| Board List | |
|---|---|
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 2:47:18 PM #222 | LordoftheMorons posted... Iirc whichever outlet broke the story transcribed the audio incorrectly. She said that Tulsi was a favorite of Russia but only a Republican asset. Since when is the defense in a criminal case required to produce evidence against themselves? Never. We fought a revolution to guarantee to ourselves this right. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 2:41:12 PM #219 | I thought she said "Russian asset." It's going to be tough because Tulsi is a public figure so she has to prove Hillary acted with actual malice. But I do believe that Hillary acted knowingly and maliciously so hopefully that truth will come out. The case does have a problem with damages - it seems like Hillary's comment boosted Tulsi in the polls so it doesn't seem to have damaged her. If I could as a juror, I would award Tulsi $1 in nominal damages and $49,999,999 in punitive damages. I don't think 50 million x punitive damages are allowed anymore though. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 2:20:14 PM #216 | banananor posted... wait... when does the statute of limitations run out on birtherism? Based on a google search, it looks like the various states vary between 6 months to 3 years. So I think we are already past that point. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 2:01:25 PM #214 | I'm hoping that by 2032, the Democratic Party will fade into irrelevancy, and the Republican Party can split into 2 new parties to represent the left and the right while the toxic centrists go down with the ship of the Democratic Party into political defeat for a generation. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Should the Republican Party adopt socialism? |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 1:52:05 PM #1 | Should the Republican Party adopt socialism?
Vote
--- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 1:18:04 PM #212 | 2024 Democratic Primary: Ronald Reagan Jr. Megan McCain Michelle Obama Hillary Clinton Lindsey Graham John Kasich Elizabeth Warren Mike Bloomberg Tom Steyer Mitt Romney The list of 2024 Dem contenders after the Republicans poach their best talent. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 12:42:48 PM #211 | Judge Jeanine on Fox News has been repeatedly hammering Clinton/Obama for months/years for secretly selling uranium to Russia. So maybe Trump got some ideas there. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 12:18:25 PM #208 | https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/22/tulsi-gabbard-hillary-clinton-russian-asset-defamation-lawsuit It's happening! Tulsi Gabbard has sued Hillary Clinton for defamation, seeking $50 million. Go Tulsi! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 2:14:50 AM #199 | I read the articles of impeachment. What garbage. I fully support a motion to dismiss. Get to work on issues of actual importance like repealing and replacing Obamacare and investigating Hillary's emails. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 2:02:06 AM #195 | Spoilers: Trump's reality bending powers are fueled by the Democratic Party's refusal to apologize. When they wake up and repent and show genuine contrition and take action to reform themselves, Trump will fade into the history books as the man who saved the Democratic Party by confronting them with reality. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/22/20 1:58:02 AM #194 | LordoftheMorons posted... https://twitter.com/lawrence/status/1219859504352976896?s=21 Trump is a man of his word. Reality simply shifts to whatever he is saying at the moment. If the Democrats disagree let them prove it! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 9:09:57 PM #172 | LordoftheMorons posted... It's funny to see you say that because that's a large part of the argument that Sanders unacceptably hurt Hillary in the last primary! (e.g. that it's impossible to walk back insinuations that Clinton was bought and sold by Goldman Sachs or whoever). But those allegations were true. Hillary should have confessed and either said "so what" like Trump, or quit and let Bernie be the nominee. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 7:51:21 PM #160 | LordoftheMorons posted... Good, Hillary walked back the uncertainty about supporting Sanders: Hillary, you can't even imagine having authentic views anymore. You've gone so long without having them that you can't even imagine what they look like anymore. Please retire and work on accepting that the American People made the right decision in choosing Donald Trump over you. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 7:49:16 PM #158 | So I wonder if the Democrats will learn a lesson from this. If you start something, Mitch McConnell is prepared to finish it. Harry Reid started the nuclear option and Mitch has expanded and perfected it. The House used an arbitrary process based on partisanship and now Mitch is taking it to its conclusion. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 7:33:32 PM #154 | HeroDelTiempo17 posted... You somehow forgot Don Jr., Eric Trump, and most importantly Kanye West The Trump family will have a private primary to decide which member they run to avoid splitting the votes. The GOP will not support Kanye. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 7:08:24 PM #150 | So now our field for Republican nominee 2024: Bernie Sanders Tulsi Gabbard Andrew Yang Pete Buttigieg George Prescott Bush Ivanka Trump Kellyanne Conway Nikki Haley Matt Gaetz Marco Rubio Ted Cruz Looks pretty good! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 6:58:01 PM #148 | Pete is actually very good looking. I think the GOP should invite him to run in the GOP primary in 2024. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 6:39:14 PM #144 | xp1337 posted... i mean watching the checks and balances of our government die in real time is kind of a big deal even if we all knew it was going to happen The Senate is a check on the House's power. This isn't the UK where a simple majority of the Commons can remove a prime minister. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 5:19:12 PM #90 | LordoftheMorons posted... In a relative sense, she does get called out too much compared to other GOP Senators because she has a history of sometimes not being a total hack. But if you do that you get tuned out. You have a limited amount of political credibility so it's all about how you allocate it. That's why nothing sticks against Trump - the Democrats attack him with the same intensity for bragging about himself on MLK Day and for using his office to enrich himself. You lose all your credibility that way. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 5:00:54 PM #83 | Liberals from outside Maine have been so incredibly mean to Susan Collins, it's really shameful. She is the most or 2nd most moderate Republican senator and they treat her far more viciously than anyone else. I mean if that's the reward you get for trying to broker compromise it's just sending the message it's better to just vote in lockstep with Mitch at all times and stay out of the spotlight. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 4:56:56 PM #82 | LordoftheMorons posted... I said Bernie isnt sexist Anyone can claim to support anyone. Maybe all the people saying Hillary's deplorables comment was correct were actually Russians being paid to post online and we shouldn't have gotten so upset at the liberals after all! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 4:52:58 PM #80 | Hillary's comment is the epitome of toxic. She disagrees with Bernie on policy issues but she can't win a debate with him there in the eyes of the public so she resorts to smears. It's like Bush accusing McCain of having a mixed race child out of wedlock. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 4:40:18 PM #73 | LordoftheMorons posted... The story of genesis blames Eve - literally an avatar for her entire gender - for giving into the snake and costing humanity Eden Genesis places greater blame on the snake, who is male. Also, Adam uses that exact defense of blaming Eve when God confronts him and God does not accept it as a defense. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 4:33:34 PM #66 | LordoftheMorons posted... Snake has been a gendered insult since Genesis! What? The snake in Genesis is male. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 4:30:34 PM #64 | LordoftheMorons posted... I dont think that Bernie himself is a sexist. You have no way of knowing if those people are even Bernie supporters. They could be people working in a warehouse in Russia. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 4:29:11 PM #62 | If Bernie gets elected the Clinton Foundation (and the Trump Foundation if it's still around) might have to start paying taxes. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 3:52:31 PM #53 | Jakyl25 posted... https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/01/21/metro/iranian-student-removed-us-before-court-hearing-lawyer-says/ Well, if Northeastern refunds his tuition, he's probably better off. Definitely better than sitting in jail. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 3:27:25 PM #48 | I'm not sure how I feel about Trump's thing about holding members of Congress responsible for what happens in their district. Like how much power does Nancy Pelosi have to address homelessness in San Francisco? She's SF's delegate to Congress, not its queen. It seems unfair to blame her for problems outside the scope of her position. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 2:44:19 PM #44 | LordoftheMorons posted... They were allowed to call witnesses (iirc Sondland and Morrison were their witnesses?). What was rejected was the Republicans either calling witnesses that couldn't possible have any relevant knowledge (e.g. Hunter Biden) or calling a witness in order to illegally retaliate against them (calling the whistleblower in order to reveal their identity and then allow Trump to punish them). Right, well then the Senate may also refuse to hear from witnesses with no relevant knowledge. So strike all the law professors the House heard from, none of whom had any personal knowledge of any of the allegations. And based on the precedent set by the House, the majority of the Senate has complete discretion to decide who has and does not have relevant knowledge. So it may be that the only witnesses are going to be Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton. I look forward to them pleading the fifth. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 2:35:41 PM #40 | More seriously, LOTM, the precedent that the House violated was not that the defense gets to call witnesses, but that the minority party in Congress gets to call witnesses. The minority on any Congressional committee is always allowed to call witnesses - or at least that was the precedent. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 2:28:29 PM #37 | LordoftheMorons posted... Impeachment is an indictment The members of the grand jury are allowed to call witnesses and issue subpoenas to compel their appearance. Here, the majority of the House refused to allow the minority to call its witnesses. So, if Mitch was really being fair, he would apply the same rule in the Senate - only the majority party may call witnesses. But he's actually being nice and allowing both sides to present evidence if they get past the motion to dismiss stage. Very generous of him! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 1:44:43 PM #27 | So reflecting a bit more on the impeachment trial: Democrats spent months telling us that impeachment was not a criminal trial and the House did not have to give the President all the rights the Constitution gives to a criminal defendant. Ok, fair enough. You are allowed to have a kangaroo court hearing in which you don't allow the defense to call witnesses. But by the same reasoning, the Senate is equally empowered to decide what it thinks the standards and rules for an impeachment trial should be. And the Senate can make the standard of proof for an impeachment trial higher than a regular one. Fair is fair. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 1:00:53 PM #25 | Ok, how much is Donald Trump paying Hillary Clinton to make all these comments? It's like she is trying to make the 2020 Democratic nominee lose. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 12:28:20 PM #22 | Not_an_Owl posted... Impeach McConnell tbqh There is precedent that members of Congress cannot be impeached, but imagine the fun we could have if it were allowed. House: We impeach Mitch McConnell. Senate: We acquit Mitch McConnell. Also we received a second set of articles of impeachment impeaching Nancy Pelosi. House: Wait, we didn't impeach Pelosi. Senate: Well, we received a document titled "Articles of Impeachment against Nancy Pelosi" so we are going to put her on trial. House: Well, then we won't present any evidence against her. Senate: We convict Nancy Pelosi for obstruction of justice for directing the House to refuse to prosecute her. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 12:12:49 PM #19 | Xeybozn posted... Come to think of it, isn't Pelosi the person in charge of inviting Trump to the Capitol to give the SotU address? Could she threaten to rescind his invitation if a fair trial isn't allowed? I feel like Trump would fold pretty easily just because of his need for everyone to pay attention to him. Yes, but there are workarounds. Mitch could invite Trump to give the SOTU in the Senate chamber and tell the House they can watch on TV. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 12:06:15 PM #17 | Yes, I think some of the Republican senators are worried about the optics of dismissing the charges even if they know it's the right thing to do. Plus the House could then vote for new articles of impeachment that actually charge real crimes. Probably the safest thing to do to avoid dismissal is to just charge bribery. That is explicitly stated by the Constitution as an impeachable offense so they couldn't really dismiss it. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 11:19:47 AM #14 | So to explain a bit further, the prosecution and defense can agree to admit evidence to save time. Like, suppose the prosecution wants to call an expert in psychic readings to testify about what she saw in her crystal ball. The defense could probably object and get her testimony excluded on the ground that psychic readings are not reliable. But if the defense doesn't mind, they could agree to let the testimony in. Maybe the defense thinks the jury will think it's a witch hunt! It looks like this happened in the Clinton case given the unanimous vote to admit the House record. Note that is not a vote to believe the contents of the House record, only to allow the jury to consider it. In a regular court the judge would rule on admissibility before the jury hears the evidence so that if it's found inadmissible the jury never hears it. That's not possible in the Senate where the senators are judge and jury, but in principle the senators are supposed to not consider evidence found inadmissible. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 11:11:18 AM #12 | Well evidence can be admissible and not be believed. Evidence can also be admissible and not sufficient to prove the charges made. And Xp, I don't think I was wrong. The Senate in the Clinton case did vote on whether to admit the House record and they voted for it. That's all McConnell is asking for here - a fair vote. If the House proposes that they admit all of the House record the outcome will be no. But that doesn't mean each individual piece of evidence is going to be ruled inadmissible. There are well established rules in regular court to aid in deciding on admissibility. While not binding on the Senate, this idea that the House won't be allowed to speak is ridiculous. If the House has any non-hearsay evidence that they've disclosed to the defense ahead of time and doesn't violate the Bill of Rights, they'll get to present it. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 260: Now Endorsing Every Candidate |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 9:50:04 AM #8 | xp1337 posted... Quoting from closed topics is hard (or i'm dumb) so wrt "what did the Senate do with Clinton" discussion that broke out at the end of last topic Because the Senate found that the House in the Clinton case conducted a legitimate investigation that led to admissible evidence. The defense has alleged and many senators have agreed that the House investigation this time lacked due process, is replete with hearsay, and generally produced no admissible evidence. Given these claims, the Senate needs to vote to decide this. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 6:04:17 AM #500 | Mr Lasastryke posted... was the house's evidence subjected to a vote during the bill clinton impeachment process? I'd be shocked if it wasn't. That would mean that President Clinton was denied the most basic due process. The court needs to do its job, a part of which is to rule on whether evidence is admissible (i.e. if the whistleblower won't testify, his evidence is getting tossed). --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/21/20 5:47:01 AM #496 | xp1337 posted... Not sure if this was mentioned before everything got sidelined into the MLK discussion but... It's 100% normal for the trial court to decide whether to admit evidence as it is presented. Like every trial court in the country does that, why would the Senate be an exception? If the House wants its evidence considered, it needs to present admissible evidence. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/20/20 11:33:58 PM #479 | LOTM, you should probably avoid posting libelous stuff. Like there's no benefit to it whatsoever. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/20/20 5:56:45 PM #317 | LOTM, just remember that when you get angry Trump wins. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | What do you want most from the Republican Party? |
| red sox 777 01/19/20 10:30:11 PM #1 | What do you want most from the Republican Party?
Vote
--- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/19/20 10:25:19 PM #257 | Corrik7 posted... Sanders has been going after Biden as anti social security and anti Medicare lately. Bernie, I want to stop paying into these things. That will save me a lot more money than Medicare for all or student loan forgiveness. Please make it happen! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | What do you want most from/for the Democratic Party? |
| red sox 777 01/19/20 10:23:00 PM #1 | What do you want most from/for the Democratic Party?
Vote
--- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/19/20 9:52:05 PM #254 | Bloomberg is the candidate you Democrats deserve. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/19/20 6:35:46 PM #250 | You can save time by just reading @realdonaldtrump. All the news is right there! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 259: Raucous Caucus Robots |
| red sox 777 01/19/20 5:17:26 PM #246 | So I realized another thing the Senate could do is filibuster until the election, then dismiss for mootness. Call it the corollary to the Biden Rule - the Senate will not remove a president during an election year. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Topic | What should the Senate do about impeachment? |
| red sox 777 01/19/20 5:14:44 PM #1 | What should the Senate do?
Vote
--- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! |
| Board List |