Lurker > lolife67

I said people have used CRT for crazy stuff, not that CRT itself is crazy.

Fox News has articles that could answer that question. And if your first reaction to me saying that is rolling your eyes, it shouldn't be. The question is basically, what is the right complaining about, the answer is to listen to what they're saying. And for some reason I once again feel the need to point out I'm a liberal, because this isn't a real life interaction where people can roll with nuances of an organic conversation, it's the internet, where everything is chiseled into stone.

If that's the case, what are the options for fixing it? If you don't fix it, blacks will always be at the bottom. Whites won't give it up, and it's built into society. What are the options?

5th tenet, racism is permanent, racism being the everyday operation of our American society. He does say it's controversial. Whites could give it up, but they won't.

If it was only that, I think everyone would be agree with CRT, because your statement is pretty obviously true. People have used CRT in the name of a lot of insane stuff, though, which is what leads to the criticism you see of it coming from the right. As a liberal myself, im kinda annoyed by the flippant and dismissive responses of liberals when presented with CRT criticism from right leaning types.

"i'm black superman" please kill me

You mean movie 2. Where Brian jumps a car onto a boat. Or movie 3 where discount cena becomes a drift master in a week and the Yakuza are like okay you can live you won a race even though your friends with the guy who has been stealing from us. Or movie 4 where dom in an hour makes more progress than the us government in a month to find the drug supplier. Or 5 where they hijack a police station. I can't remember what happens in 6...is that the one where they jump a car from the skyscrapers or is that 7? Also can't remember if it was 4 or 5 where they jump off a corvette that went over a bridge. Theres another in I think 4 where dom drag races a gas tanker rolling down a mountain road where he perfectly times it.

It's a constant illogical progression that's best not to think of. Just accept they're super heroes and enjoy the ride.

How does this movie even exist

So obviously she supports a commission to look into it, right?
Right?

"Juneteenth is an affront to the unity of July 4th."

Yes, how dare people want to celebrate the anniversary of the day slaves were freed. We should only celebrate the anniversary of the day America was freed! /s

I can't speak for most guys but it's hard to get my bf to stop whatever he's doing to look at lingerie with me and because the signal isn't good in VS he normally stays out lmao. I really think people are overestimating how many dudes shop at vs

It literally does. Intimate apparel isn't like conventional fashion. When a woman buys a dress, it's to look good in front of a crowd. When a woman buys intimate apparel, she generally has a much smaller audience in mind. So even when the customer isn't the guy (which it often is) or the couple shopping together (which is also common at that those locations), the consideration is ultimately how things appeal to men.

...it's a brand literally catering to the interests of straight males, most of whom are white.

OG Lola has small boobs and (at the very least) semi-defined legs. New Lola has no boobs and Bugs Bunny legs. Again, your logic doesn't seem grounded in reality.

Again, needs to be said.

The main difference is the fact that in the first movie she wears a crop top, which is going to flow more naturally around breasts.

In comparison, wearing a basketball jersey like she is in the second movie, especially one that is loose, will not accentuate anything.

Unless there is an example of her wearing something similar in the second, that is the main difference in design.

How? Her arms are flabbier, and besides the breast reduction, she's just wearing a jersey that covers more. What logic are you using to say she looks more athletic, besides "not all sporty women have visible boobs" (which is irrelevant because many athletic women do have visible boobs)?

In terms of facial expression, maybe, but she literally has smaller arms now. You know you build muscle by playing sports.

Again, I don't really care about the sequel. But she has had a slight reduction of the arms as well as the chest.

We can both plainly see that she is now as flat as Bugs Bunny himself. There's not even the slightest bit of protrusion in the chest area. Here are Kim Possible characters in cheerleading outfits:



by your logic, they would suddenly look more athletic if they didn't have boobs. Your line of reasoning is confusing.

So CE could really try to even slightly address TCs question.

She doesn't look more athletic now.

yes, one of the goat sitcoms

Tony Stark is a c-lister for 40 years, and isnt known for wisecracks. The 616 version of him is now RDJ, its NOT the same character. I dont know why this is so hard to understand, the movies are loosely based on the Ultimate versions of the characters, which is fine, there is no reason to make those characters the new canon for 616.

The MCU has turned characters into wisecracking, cookie cutter versions of themselves, and without their various power sets, many of them could essentially be the same character.

Wonder what the next level threat will be? What will Kang bring that can be on Thanos level?

The source material is there and is completely unchanged do you have a melty every time a new comic reboot comes out and doesnt tell the exact same stories over and over? This is no different.

Been skimming Winter Soldier to see if they show anything but they already seem to retcon how he's controlled in the next movie, either by electrocution/brain zapping or a series of code words that activate his winter soldierness

"But it happened in the comics!"

Alternante time line doesnr seem so bad. And the infinity gauntlet really has limits?

If they needed help in the very beginning of a show called survivor to do basic shit to survive that negates their victory as they already showed we cant compete 1 to 1 without help at the start.

I do not ignore that the men were stupid enough to help them in anything. You are there to win, if your enemy comes to you for help you tell them no and let them lose so you win. Helping the enemy only proves how stupid the men were instead of having their eye on the prize which is to WIN.

Honestly the best thing Tony coulda done was snap use the snap to make it so
thanos never existed so none of it ever happened to begin with.

Nah, we pay those taxes for fun. Why would we want to make use of those years of having a percentage of our paycheck taken from us? /s

I support raising the minimum wage but I don't understand people that think its righteous to ride unemployment benefits rather than getting a job.

You are living off of society's charity not making some sort of noble stand.

I assume michael b Jordan almost literally never needs to be around people he doesn't want to be around, and those people he has to be around and doesn't want to be around aren't these guys

Despite the mix of scifi/horror/action being a guilty pleasure of mine, I don't like the film Aliens. Mostly because of Newt. In fact, I absolutely despise helpless children in horror movies, especially when they just scream and whine all the time, thus luring the danger toward them and getting all the cool and useful characters killed.