Lurker > RazorX2003

Who will win the human race?

Whoever is the fascist.

Am i a racist? Depends on which definition you are using. Yes i know, there's really only one, but unfortunately the education system, television/film/news, and the ability to share lies on social media, has a large percentage of the population believing racism is just a white people thing or anything that isn't supportive of liberalism/socialism. I don't consider myself racist in the sense that, i don't judge people by the group the racial group they belong to, i judge people by their individual character. But sometimes we have to speak about the groups as a whole, whether we like it or not, and if the collectivizing of the left is ok for them to do, then everyone else has the right to do it too and if they have a problem with that then they are nothing but hypocrites.
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

It's probably all the tweaks in their algorithms to try and hide content by making it harder to find
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

I dunno, where's the swimsuit pics?

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BQucUI8JLLM/maxresdefault.jpg
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

I think he's been doing excellent for a guy that supposedly isn't qualified for the job at all. Im impressed with how much he's actually getting done, liking those things or not. I'm definitely glad he has been sticking it all the fake news organizations in the mainstream and all the people who spread lies about him being in collusion with Russia, they got that one backwards! I don't love everything he's done but in hindsight some of his more questionable actions sometimes seem to later appear to have been stratetgic, making the best of a complicated situation for example, or whatever the case
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

How about we just get the right to design, build, and tinker, with our own custom algorithms instead of having Google decide what content we should be shown. That's all that needs to happen. Full customization. Freedom. I want to know why im being shown the results i see and be able to adjust the "learning" parameters so that i can visit and explore things that i don't necessarily care to see a second time without it being pushed in my face. These algorithms they use are marketed as a benefit to us because they tailor the delivered experience by guessing what we want to see by what we've seen before. This does nothing but create an echo chamber and box you into content that confirms all your biases and stifles your expansion as a person. The internet is a key component in the movement of information and influences our beliefs about reality and what the world is like. But if something alien to you is intentionally filtering certain information from being seen by you, then it is effectively manipulating our realities so much so that it blurs the lines and distorts the possibility of finding common ground with the people we disagree with more and more0
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

Given that America is just waking up as it realizes it's being blindsided after decades of gradual communist infiltration which has been manipulating and inserting ideas and sets of emotionally charged beliefs about reality, and inevitably designed to destabilize the strength and unity (by attacking the minds of the people) that holds West (and any nation) together - leaving the door open for Russia and/or China to make moves they weren't able to in the past.

The Nazis formed to fight and resist the Communist takeover of Germany that was happening and most certainly would have happened had Hitler not risen to power. I guess my point is that if a bunch of communists start calling you Nazi's while they openly display their support for communist ideas and symbols, then resisting them naturally would play out with some similiarities to the Nazi's. It's pretty brilliant actually because they've taken advantage of the fact that the average person automatically associates Hitler and the Nazis as the worst people to have ever lived, even though they barely know a few vague details they can manage regurgitate for you. Not suggesting the Nazi's didn't do some atrocious things during their existence, but tens of millions of more people died and were killed under communist rule compared to the Nazis. But i guess because because it wasn't about race (everyone was equally likely to die) under Communism so that makes it more acceptable to some people i guess.
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

This is a question i have pondered much about... and im not sure about holding either opinion.

On the one side, if you think about the most extreme limitations we believe to be true about the universe (ie. entropy, accelerating space between things, amounts of time to travel through space, etc etc) then it would seem that there is an upper limit to what can be achieved before it inevitably falls apart.

That said, i think a number of the scientific modals that predict the unfathomably distant future and fate of the universe are merely "best guesses", crafted on the assumptions that the universe continues to follow the current model of physics and no new and unexpected emergent properties shift things into some other phase (that we can barely even try to imagine).

Also, i think that if we are able to get a handle on nanotechnology - and master it - then at that point almost nothing about the future of the universe could remain certain.
Once we integrate machine AI into biology and more specifically, into our own neural networks... and we have mastered gene editing, masted medical technology to cure all illnesses, have AR/VR accessible from within the nervous system/mind, then other than leaving the planet, it gets hard to see what else we'd come up with.

Life is fundamentally driven to survive. Thus, space travel and seeding new planets with life is an absolutely essential goal if life is to survive. The earth is inevitably doomed to either be smashed by a killshot sized meteor strike (which could happen anytime), or if not by any other means beforehand, then by the expansion of the sun before it's own death. So even the solar system will eventually become unsafe and life will be required to leave it too, at some point billions of years from now.
This goes on and on though. Thus, the ultimate problem to be solved is the problem of entropy.
After that, im not really sure what other problem would remain for technology to try and fix. Of course, plenty of new problems will arise all along the way but they'll all still be a sub problem to something greater.
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

Zeus posted...

Full Throttle posted...

His Dad, Clinton Sr is outraged as he took to Faceobok stating the staff at Book's Christian Academy telling them that his son's hairstyle is a violation.

Private school with style codes? Fair, next.

Exactly right. Private institutions don't have to accomodate people if they don't want to. There are certain rules, standards, and expectations, and in this case this kid doesn't fit in to those.

The left is so hypocritical though... People should be forced to bake gay wedding cakes for people (at places where they apparently don't even bake cakes in the first place), but it's ok for all the biggest social media organizations to coordinate together in a childish act of frustration and desperation, and suddenly mass ban popular voices who they don't like because all other efforts suppress them and us from them, have miserably failed.

They attack Christianity, they attack American people's history and culture and people, they attack European people's history and culture, they attack capitalism, they attack freedom of speech, they attack the right to defend yourself, they attack men, they attack children, they attack gender in general, they attack biology and other sciences, they attack diversity of opinion, they attack people for even associating with any person or group they don't like, with extreme verbal abuse, unreasonable offensive hate filled labels, threats of violence, and are unwilling to act in a mature fashion or engage in any effort whatsoever to have a discussion or to help the people they blindly accuse to alter their perspectives.

If they want to remove people from their platforms and organizations, fine, but it has to work both ways. If you aren't wanted you have no right to be accepted and no reason needs to be given.
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.

Tomi Lahren is the only one i don't really care for at all on that list.
---

I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant.