Lurker > dainkinkaide

I'm stretching the rules to detail the entire Daddy's Creed series:
Daddy's Creed
Daddy's Creed II
Daddy's Creed Fatherhood
Daddy's Creed Revelations
Daddy's Creed III
Daddy's Creed IV: Black Dad
Daddy's Creed Rogue
Daddy's Creed Unity
Daddy's Creed Syndadcate
Daddy's Creed Origins
Daddy's Creed Daddyssey
Daddy's Creed Dadhalla

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

thedeerzord posted...

I am just complaining about the insane amount of homosexuals in shows and movies where they have themes that arent homosexual or romantic at all, and also the fact that TV and movie producers of shoving their SJW agenda onto their content, and it can sometime ruin said content as well.

If "gay people exist" is shoving an SJW agenda into fiction, then I've got some bad news for you about reality.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

That's entirely incorrect. Since the total amount of energy (and therefore mass) in the universe has always been the same, the individual parts that would eventually become what is at this moment me have always existed and will always exist in some form or another.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

You don't get Wendigos through possession; you get Wendigos through eating human flesh.

Anyway, I choose Teen Wolf, so I can be awesome at basketball.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Sonia Belmont.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

G-Ziss posted...

Anyone who supports the idea of 16-year old nude selfies is seriously deranged.

Just for the sake of argument, what is the reasoning that led you to this conclusion?

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Smarkil posted...

But is it confirmed this actually ended up on Twitter? So far as I can tell, we only have the claim that it happened from the daughter.

As far as I can glean, Claudia never actually saw her mother post the picture on Twitter. However, a number of her followers did apparently see it happen and told her about it.

This means either:

1. Multiple witnesses saw Kellyanne Conway post a topless photo of her teenage daughter, or
2. Multiple people, who somehow knew a topless photo of Claudia Conway existed, conspired to create a fictional account of that topless photo being posted on Twitter by her mother.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

TheOkHornedRat posted...

second, can you post a link to the criminal code you are referring to as well as indicating any relevant section numbers? i am genuinely curious to read it.

Yeah, sure, no problem.
https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/22/chapters/31/

And you can see how that differs from the definitions in the chapter on non-consensual pornography, here:
https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/22/chapters/30A/

I would hazard a guess that the main reason that Chapter 31 does not include simple topless photos of children is because they don't want parents going to prison for taking pictures of their toddlers in diapers.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

TheOkHornedRat posted...

so, just saying, but its equally illegal for the daughter to have those photos.

Is it, though? Because I'm looking at the DC Criminal Code right now, and I can't find a statute that prohibits a minor from taking and storing topless photos of themselves.

Kellyanne posting a topless photo of her minor daughter on Twitter absolutely and without question violates 22-3053 of the DC Criminal Code (First-degree unlawful publication of Non-consensual pornography), which is a felony.

In fact, the very next Chapter of the DC Criminal Code (regarding Sexual Performance Using Minors) has definitions that do not strictly include being topless as a form of "Sexual Conduct" and, even if they did, specifically excludes the minors depicted in the "Sexual Performance" from liability for possessing or transmitting the "Sexual Performance" unless at least one of the minors depicted does not consent to its transmission.

Ergo, it would appear to be completely legal for Claudia Conway to possess a topless photo of herself, and not "equally illegal", as you stated.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

That's an average of about 21 (~20.93) false or misleading statements a day. That's an average ~0.87192 false or misleading statements an hour. That's an average of one false or misleading statement every 69 minutes.

Of course, that's not accounting for any time Trump presumably spent sleeping, golfing, or otherwise not making public statements.

And it's not really a great metric for comparing him to other presidents or politicians, because this particular bloviating buffoon made a crap ton of public statements. A better metric would be the rate of false or misleading public statements to total public statements.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Some French dudes wanted to make their Arthurian OC Lancelot so drop dead gorgeous that two powerful queens were lusting after him. She didn't hate her half-brother Arthur, but she absolutely despised his wife for fucking the totally hot French dude that she wanted to fuck.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Zeus posted...

Or, you know, you could be impeached for ACTUAL offenses. That's not even touching on your double-standards regarding rhetoric.

Pretty dang sure 18 USC 2383 is an ACTUAL offense, my dude.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

EvilMegas posted...

I mean its 2nd or 3rd degree murder unless he had a plan to kill cops that day.

There is no 3rd degree murder in either the US Criminal Code or the D.C. Criminal Code.

In addition, the felony murder rule may apply, kicking this back up to 1st degree murder.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

b_hamnite posted...

Last I checked, shit is organic...

Last I checked, plastic is organic.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Yellow posted...

One other thing I'd like to mention, Parlor was """hacked""" and all information about all its users is now public. This is because they didn't even remotely secure their databases and all their data was literally in public domain. Think about this before you give your data to someone who can't read a chart or a scientific study. But if you had an account, your private messages, address, driver's license (I'm not shitting you they required this and left it on a public server), are now readable by me, every user on this board, every law agent, and every employer you may have in the future. It's a good thing we're not stupid enough to use Parlor, right??

OK, the "hack" here was just an unsecured/public API and posts that were identified via sequential integer IDs. This means that the only information obtained from this "hack" are public posts (parleys, photos, and videos, potentially even those that had been deleted) and any metadata associated with those posts (including geotags in photos and videos).

No driver's licenses, SSNs, or IPs were revealed through this "hack".

A little under 60 TB of information was downloaded in this manner before Amazon shut the servers down.

Seriously, though, Parler was extremely shit at security on numerous levels, but at least Driver's Licences, SSNs, and IPs weren't public-facing.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

LuciferSage posted...

No, I was mocking you.

Ah yes, mocking. Because, as we all know, when the northern mockingbird attempts to make the sound of a blue jay, it actually produces the sound of a constipated eagle.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

LuciferSage posted...

[citation needed]

Go ahead, I'll wait.

The implication here was that you don't read things before you summarize them. In essence, the "tl;dr" summary you made of my post was quite literal in that you didn't read it at all.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

LuciferSage posted...

Tl;dr, everything I disagree with is ist-and-phobic: the post.

You're that one guy who summarized "Catcher in the Rye" as "I don't know. It's about baseball, I guess."

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

LuciferSage posted...

"if conservatives don't like it, why don't they start their own social network?"

This is why. Every time they do, servers refuse to host them, payment processing services cut them off...etc. unless you're expecting conservatives to literally build their own utility infrastructure, server hosts, and payment services entirely from scratch, the argument is obviously bullshit, and this ain't the first time this has happened in recent years.

Actually, it goes a little more like this:

Every time conservatives start their own social network, it winds up attracting (for some mysterious reason) a "surprising" amount of white nationalists, neo-nazis, abject racists, domestic terrorists, seditionists, violent nutjobs, conspiracy theorists, and anti-semites. The hateful language and violent threats espoused by this varied groups of assholes inevitably gets the "free speech" conservative platform shut down for not moderating that shit because very few hosting service want to put up with that kind of hateful bullshit.

It's not like all conservative things get shut down. Hell, Conservapedia, which has apparently gone full dipshit (as opposed to only slightly dipshit) since the last time I looked at it over a decade ago, is still up. The problem is that many of these so-called "conservative" social media sites advertise themselves as "free speech" havens, which only serves to attract hateful bigots who talk about murdering Jewish people, lynching black people, and assassinating Republican Vice Presidents.

Nobody's getting their conservative social media sites shut down for discussing a miserly fiscal policy or tax breaks for billionaires.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Zeus posted...

Do you post things not knowing what they are or do you deliberately conflate them in an attempt to try to confuse people? You're comparing a civil matter to government-led censorship, which bears no resemblance between the two. And it wasn't Trump calling Zuckerberg and the others to a hearing.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act specifically protects sites (or "interactive computer services") that allow user-submitted content from liability for (most) criminal things posted by users. If it were fully repealed and revoked, as the Tang-faced buffoon in the Oval Office desired in the waning moments of his failed Presidency, Parler would have to implement a strict moderation policy or find itself shut down for being criminally liable for the criminal bullshit users have posted there. Likewise, Google and Apple would have to remove the Parler app from their respective stores or find themselves criminally liable for the criminal content posted via an app on their stores.

Enough damage has already been done to Section 230 by useless bullshit legislation like FOSTA, but a full repeal of Section 230 would have far more damaging effects on free speech than allowing private entities to moderate user-submitted content according to clearly delineated Terms of Service, Rules, and Guidelines would.

And this "government-led censorship" you're harping on about? That is frankly bullshit. The three latest hearings attended by Facebook were:

1. A hearing in late 2019 regarding Facebook allowing disinformation and outright lies in political ads posted to their service, as well as violations of housing discrimination laws. This, predictably, went fucking nowhere. Democrats wanted to know why Facebook would allow malicious ads in which Donald Trump's campaign told deliberate lies about Joe Biden to run on their service, and Zuckerberg just waffled off with a "I think we did the right thing, we strike a good balance, etc." (I'm severely paraphrasing). This accomplished nothing.
2. A big-ass anti-trust hearing in July of 2020, to which Google, Amazon, and Apple were also party. Lawmakers believed that the four companies were getting so big that they were stifling competition, whereas the four companies believed they needed to be giant, monolithic corporate gods in order to help their tiny competitors discover fire or whatever. This went nowhere and accomplished nothing.
3. An honest-to-God useless sham of a hearing about Section 230 (also involving Twitter and Google), with Democrats demanding to know what the companies involved were doing to rein in hate speech and voter suppression, and Republicans demanding to know why they were doing things to rein in hate speech and voter suppression. It was a big clusterfuck that accomplished nothing.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Well, since Mead posted the Perfect Strangers opening as literally the first post in the topic, I'm going to have to go with something else.

So I'd better rep my Canadian heritage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT15Gd81xa8

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

No, I'm mostly a social drinker, and there haven't really been a whole lot of opportunities for social drinking.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Your stats are:
STR:11
INT:17
WIS:16
DEX:15
CON:10
CHR:11

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Since nobody was wearing Cobra insignia or yelling anything about Cobra, the Joes wouldn't know who to fight.

Also, since nobody involved was obviously a robot, the Joes wouldn't have shot anybody either.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Hang on, Symbicort won't won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms? My fucking doctor took me off of Ventolin, telling me "You can use the Symbicort as a rescue inhaler".

Doesn't help that I don't have coverage for prescriptions, and Symbicort costs like $200, whereas the Ventolin, having a cheaper generic version, costs $20.

Now I'm glad he retired.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Fucken Fuckhew Fucker.

I thought it was improved by adding my middle name.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

I'm going to be honest. I originally read "munitions" in the topic title as "mutinous" and was thereby led to believe that you were on a seagoing vessel with a Labrador retriever who did not care for your particular method of captaining.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Yellow posted...

That's true but with Socialism it's mandated by law that 100% of the company is distributed to the workers (idk if it was exactly 100% in practice but that was the concept). Which is why it's such an easy jump to Communism, which is the same thing except owned by the government (public ownership).

That's not Communism; it's State Capitalism.

Sure, a lot of State Capitalist countries called themselves Communist, but in reality they stopped before they actually got there.

Marx initially believed that State Capitalism was the first step towards Communism, until the Paris Commune happened and he decided that no, actually, State Capitalism was a terrible idea and there were better to achieve Communism. Lenin continued to advocate for State Capitalism as a step towards true Communism, but no one ever actually made it that far.

Government ownership of the means of production does not eliminate the exploitation of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie as Socialism and Communism (being a form of Socialism) seek to do, it merely creates a new group of bourgeoisie to exploit the proletariat. It is antithetical to Socialism and, by extension, Communism.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

wwinterj25 posted...

So you admit there is times where the word is used outside of legal terms. Got it. Also Thanks for telling me how to speak English. I'd have never known. I can't even read English.

Yes, there are times where the word is used outside of the legal sense.

Those times are literally the 19th century.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

wwinterj25 posted...

The word entrapment, comes from the verb "to entrap", meaning to catch in a trap and that's what this is.
I also feel the need to post this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SlwV7mtsmw

When people use "entrap" in that sense, they're almost always referring to an actual physical trap or snare. And they never refer to the state of being entrapped (in that specific sense) as "entrapment".

Absolutely nobody has ever (for example) found a mouse caught in a live trap and said or even thought, "This is entrapment."

When English speakers use the word "entrapment" we are almost always referring to the legal sense.

...incorrectly.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Revelation34 posted...

By definition that is entrapment.

Well the girlfriends must be pretty psycho themselves to want to do this in the first place.

Entrapment isn't just a legal term.

Oh sure. So, were they lured into a dangerous situation or into illegal activity?

No?

Still not entrapment.

If another woman these men found very attractive had, unbeknownst to their girlfriends and out of genuine interest, propositioned them for sex, would they have not pretended to be single and taken her up on the offer?

Judging by their actions with this particular woman who merely acted like she had genuine interest in them, we can consider it quite likely that they would willingly cheat on their girlfriends, so this also doesn't fit the definition of entrapment.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Is she the police? Is she, as an agent of the state, enticing dudes to commit crimes they would otherwise be unlikely or unwilling to commit?

No?

Then this isn't entrapment.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

OniRonin posted...

wait do you think trudeau is far left. what does "far left" mean to you lol

"Far" is relative.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

ReggieTheReckless posted...

In English?!? Niceeeeeeee

Now all I need is the sequel and investigations 2 (and no the English unofficial patch doesn't count, I don't wanna play it on an emulator)

It's reportedly going to be both Dai Gyakuten Saiban games.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

30 + B + C + D = 872
B > C > D > 30

D = 279; C = 281; B = 282 OR D = 31; C = 32; B = 779 OR D = 31; C = 405; B = 406

282 B 779; 32 C 405; 31 D 279

This is, of course, only solving for integer solutions.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

The people to blame for "people" having an o is the Latin-loving lummoxes who standardized English spelling. In Middle English, it was spelled "peeple" or "peple", but because "populus" had an o in it, so too must "people".

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

LinkPizza posted...

Edit: Actually, quite a few. Google led me to a place that has a list.

Hal Jordan: Is a pilot. Found a dying alien who gave him the most powerful weapon in the universe.

Black Panther: Ruler of an entire nation. Married to one of the most powerful women in the universe.

Hank Pym: Scientist Supreme. Just has the occasional bouts of Inferiority complex.

Iron Man: Genius billionaire with an arsenal of weapons. One of the smartest people on the planet. Problems: Drinking and the first terrorist abduction. Nothing tragic or devastating.

Hal actually watched his father die in a plane crash and was forever haunted by this.

T'Challa's father was killed when he shielded his son from a fatal attack by Ulysses S. Klaue.

Hank Pym's first wife was abducted by Hungarian secret police and (presumably) murdered.

Tony Stark was adopted, and his adopted dad was a notorious shithead, alcoholic, and Mephisto worshipper.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Metalsonic66 posted...

Stilt-Man and the Puma want a piece of this action

I think we should go with Lady Stilt-Man for more female representation.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Gamergate was like a peach.

It had a soft, fuzzy exterior that was the "legitimate" grievance about ethics in video game journalism (even if very few of those involved actually knew what video game journalism and journalistic ethics were).

It had delicious, juicy flesh that was the (often misdirected) ire at those supposedly responsible for purported ethical breaches.

It had a poisonous, cyanide-filled pit that was the hatred directed at women involved in video games.

The soft, fuzzy exterior and delicious, juicy flesh served only to attract people to the "movement" and spread that poisonous, cyanide-filled pit to others, allowing the "movement" to proliferate and grow.

Gamergate was like a peach.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Zeus posted...

And most of the reason why you're more likely to be victimized by somebody you know (or kinda know) is because you're less likely to trust strangers or put yourself into dangerous situations.

Statistically speaking, most of the reason why you're more likely to be victimized by somebody you know is because you spend more time with individuals you know than you do with individuals you don't.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

It's actually quite simple. When it comes to wearing masks, they believe "my body, my choice", and when it comes to people getting abortions, they believe "your body, also my choice".

They're selfish, entitled pricks without a lick of empathy who insist that things must be done according to their beliefs.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

Decoy77 posted...

Not only that but she had a main goal, to eliminate the black population. Why do you think they push abortion so hard in the black communities? Why are most PP places in or close to black neighborhoods?

Because rate of effective contraceptive use is significantly lower in black and Hispanic people than other races, leading to higher rates of unintended pregnancy.

Since these communities seem to be the ones most in need of family planning services, including education in the use of and access to contraceptives as well as abortion services, that's where they're putting them. You're not going send a surfing instructor to Nunavut.

Unfortunately, distrust of family planning organizations seems to be a significant factor in the lower rate of effective contraceptive use, so spreading this absolute bullshit about how Planned Parenthood is or was trying to eliminate the black population isn't helping.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.

A TurboGafx-16 Mini from Amazon Japan.

---

The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.