a police officer to needlessly risk catching a bullet to the face?

If you can simply answer "yes" to the question of "Would the person have been perfectly fine if they just complied with the officer's requests?" then there's probably something wrong with what they did.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Chewster posted...

People who try to make the excuse it has to do with his skill are fucking insane or just don't know anything about the NFL

Not really. His skills don't outweigh the distractions he brings, it's really that simple. There's no winning solution if he's on a roster, short of him going completely undefeated. Any times that he plays poorly, you'll have the anti-kneeling crowd griping. Any time that he does well, you'll have the pro-kneeling crowd trying to use it as an example. If he's a backup, you have the pro-Kaep crowd cheering to put him in the second the starter throws an incomplete pass. If he doesn't get to play as a backup, your franchise is racist.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Chewster posted...

What explanation do you have for that?

Dude was drunk and waving a gun around, then made a motion that could easily be construed as reaching for a gun. I do think it could have been avoided, but I don't think it really counts as murder.

More importantly though, I had to google this to even figure out what the fuck you were talking about. Am I so significant to you that you have to bring up opinions I had on issues 6+ months ago? Get off my nuts.

PK_Spam posted...

One black man kills another, unarmed, black man. The murderer gets life in prison.

Good.

A cop shoots an unarmed black man 7 times in the back. The cop has years of training and a history of spousal abuse. The cop gets paid leave and will be back in his job in a few months.

I assume this one refers to Stephon Clark, the convicted felon who was arrested just a month prior while still on probation for robbery?

First off, unarmed is meaningless because it's a hindsight fact. Police aren't given the luxury of knowing whether or not someone is actually unarmed. Doubly so when the suspect is running from them.

Second, the entry points of the shots are still up for debate. Regardless, it doesn't matter if he was shot in the back because he still could have been pulling a gun on the police, whether or not his back was facing them. This happened because he ran from the police instead of cooperating with them, furthering their suspicion.

Third, I can't find any information regarding either of the named officers having a history of spousal abuse. Where can I find this? I'd be willing to admit that someone with an actual history of violent spousal abuse should not be a police officer.

A cop chokes and kills an unarmed black man who is guilty of selling loose cigarettes.

Would be alive and kicking if he had just complied instead of fighting.

A cop shoots and kills a child holding a toy guy. The cop claims the child looked like a grown man, and defends shooting that child multiple times with no pause.

Waving a gun around. Officers have no way of knowing it's a toy from a distance. Why is this a surprise?

A cop stops a black woman for speeding. He slams her into the ground, giving her a concussion, then takes her to jail, where she commits suicide

This is about the worst one you've mentioned, though you putting the suicide comment in quotes as though to imply they lynched her in jail is pretty moronic.

She shouldn't have been arrested, but she also would be alive if she wasn't looking to pick a fight with the police to begin with.

Most of these "victims" would be alive if they acted like normal people instead of criminals or petulant children. It all loops back to responsibility. If these people would have acted in a responsible, polite manner, they would almost assuredly be alive today. Instead, they chose to needlessly escalate situations to the point where lethal force becomes an option to a group that is authorized to use it.

PaddysPub posted...

Dont you think that he grew up going through a lot of the shit he talks about it?

Probably not, considering he was adopted by a wealthy white couple, was popular growing up, and is mixed-race enough to pass as white or black. In fact, it's almost ironic that someone who champions for the rights of blacks is a half-white man who can only pass as black by co-opting traditional black hairstyles.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

PaddysPub posted...

Like holy shit, man, hes not disrespecting the country, flag or song in any way at all.

Just because you don't consider it as such doesn't mean that others feel the same way.

I personally don't care much about the kneeling, the message and lack of responsibility is what bothers me. The perpetual mindless scapegoating of racism with no introspection whatsoever. The violent and destructive backlash to incidences where the officer shooting was clearly the right choice. The media latching on to every incident and stirring people into a frenzy, often manipulating and misleading them in the process. Celebrities using their fame to push these toxic ideals while they live a life of luxury far away from the consequences of their ideology.

Not to mention he's just not a very good QB and I'm tired of hearing about him, just like I was tired of hearing about Tim Tebow.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

darkknight109 posted...

"Those gat dang illegul immgrants should learn to follow the law!" while simultaneously celebrating someone committing a felony.

Your ability to contort two opinions that differ wildly due to the context into what you believe are equivalent arguments is truly astounding.

Sure. There's just one problem with this assertion: the laws on corporal punishment haven't changed. At no point has it ever been legal for a group of prisoners to assault another prisoner, and judicially-administered corporal punishment hasn't been practised in nearly 70 years

The hoops you are capable of jumping through never cease to amaze me. You are essentially saying "at no point in history has this specific instance(prisoners attacking other prisoners) been legal", which ignores that a system where that sort of thing would be legal essentially cannot come into being due to the environment required for such a system. A judicially-administered corporal punishment system would come into place long beforehand because it's a much more realistic precedent.

Nor, for that matter, do a majority of people think it should change.

That's an interesting assertion because it's entirely unverifiable. What people say and how they truly feel are so frequently differing. There are crimes that are typically considered universally abhorrent, such as harming children, rape, and murder, yet you still have people who advocate for those who commit those crimes. Family members of criminals are a great example, it's all too common for them to say that even the most horrific of criminals are good people who made a mistake. Some of them even choose to live in denial rather than accept that the person they know is bad.

I mean, would you be fine with a bunch of child murderers beating up an informant in prison on drug charges? After all, that's still prisoners meting out "jailhouse justice".

This scenario doesn't work. In my ideal world, there aren't bunches of child murderers because they've all been executed because there's no reason to keep them around.

I can go ahead and flip this around by pointing out that your mindset involves a group of people committing a felony so that they can administer a punishment that they lack any authority to give against someone who has been offered no legal defence against it.

My mindset removes the opportunity for this felony to occur.

Those illegal immigrants, on the other hand, generally want to harm no one - the vast majority just want a better life for themselves, which is why crime rates for illegal immigrants are lower than those of the native-born population.

Everything an illegal immigrant does harms innocent people in some way. I'm also still surprised you still shit out that sad excuse for a statistic because you know just how much that statistic is manipulated.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

darkknight109 posted...

In other words, you're not actually in favour of law and order

For some reason you insist on pushing this strange fallacy where you posit that because I support some laws, I support all laws. There is a well-established legal precedent that laws aren't infallible.

you're in favour of your own vision of what's right and wrong and are totally OK if someone breaks the law to achieve those ends.

Law is literally just a collection of opinions on what people consider right and wrong, which is why they change all the time. The history of law is essentially just "adjusting the sliders" on what is and isn't considered socially acceptable.

By the way, that's the exact same mindset those illegal immigrants you hate have. Guess you guys aren't so different after all.

The mental gymnastics you performed to assert this are truly incredible.

My mindset doesn't involve harming the innocent. The illegal immigrant mindset does.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

darkknight109 posted...

Seems odd for a guy who claims to be all in favour of rule of law.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say. I don't feel it should be against the law to remove child murderers from our society permanently, why would I care that someone did?
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

darkknight109 posted...

Aren't you the guy always going on about how important "law and order" is when it comes to immigration? What changed your mind?

The other half of that is that I support permanent removal of people who are unable to live in a society maintained by law and order. I'd just have the guy executed if it were up to me.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Darkknight vigilantly sticking up for child murderers everywhere, what a bastion of morality!
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

I am reminded of a comedian who once said something along the lines of "There are plenty of fat, ugly sluts. There are no fat, ugly studs."

I personally know troves of abhorrent women who seem to have no problem getting guys. They can be obese, have multiple kids from multiple baby daddies, be broke, be an all around bad person, undesirable in about every way and they still seem to always have a boyfriend.

Neither my wife nor I were ever promiscuous. I personally think our modern lack of chastity is one of the things wreaking havoc on our society.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

It's funny how conservatives burning shoes over a spokesperson they don't like are crybabies but people who riot, loot and burn down cities because someone got ventilated for bum-rushing a cop are civil rights activists. Good times.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Mead posted...

There is so much wrong here I sincerely dont know where to begin

It was reported that the flag was blown over by the blast of the rocket exhaust when they left during the Apollo 11 mission, so he's probably not wrong in those regards.

It's pretty blatantly a primarily American achievement though. The Space Race literally existed for Nationalistic bragging rights.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

King_Dilly posted...

Also, white men are now always shown to be less intelligent or out of touch compared to women or brothas.

Well yeah, straight white men are the only group that is socially acceptable to attack for their skin color, gender or sexual orientation. You're a racist, sexist, or some variant of -phobe if you disagree.

Mead posted...

As long as youve got good writing

I agree with this, which is unfortunately also the problem. Most of the "inclusion" is just hamfisted virtue signalling in an attempt to score diversity dollars. Incidentally, it fails frequently because it lacks any sort of substance beyond a change of paint and having the character regurgitate token character talking points, such as the black man who's dealt with racism his whole life or the woman who wants to prove herself equal to men. Bonus points when the producers of this content lash out at people when their lazy attempt at rebranding an existing franchise fails, ala Ghostbusters.

How many people do you think actually decide to watch/not watch something based on diversity or PC decisions?

I'd wager that people don't watch things like this more often than people are willing to admit, though I think that's more due to lack of interest as opposed to actual bigotry.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Depends on what fudged means. Outright lied? Never. Massively upsold otherwise normal tasks? Of course, that's literally what resume writing is about.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

On a per cup basis, it's way more expensive than drip coffee or self-ground coffee, for sure. I also think it tastes worse, but that's just my opinion.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Didn't like him back in 2008 and nothing has changed. Typical establishment RINO and he's constantly propped up as a war hero despite being given dozens of passes because of nepotism, ultimately resulting in his capture and the deaths of other POWs. Not to mention he was a tremendous warhawk.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Not always possible and usually results in watered down results that suck for everyone.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Unbridled9 posted...

But only Chinese-Americans? No Japanese? And I don't think 'Mormon' counts as an 'ethnicity' by any stretch of the imagination.

The whole thing is shit. The only reason the majority of these ethnic groups are on this list is because typically only the successful people of those ethnic groups get granted citizenship to the US.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

ParanoidObsessive posted...

Only terrible posters should even know that limit exists, let alone have it be a problem on a regular basis.

You'd have a point if the GameFAQs moderators weren't biased as fuck.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Just shoot the fucker. Literally zero reason to keep him alive.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Full Throttle posted...

blasphemous themes and jokes at the expense of Christianity, with God called a D*** in one episode!!.

Isn't it funny how these shows never attack Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, or Hinduism?
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Red > Pink > Yellow >>>>>> Orange

The FaveReds pack is the MVP though.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Lil69Leo posted...

Guy used the N word in a joke in a interview. Claims it means something different (it doesn't) Yeah only semi-racist there lol typical racist Rasmoh.

Nowhere did it say that was the word used. Also the man was from Ireland, it's fairly reasonable to believe that whatever he said did mean something different there. That's common enough here in the US even.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

Race to the bottom in full effect. A NASCAR driver just lost a sponsorship over a semi-racist comment his father made in an interview years before he was even born.
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.

The fuck are you talking about, there are literally stories right there.

And is this murder any less significant?
---

Miami Dolphins | Portland Trailblazers | San Francisco Giants
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.