Lurker > PrinceReva

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1
TopicMy favorite video game of all time has
PrinceReva
06/30/20 11:51:35 PM
#26
I misunderstood the topic and tried to pick your favorite game's score. I selected 80-84 before scrolling down and seeing the 84. Then I realized what I was really intended to do, checked metacritic for Tomba! and found nothing, then checked on Xenogears which also has an 84. I guess it all panned out as best it could've lol

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicCan someone tell me what the difference between these two things are
PrinceReva
06/30/20 10:00:46 PM
#5
_stingers_ posted...
Is it really worth $80 more?

Eh, to someone who insists on every slight advantage, Those clocks are milliseconds, so what's .02 worth to you? Probably not worth it to me.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicCan someone tell me what the difference between these two things are
PrinceReva
06/30/20 9:44:57 PM
#3
Speed, CAS latency. The returns are diminishing, but that $200 model is pretty quick.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicDo you support abolishing social security?
PrinceReva
06/25/20 6:35:34 PM
#4
Riase the marginal tax rates to back where they were during "The American Dream" days of the 50's and 60's and also consider reallocating a percentage of funds from the Defense budget into it.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicWhat does "next Monday" mean to you?
PrinceReva
06/07/20 1:50:19 AM
#47
To me, 'Monday' when referring to the future would just be 2 days from now, and 'Next Monday' implies the Monday of next week, so at least a week away.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
Topicertyu0078 channel at 1060 subs
PrinceReva
05/21/20 6:54:45 PM
#8
ertyu0078 posted...
are you putting new ones up every day you get subs if you do that plus ive been planning head of time on them i hve videos in till june 13

This is a good strategy. I should come up with a strategy to create videos to upload for a later time.

ertyu0078 posted...
what are Doms

Oh, ertyu, you sweet summer child (of 45 years or w/e)

---
*slips away unnoticed*
Topicertyu0078 channel at 1060 subs
PrinceReva
05/21/20 6:20:45 PM
#4
I have videos too, but my channel didn't jump from meager subs to 1K+ overnight. Where'd you go to get subs?

---
*slips away unnoticed*
Topicertyu0078 channel at 1060 subs
PrinceReva
05/21/20 6:13:30 PM
#2
Where'd you go to get subs?

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/21/20 6:11:45 PM
#95
foolm0r0n posted...
Just because you think the world would be saved by taxing everyone 99% doesn't mean everyone agrees that he's a terrible person for BARELY reducing taxes. You're talking about tax cuts and deregulation for the guy under whom you're paying more than ever, and who has consolidated more industry power under the executive than ever (aka literal socialism). You're advertising him so much better than he ever could.

I personally only think someone should be taxed at 99% after they've made their first $250,000,000 or so for the year. I understand that taxes are at their highest they've been in decades, but the man saying he'd lower taxes and actually doing it is what his base wants, like I stated. Also, if you think that consolidating power into the executive branch is at all related to Socialism, then you have a very misguided view of what Socialism is.

foolmo, you've been here a long time, just like I have. It's clear that neither one of us will improve our impression of the other by discussing politics. It's a touchy subject, I know. I don't want to heighten either of our blood pressure any further by squabbling. I'm sorry if I've offended you, and I sincerely wish you the best.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
Topicertyu is back
PrinceReva
05/20/20 2:05:02 PM
#2
ertyu why make so many different topics instead of one topic covering multiple subjects? You're flooding the board.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicAlmost 20 years later, I saw the Blue Shell in SC for the first time
PrinceReva
05/20/20 12:43:19 PM
#3
There are blue shells in Soul Calibur?

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/20/20 12:06:53 AM
#89
Inviso posted...
Bernie lost to Hillary in 2016. In 2020, Bernie did not change his campaign style, and Joe Biden is a more popular equivalent of Hillary Clinton. Joe Biden beating Bernie more than Hillary did is not unexpected or some conspiracy. The problem is that you're gauging your personal excitement as being indicative of the nation as a whole.

Again, he had the most donors, volunteers and diverse base of any candidate. This isn't me projecting my ideals, it's reported data. I know nobody goes to the internet to change their minds, so I'll stop wasting everyone's time replying. I won't vote for either rapist in November, D or R, and I won't expect anyone who has replied to me to suddenly want to question their prized institutions or fight for human justice. I do appreciate the conversation though. It's the most active I've been here on board 8 in years. =]

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 11:55:35 PM
#87
red13n posted...
you are the one advocating to ignore the past.

This isn't true, and I wish you'd clarify your dead-end one line responses. The past is Obama had a supermajority and used it to pass a republican health care bill, get us into more war and build the immigrant cages people love to be outraged about now. "Let's do that again" isn't a winning message. "Vote for this jerk so we can get progress later" has been the Democratic rally since I've been sentient and never leads to progress.

red13n posted...
I mean, if you are going to go full conspiracy, we are done here.

By every tangible metric aside from those fed to you by media outlets, Bernie had the energy and excitement of a political movement. Most donors, most volunteers, biggest crowds at rallies, most diverse base, etc. He had won the first three primary/caucuses which no Dem candidate had done in my lifetime (maybe ever? I forget) and the media was in a full panic about it. I don't believe for any amount of time that the party who went to court to defend their right to pick anyone they want in spite of any votes was impartial to the guy running to fundamentally change their entire operation. They wouldn't give up that kind of power willingly.

https://tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/04/massachusetts-2020-democratic-party-primary/

https://tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/14/michigan-2020-democratic-party-primary/

https://tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/09/california-2020-democratic-party-primary/

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 11:41:34 PM
#84
red13n posted...
He suspended the next day I believe.

But even with that Biden pulled in more votes in Wisconsin than Bernie got in 2016. There was no way Bernie was competing with Biden even with full capacity running(Keep in mind, this cost votes for both of them). The old people, in the middle of a pandemic, basically went out and showed they were excited for Biden.

Are they dumb for going out in a pandemic? Yeah. But still.

I think in a normal year, no pandemic, with no reduction of polling stations, Bernie wins. Just like I think he wins MA if Warren didn't stick around to come in 3rd in her home state. Just like I think he would have won Texas if not for the poll problems there. Again, this is all assuming the vote totals are on the up and up and not at all fixed.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 11:37:56 PM
#83
LordoftheMorons posted...
Doubling down on accelerationism after this clusterfuck of an administration sure is a take

Learning nothing from the past and insisting this time will be different (forever and ever) seems to be a more popular one.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 11:32:59 PM
#80
red13n posted...
Do I have to tell you what is wrong with your stance on this one?

honestly it is so obvious I don't think its worth my time.

Well, if it has to do with a pandemic, there may have been other ways to conduct this primary, or have postponed it.

If you're thinking "Bernie suspended by that time" then you have no care whatsoever for the Democratic process.

If I'm missing it, then I'll take the bump.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 11:31:16 PM
#79
red13n posted...
No one is trying to tell you that you are wrong.

People will try to tell you that a solution of giving Trump 4 more years is actively counterproductive to your issues.

fool actually did say "And it's all wrong" about what I had said, which is why I did that. And the only people giving Trump 4 more years are the buffoons who thought Joe Biden was going to win in an election against him. There are marginally substantive policy differences between them. Joe Biden has absolutely advocated for cutting Social Security as recently as 2018. ( https://theintercept.com/2020/01/13/biden-cuts-social-security/)

And people have been told to "Wait for progress" for damn near sixty years now. MLK had plenty to say about the white moderate and being told to wait for a more convenient season. It's long past time and I'm not surrendering my vote to someone who has no interest in furthering my causes or fighting for people like me. While 4 more years of Trump will suck, it would suck worse to go back to what led to Trump in the first place and then turn over the keys again to someone just as evil but far more competent.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 11:13:24 PM
#72
red13n posted...
No it wasn't. His targetted advertising was horrible, his ads featured armies of young people and weren't particularly representative of the voting electorate.

His focus was entirely on the young voting block, he surrounded himself with them.

There was very little outreach made to the old, he had policies for them laid out but rarely if ever made them a focus.

He literally went after Joe Biden for a month about Social Security and how he would strengthen it while Joe has advocated for cutting it several times in his career. Coupled with M4A including hearing aids and glasses, if those aren't "Hey, old people, vote for me" positions, then I've gotta spend more time at Bingo nights with my nana. The youth turnout was the X-factor for a general election because they rarely vote. After seeing voter disenfranchisement to the tune of reduced polling locations in specifically young and minority-heavy counties, it would seem turnout wasn't so much the issue as was systemic disenfranchisement.

( https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/milwaukee/2020/03/31/coronavirus-milwaukee-voting-sites-cut-180-fewer-than-12/5099739002/

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/reports-show-texas-rapidly-reduced-number-of-polling-sites-in-black-and-latino-communities_n_5e5e942cc5b67ed38b397192 )

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 11:03:25 PM
#69
foolm0r0n posted...
It's impressive how the 2 party machine is able to convince a "staunch independent" to parrot all their propaganda. Read your post again and tell me a Trump supporter wouldn't be cheering hearing you talk about him. And it's all wrong, stories from the playbook. (Actually Trump DID do some real tax cuts with QPI and the doubled deduction. All those savings were obliterated by all his financial disasters, but it was still something.)

"Trump supporter cheers when non-affiliate notes how President Trump has passed legislation hurting the most vulnerable, just as the base asked for." Is this supposed to be shameful, or what? I don't care that his supporters applaud what they call his accomplishments. I care that there's no real opposition to him as the Democratic party leaders give him an expanded Patriot Act, more war powers and an increased military budget. Yeah, his economic gains have been shot due to his brilliant ineptitude, big surprise. You can bet there'll be plenty more of that to come.

But don't try and tell me I'm wrong

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/482352-trump-budget-slashes-funding-for-epa-environmental-programs

about stuff that's been everywhere

https://www.brookings.edu/interactives/tracking-deregulation-in-the-trump-era/


---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 10:48:21 PM
#65
red13n posted...
I mean, I'm not saying it "doesn't happen", but the data consistently shows it happens more to Democrats than it does to Republicans. The Republican solid base is larger.

But didn't Johnson/Weld get more votes than Stein/Baraka? Also Johnson got more votes than Stein in 2012. I think the narrative is just that "Green Party cost us the election!" every time Dems lose because they feel entitled to those votes.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 10:43:09 PM
#63
red13n posted...
And again, Bernie Sanders, while I support his policies, clearly wasn't the answer here. He did not invoke any excitement like people are trying to claim. He excited his base which was stagnant cycle to cycle. Old people came out in large numbers as basically a repudiation because his campaign strategy really relied on ignoring them.

Do I wish old people voted differently? Damn right. But we aren't old enough to have the power they wield yet.

Now, THIS is factually incorrect. His strategy was bringing his campaign to the people and explaining how it would work for them. Old people were set to get better Social Security, better medical benefits, and a planet their grandkids could realistically live on. He had the largest volunteer network of any candidate and they called more phones, delivered more leaflets and knocked on more doors than I care to check. Joe Biden wasn't filling stadiums, and until everyone dropped out he wasn't finishing above fourth most of the time. We can only go with the narrative we're given, but there's nothing except for likely cooked election results that suggests that Bernie didn't excite people.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 10:37:05 PM
#61
red13n posted...
This take is just factually wrong.

Well, I said there's an argument to be made. I am an independent. The most progressive Senator in my lifetime not named Mike Gravel is an Independent. Most unaffiliated voters I know backed Bernie. There are plenty of anecdotes to suggest he has broad appeal across the spectrum (Fox News town hall proposal popularity, Joe Rogan "endorsement") which makes it easy to think independents might share his views as well. I'm just providing supporting arguments though, which is a bit long winded when I could just say "The take is not factually wrong".

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 10:23:56 PM
#58
red13n posted...
Actually Warren tried to have more specific policy than Bernie and they still hated her.

They hated her because she's backed away from all of her strongest positions and showed herself to have no real principles. She loves to call herself progressive and then kneecap legitimate progressive movement (See her endorsement today of Nadler over his progressive, woman opponent.)

LordoftheMorons posted...
Biden has made the focus of his campaign restoring decency and competence to the White House, but he does have well defined positions on all of the big issues.

That's not a policy, that's a slogan they had to adopt after they realized "No Malarkey" was going to leave him as an unserious candidate. His policy plans, in my view, are vastly inadequate and do not meet the moment. Aiming for net-zero carbon by 2050 is 20 years too late. Supporting the coup in Venezuela is a no-go. Maintaining the wars in the middle-east, no thanks. Leaving 10 million people uninsured/underinsured while the rest of the industrialized world recognizes how insane that is, laughable if not so cruel. This is what "nothing will fundamentally change (for billionaires)" looks like in policy, and is exactly what led to Trump's election in the first place.

red13n posted...
Also you can not subscribe to it but its just a fact.

The Republican base falls in line.

Democrats are prone to voting third party or "voting for the other guy".

There is a group of middle ground independents that could go either way.

But Democrats are in a constant battle of entitlement where various bases of their party don't show up to vote because they didn't get exactly what they want or that decide they are going to vote for someone else. And no, its not a "progressive" thing. If they bow to the progressives, all the "moderates" will work the same way. And right now, the old people are more moderate, and there are more of them that vote than "young progressives" by a significant amount.

So no, the Democratic party cant just bow down to the far left wing and expect to actually win. The primary pretty much showcased this as a fact. We know the future of the party is progressive, but we arent at that point yet.

The Democratic party is determined to eat itself while Republicans "love the uneducated" all the way to victory.

The Republican base "falls in line" because they play to that base. The Democrat Party, instead of trying to court and excite the other side of that spectrum, actually tries to get the Republican base's less enthusiastic constituents, alienating millions of potential voters and duping millions of other "Blue no matter who" rubes. This is their problem and why they're nothing more than controlled opposition. They're paid to lose. Medicare for All is an overwhelmingly popular proposal among Democrats and Independents, but they won't run with it because they love taking money from the insurance companies and pharmaceutical industry. Student debt relief would be a massive boon to the economy, but it's a pipe dream. The rest of the world understands the benefit of these programs, but we eat the shit sandwich because "This is what people voted for and wanted". Sure they did.

Also, there's a good argument to be made that a winning majority of Independent voters could be that "far left wing" that Democrats love to take for granted. After all, Bernie Sanders is perhaps the most famous Independent American politician in the last 30 years, and many have entered/exited the party as independents based on his Presidential candidacy.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 9:22:02 PM
#51
foolm0r0n posted...
He has the D next to his name, that's his platform. Christ man be a 3rd party voter, but don't be a child. It's embarrassing and why people who are cheering for the 2016 status quo to come back still are able to feel superior to you.

Trump is the opposite of this. Yet he has the R next to his name, which means he automatically has a base, AND gets to decide what the base believes. He's used that to change what his base supports, but it has not really changed WHO his base is.

This is an absurd, reductionist assessment and I don't subscribe to it. The platform, the policy platform that he is supposed to stump on and be his message of what he hopes to do as President, is not "D". The D is his political party. That party is supposed to stand for something and represent like-minded interests. Lots of people liked Bernie because his platform was clear and he wanted to help the working class with the programs he proposed. Joe doesn't have much of a platform, he has platitudes.

As for Trump, the guy who gave billionaires a huge tax break within his first two years, cut tons of business regulations and did away with much of the EPA just to name a few things, indeed has that R next to his name. Every rollback of regulation, each government program cut, and every worker protection stripped is red meat to that R base. He's wildly popular within the party for those very reasons.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 3:18:25 PM
#49
red sox 777 posted...
Biden was better than Delaney and Bloomberg only in that he didn't make himself the center of attention. In terms of actual speaking, he was worse. Bloomberg, for instance, could have won that debate if the audience (at home) consisted of Republicans rather than Democrats. He lost because the ideas he was pitching were not what Democrats were interested in.

Biden couldn't have won that debate with any audience I think. He was able to avoid coming in last simply by saying nothing memorable.


BINGO! I agree with all of this, and judging from the past few months, this is Joe's campaign strategy. Stay scarcely in the public eye, let the other guy take the heat, hope the electorate is desperate for "Anyone else". If he says too much he'll go the way of Bloomberg, offering up bad ideas that would seem normal for the GOP.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 3:14:30 PM
#48
Mr Lasastryke posted...
i should clarify that i'm basing "consensus" mostly on the reactions in the politics containment topic. even though LotM is probably the only huge biden fan there, everyone was like "biden was ok." nobody was arguing biden was as terrible in the debates as delaney or bloomberg.

and hillary was extremely unlikable and UNBELIEVABLY condescending in the debates. i hate trump as much as the next guy, but even i was starting to get annoyed at hillary's smug laughing and ever-present "lol he's such a clown what am i even doing on this stage" attitude. not saying biden is super charismatic but i'll give him that he's better than hillary in this regard.

Ahh, I understand. I will go on record and say that LotM is now the ONLY person I've heard of who is actually a "huge Biden fan" anywhere either online or in person. I'm glad to finally check that box.

As for Hillary, seeing that her whole campaign strategy was to collude with the media to elevate Trump and try to "Oh Brother, get a load of this guy." her way into the White House, her smug pompousness was part and parcel of the whole campaign. It didn't help, but it at least gave viewers the impression that she was on-the-ball and could clearly respond to questions asked (not substantively, just put the sentences together). I don't get that from Biden. I was saying back in January that it's sad and someone needs to pull him from the campaign trail as he's clearly deteriorating.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 2:47:50 PM
#45
Mr Lasastryke posted...
hard disagree.

like red said, the consensus about the dem debates was that biden was decent. not amazing, but decent. seems like the "he couldn't even string a sentence together lol" thing is revisionist history that people are applying now that biden has the "he's a demented grandpa" stigma. also, hillary was an unbelievably terrible debater.

The consensus is also loudly purported by Biden-friendly media doing anything they can to keep the spotlight off of Bernie. They're doing all they can to drag him along through November even while he's nowhere to be found.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADDrSvNyqEY

17 minutes of Joe Biden demonstrating that he has a hard time putting sentences together; a hard time not misspeaking, plenty of those clips during debates. And if you think Hillary was a terrible debater and Biden isn't, you aren't paying any attention. They both spew platitudes amounting to word-salad and nothing, the only difference is Hillary at least made people think she was speaking from a place of knowing and not stumbling through buzzwords and slogans.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicErtyu leaves board 8
PrinceReva
05/19/20 2:31:37 PM
#5
Thanks for staying, ertyu

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/19/20 12:01:36 PM
#35
red13n posted...
Biden was fine in the Democratic debates against stronger debaters than Trump.

So all evidence points to you being wrong.

I don't know that we watched the same debates then. Biden could hardly complete a sentence, and didn't talk about his plans for anything as much as he pointed to the past and said "Barack and I did (x, y, z) so I know we can do that again" as if things were any better from 08-16.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/18/20 9:32:30 PM
#23
foolm0r0n posted...
That's not a "base", that's just a small minority of people. It's the opposite of a base. You're a minority, and your party definitely isn't your friend.

That said, this isn't an election of bases. No presidential election really is. It's all about the many swing groups that make up the vast majority of voters. What you're complaining about is that the Democrats aren't catering to your group in their attempt to tip the scales. That's because your group threatens the base, so it might not be worth the risk. But too much risk avoidance guarantees failure, hence the Democrat party.

Well, with this explanation I can only guess that you view the Democratic base as "voters who think Joe is the safe pick" since he quite literally has close to no platform whatsoever. In contrast, I also view every presidential election as one of bases. The Republicans can be counted on to vote for "less taxes, less regulation, less government programs". That turns them out. If you want to excite the other side of the political spectrum, which the Democratic party, as the opposition party, should want to do, you have to conjure excitement with worker protections, environmental protections, an expanded social safety net, etc. However, in America we only have the options of moving to the right really fast or slowly. We don't go left in any meaningful way because both parties court the same high-dollar donors.


---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/18/20 1:38:57 PM
#17
Inviso posted...
That doesn't answer my question.

What "base" do you think the Democrats are ignoring?

The politically left/progressive/"liberal" base.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/18/20 12:28:08 PM
#14
Inviso posted...
If the majority of Democrats voted Biden in the primary, then what exactly do you think their base is?

The majority of Democrats didn't even get to vote with all of those cancelled primaries. I don't think I've even heard one person tell me any of his platform aside from "Reintroduce and expand the Affordable Care Act" which basically means we'll create a public option that will go bankrupt. Besides that, we know we'll continue to bomb the middle-east, continue to ignore climate scientists, continue to allow people to die without health care or incur exorbitant sums of medical debt, do nothing about student debt, continue this awful immigration policy, and we'll keep giving money to the richest people in the country at the expense of the working class. This isn't "Left/Progressive policies" which the Democrats love to co-opt the brand so much; this is Republican politics with a nicer guy at the helm.

Also, this is playing along with the "majority voted for Biden" narrative which I question due to the exit poll discrepancies.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicBernie supporters, who are you voting for?
PrinceReva
05/18/20 12:13:24 PM
#12
I'm pretty sure Jill Stein isn't runing for the Green Party this year. I could be wrong, but I think it's Howie Hawkins this time. If they seriously try to drag Biden's corpse through to November, I'm voting Green regardless of the candidate because I vote on policy, not party. Democrats are looking more and more like controlled opposition paid to lose as they ignore their base and try to court anti-Trump Republicans. Maybe this time the Green Party can hit 5% for federal funding.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicI am done with you people of gamefaqs
PrinceReva
05/14/20 6:15:54 PM
#18
No. Stop. Wait. Come back.

We love you ertyu.<3

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicXenogame
PrinceReva
05/12/20 11:21:14 AM
#11
Xenogears is miles above the rest. Wish they could/would revisit it and finish it.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicHalo 2 Anniversary out today on PC
PrinceReva
05/12/20 11:18:29 AM
#2
Well, technically yeah. It's out at 11PM EST. Wish they'd have advertised it for tomorrow and surprised it a couple hours early instead of advertising as today and waiting until practically tomorrow.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicErtyu igorne GReat p
PrinceReva
05/08/20 12:54:00 PM
#7
Viewed/Commented.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicNew Joe Biden ads running
PrinceReva
05/08/20 12:46:34 PM
#24
WG4F_is_win posted...
The right thing to do is to intentionally give people a president they didn't vote for?
USA is supposed to be a republic where candidates are elected. Nobody sane wants a mystery leader to get that power

Well, I don't know anyone personally excited for Joe Biden, and have only met one person who expressed interest in his candidacy, but solely on name recognition. The exit polling data would suggest that the DNC is (arguably again) giving people a president they didn't vote for. Either way, with his obvious mental decline and this rape allegation finally gaining steam, I will eat my hat if Joe Biden is the person running against Trump in November. They're going to swap him, but they'll do it in a way that still ensures Bernie Sanders doesn't get chosen.

https://tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/09/california-2020-democratic-party-primary/

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 274: Rebuttigieg
PrinceReva
02/29/20 8:37:54 PM
#459
Corrik7 posted...
Damn CNN straight up talking about a tag team match run by Dem conservatives against Sanders.

All the MSM shamelessly ditches their credibility to attack Sanders because he's going to tax their bosses income.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicMy dad had a heart attack.
PrinceReva
02/29/20 8:35:20 PM
#5
Best wishes your way, Rock. Hope it's getting taken care of and everything works out.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 270: Bloomberg/Clinton 2020 Campaign HQ
PrinceReva
02/19/20 11:04:43 PM
#303
Biden, still decaying in front of a live studio audience and the rest of America, forgot that he was giving his closing remarks and not supposed to be going on the offensive. Warren showed up strong, but this election is Bernie's to win.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicWhen you play videogames what more important to you
PrinceReva
02/01/20 11:48:28 PM
#3
Beating the game. I don't need any other sort of metric telling me how to go about playing a game.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicGuess my weight
PrinceReva
01/31/20 11:30:46 PM
#19
233lbs

---
*slips away unnoticed*
TopicChips ayoe or orieos
PrinceReva
01/31/20 10:11:33 PM
#5
Between those two, I'll take the Oreo.

---
*slips away unnoticed*
Board List
Page List: 1