Lurker > ThanksUglyGod

I didn't, but you're welcome to chicken out since you have zero supporting evidence like always.

As long as he isn't treating those black patients any different than the others, sure. I don't need doctors to like me, just keep me healthy.

Some nerd shit

Ok, but why isn't it in the news?

Yeah but people feel sorry for blacks because of slavery and segregation (even though Mexicans dealt with segregation too, even though there were WHITE slaves). I think it's just because history, movies, the news all make black people out to be the victims in those cases, and no one else. Nobody mentions the Japanese facing racism and being rounded up in camps in WW2, nobodoy mentions the Native Americans having their land stolen, nobody mentions the fact that the Mexicans worked in the cotton fields as well and still do a lot of cheap labor for rich white people. In our culture, black people are the only victims because of what the media and our history books say. Because of that, black people get to play the race card, but as Latinos, we have nothing to back us up.

Well, I tried. Emotions are just too damn high in this country for logic to come home and have some dinner.

Formulating an opinion using statistics is racist, according to most here. If thats the case, then why take statistics at all? Usually people write down statistics to see what is happening, and change things with those statistics.

Have black people been mistreated over the years? Yes, but again, it was emotion that poured millions out on to the street during a pandemic, not logic.

We are saying that, according to statistics, only 9 unarmed black people were killed by cops last year (Or 13 if you include some others who have questionable weapons). 48+ cops were killed last year, and I dont know the number, but WAY more than 9 white people were killed by cops last year.

Our argument is, why the protests only when it fits a narrative? Meanwhile, Chicago is breaking records every weekend with black on black crime.

Statistics man, they dont lie, nor follow agendas. Thats the rights argument.

Was this really necessary

Because it's stupid.

No one should feel shame over doing a voice and no studio should be pressured into hiring worse voice actors out of discrimination.

If the best voice actor you got is a brown skinned dude from Scotland who the fuck cares what the skin color and birth location of the character he voices is? He can do the fucking voice.

No one cried when a black chick voiced Ashley in Mass Effect and the girl standing right next to her was voicing a blue alien. No one cried when a chick voiced Bart Simpson for 30 years.

A dog doesn't have to voice Brian, a baby doesnt have to voice Stewie, a handicapped guy doesnt have to voice Joe, a pregnant woman doesn't have to voice Bonnie. They're characters.

Live action? I can see the issue. But fucking voice work? Are you serious? You want to drop the quality of voice actors being hired for roles just based on the skin color of a performer you will never fucking see? That's madness.

It's almost insulting to real victims to parade this about.

Really? She looks like she's in her mid-thirties.

Black people were sold as slaves by black people but if you tell them that they deny it

and now he is fired and can never have a job

Do you expect this film to be controversial?

ThanksUglyGod posted...
I get that having "x-race only" might upset you, but this is a far cry from the 500+ years of state-sanctioned racism that still is affecting us to this day

UnfairRepresent posted...

This is racial segregation

going "it gets worse " is why we are horrified, not a gotcha