Lurker > Dragonblade01

MHW is a huge step from past MH games (for better and worse). Plus, it's great to see a high fidelity MH game. The monsters are gorgeous.

But if you're satisfied with the ones you're going through, you might get burned out starting another. And Sekiro is really good, so that might be your safer bet atm.

A show making you aware that a character is gay is not the same as the character being defined exclusively by their sexuality.

Beyond of the hopefully obvious fact that, you know, mutual consent is necessary; the best approach should be based on your own relationship and the person you're with. It's not like there's some magic, legally binding phrase that you need to use every time.

If her attitude is that I'm not allowed to work, she can go find someone else.

Well, considering there's nothing wrong with either of those things, I don't really see the problem with anyone being told about them at any age. We already expose our very young children to all sorts of stuff everyday, including lessons of morality and acceptable forms of romance. This seems pretty trivial by comparison.

It doesn't surprise me that some of the guys here think that their SO having a bachelorette party means she's going to cheat.

I didn't lose my virginity until around that age. What I did differently was probably not really looking for it.

I like this topic. It's a real strong example of how there are quite a few people who support LGBT, but that we still have a ways to go.

Never.

Sad_Face posted...

The information was always there. We had 2 months of watching China go through an apocalyptic event and yet people were still bringing up "it's just the flu bro!".

It just goes to show that the majority of people in this world have zero foresight. People's lackadaisical and slow reaction to the Wuflu is proof of this.

I mean, I first started hearing about it in January, and you could be forgiven for thinking it was just the next in the series of relatively minor outbreaks over the past couple decades.

People changed their views on something the more was learned about it?

The bastards!

Numenor posted...

I never said that. But whatever, obviously you prefer someone telling you what to do, to having to make that choice yourself.

This is literally the case of people having the choice made for them, and you are acting like it's somehow the opposite.

sktgamer_13dude posted...

That doesnt work when a disease is so contagious that you can infect people without even knowing you contacted them.

Personal responsibility goes out the window when your choices heavily affect how other people get sick. Stop pushing your dumb ideas.

It doesn't even go out the window. Following proper guidelines during a pandemic is nothing if not all about personal responsibility.

Sewage posted...

Freedoms were never under attack and if all you have is "muh freedom" arguments then you have nothing. You live in a society and with personal freedom comes personal responsibility. Freedom doesn't mean you get to run around putting other lives at risk. And even Abraham fucking Lincoln suspended freedoms for the betterment of the country. But what would he know about freedom?

If only so many of these personal freedom pushers understood that.

Some of you have an ugly idea of freedom.

Theoretically, time is malleable. But we'll never have the technology for it, and it almost certainly wouldn't work how we imagine it anyway.

Family fued spanning generations and dimensions started because one kid didn't like the other kid's dog.

Sounds like somebody just needs to TRY HARDER

Anyone who tells beginners the "correct" way to play is talking out their ass.

The nice thing about MH is it's at your pace. Grab a weapon, try to kill something. If it died you did good. If not, try something else.

All there is to it. In a way, it's very forgiving as long as you are down to experiment.

"I was asking a sarcastic, & a very sarcastic question, to the reporters in the room about disinfectant on the inside. But it does kill it."

Did... did he just double down on something he said was sarcastic in the previous line?

The defense is just the classic "Look guys, obviously what he literally said is too ridiculous, so he clearly means something different and you're just not getting it."

lincoln002 posted...

nothing happened

This is the best case scenario.

And ignoring so many things about bacteria in human bodies regardless, you wouldn't "feel great" by lowering the overall number of bacteria/viruses.

You wait until the curve stays consistently flat and when methods to deal with the infected are stable, then you slowly reopen while monitoring the sitiation very carefully.

It's bad when your entire case revolves around inflating infection numbers by adding people who are identical to those who aren't infected.

EvalAngell posted...

I mean you guys can just admit you're wrong and we can move on. You're not scientists and never will be. But the numbers don't lie.

You first.

EvalAngell posted...

the simple answer is this: millions had it...millions recovered.

So they actually did have it, just nobody knew about it, it was never tested, and it happened on a scale magnitudes greater than those who show symptoms.

Oh yeah, that definitely sounds like a reasonable assumption to make.

EvalAngell posted...

lol meanwhile Cuomo just posted data TODAY - literally an hour ago - showing that as much as 20% of the NYC population have anti-bodies. Number crunching suggests CFR is closer to .05% or even as low as 0.25%. On par or lower than seasonal flu. Get this fear mongering crap out of here.

Can you explain to me how 20% have developed anti-bodies when 20% haven't even been infected?

I didn't see the original video.

But if this was the apology, it must have been super racist.

HiddenRoar posted...

At this point, it's inevitable people will get infected, even if they were to follow your advice.

The only reason that the economy is shut down is so the healthcare system is not overwhelmed. That can be solved by gradual reopening of certain economic industries and continuing to practice social distancing and whatnot.

Cause keeping everything closed as they are now is going to be worse in the long run.

See, that's a much more reasonable comment than those trying to suggest that it's all one or the other. These things aren't independent. They affect one another, and so it's not like it one set of casualties versus another separate set of casualties. There will be overlap, both in terms of deaths and impact on the economy.

Well then you better never leave wherever you are so that you don't spread it to those with less health risks than you.

RoadsterUFO posted...

Congratulations, you saved someone from dying to a virus so they could shoot their brains out in response to financial losses, homelessness, unemployment, famines.

Congratulations, you saved someone from shooting their brains out so they could contract a virus that now 10s if not 100s of millions of people around the world have because no government was willing to risk their economies.

Am I doing the whole being unreasonable thing right? You seem to be an expert.

RoadsterUFO posted...

This flies over the heads of so many people.

It's important to remember that it's not deaths of covid vs deaths of a shutdown. At least some of those deaths from the latter would also apply to the former.

"I didn't wat to hurt him. I just decided to push him into an oncoming train."

Fucking dumbass doesn't even cover 1% of how dumb that is.

Because Americans dying and healthcare collapsing would do wonders for the economy.

Bomberman Hero

Never got a lot of OSTs like that.

Why don't we take the n-word and PUSH IT SOMEWHERE ELSE?