Lurker > Hornezz

The actresses for Kate Bishop and Cassie Lang are in their twenties as well. It doesn't look like MCU is going to do Young Avengers with teenagers

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

The green stuff is mashed potatoes and kale.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Fuck yeah, boerenkool met worst.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Tired-Insomniac posted...

Was he recast? I know they changed his face a bit between GOTG and IW but I thought he had the same voice.

The first time we saw him in Avengers' post credit scene, it wasn't Josh Brolin.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Thanos

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Starring Ms. Marvel, Captain Marvel (formerly known as Ms. Marvel) and Spectrum (formerly known as Captain Marvel)!

Not to be confused with the original Captain Marvel, who is now Shazam and is unrelated to Marvel.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

salami and mushrooms

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

This show is going to trigger the crap out of the usual crowd, isn't it?

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Well that's about the most boring teaser trailer ever.

I don't have high expectations of this reboot but I'll probably end up watching anyway. I loved the first few seasons and kept watching the later seasons hoping it'd get good again.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

https://bethanym.ytmnd.com/

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Those two weeks were the closest we've been to world peace.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

It's not just the UK. Here in The Netherlands people have been wearing them at anti-lockdown protests as well.


These say "not vaccinated".


Of course that Q-Anon idiocy has spread here too.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Key part here is that the words Islamic and Islamist don't mean the same thing. The Ottoman empire was Islamic, but calling them Islamist like Gabbard did isn't correct.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Money laundering scheme

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

RIP Super League
4/19/2021 - 4/20/2021

You shall be missed.

Dreams Can't Be Buy

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Cero_Miedo posted...

Yeah those teams can play in the Champions League as is the case at the moment. That's won't change. In fact it will mean more teams in the Champions League from the Prem as I'm assuming the 6 teams in the ESL won't be in the ESL and CL.

How would there be more teams in the CL if these teams want to replace the CL with ESL? I have no idea what you mean here.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Cero_Miedo posted...

How is this destroying the domestic leagues? The SL is to replace the Champions League. These teams will still be playing in their domestic leagues.

The league rankings will become near useless. Who cares if the club places 2nd or 15th, they'll qualify for the ESL regardless.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Bio1590 posted...

Wait I never thought of these guys do they actually have that power? I figured they were just talking about European players playing for European national teams.

FIFA can do that. And it seems like they're firmly supporting UEFA in this.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

The_Korey posted...

Was the guy drunk? Those arms look like the shoud have more force behind them, but the guy throws an like he woke up 2 seconds ago.

Right, wtf was that at 1:05 - 1:10. That was before he got knocked down and had his legs turn to jelly.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

There's no official date set yet. Florentino Perez did say the Champions League reforms of 2024 wouldn't come soon enough, so at least before that is the goal.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

https://twitter.com/SamLee/status/1384486768729153544

Pep speaking truth

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

ShineboxPhil posted...

I dunno how would this even work?
Is it 2 home games and 2 away games against each team?
Will they relegate the weakest teams from each country and promote the league winners of each domestic league?
Or do they say fuck it and it's a league of own.

15 founder clubs plus 5 extra based on invitations, are divided in two competitions of ten each. They'll play home and away games. After that there's a knockout tournament. Top 3 of both competitions qualify for quarter finals, numbers 4 and 5 do play-offs for the remaining spots.

There's no qualification or promotion/relegation; the founder clubs decide who gets invited.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

1NfamousACE_2 posted...

As someone said, its all empty threats.

No one cares about Argentina, Portugal or Egypt if Messi, Ronaldo and Salah aren't playing.

The idea here is that the top players do care about playing in their domestic leagues and for their countries. This puts pressure on them to speak up against their own clubs' involvement in the ESL.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Good.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Must be easy to throw out the old 'now is not the time to talk politics in the wake of such a tragedy' when you're permanently in the wake of a tragedy.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

It's a disgusting cash grab by all these billionaire owned clubs. The current 7th and 9th placed teams in the Prem thinking they're entitled to permanent spots is ridiculous.

I'm glad at all the backlash this is getting. Uefa is even threatening to ban Super League players from participating in the Euros.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Yes, I too am empty inside.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Every time this is mentioned I can't help but think America just hates any sort of workers' rights. Why are so many people okay with being treated like shit by their employers?

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Cook it in a zero gravity oven so the cheese doesn't drip.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Swolebasaur

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Totally radical dude!

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Funkydog posted...

So you want to say "Cat" as "Shat" or "Chat" then?

I think the point here is that C, Q & X represent sounds that can be made with other letters, and are therefore superfluous. Cat could be just Kat. Ch, Sh and Th make unique sounds but don't get a unique symbol.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

I usually let anyone with 1 item skip, only exception is when they're being passive-aggressive about it. You know, like loudly sighing or clearing their throat to grab attention. I make sure to acknowledge them and then proceed to turn my back.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

GranolaPanic posted...

Are you serious?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.8.user=BarackObama

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

I am authorized to use physical force. You have 10 seconds to comply. Beep boop.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Tyranthraxus posted...

That is not correct. When you pay the creator, you make an agreement to not copy the game. You do not make an agreement to never lend out the game. Making a copy is breaking your promise / agreement, deception, and theft. It is immoral and disrespectful.

This is functionally equivalent to cheating on your spouse but then saying "eh they have no way of ever finding out so it's okay"

No it's still immoral even if your spouse never finds out.

You're conflating legality and morality. When I purchase a product the implied agreement is based on legality, not respect. You can buy a product and set it on fire. Entirely disrespectful to the creator but I wouldn't call it immoral.

A romantic relationship is the one based on respect instead of legality. It's not illegal to cheat on your partner, but definitely disrespectfuland immoral.

Let's not pretend these two types of 'agreements' are morally comparable.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Whether or not the creator knows about it has no bearing at all on the morality of the act.

I'd argue it matters A LOT if the argument heavily relies on the rights of the creator.

If the creator has no way of telling the difference between two scenarios (copy or borrowed) and the results in terms of revenue are indistinguishable (he gets paid only once) then it makes no sense to call only one of the scenarios disrespectful to him and therefore immoral. Either both are or neither is.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

Then in that case, they didn't buy the copies they sold. They are selling "unauthorized reproductions," which are a form of thievery. Because of copyright law, the only people authorized to make copies of something to then sell or distribute are the ones who own the copyright on that material.

Yes it's against the law. We're discussing morality, I'm entirely uninterested in discussing legality because we all agree on that.

The thing is, there's only one copy involved in that scenario. The instant you make another copy wthout permission from the creator, you are breaching the trust of the agreement and are now behaving immorally.

The question is why? What's so fundamentally morally wrong with making a copy? The end result for the creator is the exact same in all the scenarios: one person paid for it, and someone else enjoyed it without the creator being compensated a second time.

The creator has no way of knowing whether the second person is watching a burned DVD or a borrowed one. From their perspective there's no reason to think one is wrong and the other is fine.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

In these examples, somebody actually bought the game/movie involved.

Like I said in my previous post, this is also the case with piracy. The ripper buys the content once, and then shares copies.

Plus, for the most part, loaning or borrowing a game/movie from a friend is impermanent. If you want to own your own copy while your friend still has theirs, you have to buy it for yourself.

There are piracy services that allow the user to stream movies or live tv. The user doesn't become a permanent owner of the content in those cases, but it's still considered piracy.

Plus, the idea of borrowing from a friend implies that it's a physical copy, which isn't the issue. Stealing a physical copy is cut-and-dry theft in every scenario.

The argument was that enjoying the fruits of someones labor without being the one who paid for it was immoral. Whether the copy is physical or digital doesn't really matter in that regard.


---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

voldothegr8 posted...

In your examples people did get compensated once

That is usually the case with piracy as well. Someone pays for a movie or a game, rips it and shares the copies.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

Suddenly, you are enjoying the fruits of their labor without playing your expected role in the transaction. That becomes a moral problem because you're still using their product, but you aren't compensating them for their role in creating it.

While this does make sense, the exact same applies when you borrow a game from a friend. Or watch a DVD together that they purchased. Or when you buy a product second hand.

In all of these examples you get to enjoy the fruits of their labor, without the producers being compensated for it. Yet I don't think anyone would argue any of that is immoral. So surely this can't be the sole reason for piracy to be immoral.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

When you buy games from good developers, the money speaks for itself and incentivizes publishers (or even the developer itself) to make more games. If 10,000,000 people play the game, but none of them paid for it, then there's a huge fanbase but no incentive to make a sequel because it didn't bring in any revenue.

Paying for the results of a developer's labors helps the developer more than just the initial paycheck they got from working on the game. Plus, depending on the contract, some developers do get a cut of the game's sales going forward.

I agree with this sentiment in the general sense, and I do think this is a valid reason for people not to pirate content. However, we're discussing the morality here. Is depriving a company of potential revenue always immoral or does that only apply to piracy?

Let's say I publicly call for a boycott of a developer for whatever reason. Is that inherently immoral? What if a friend wants to buy their game and I tell him "don't, it sucks"? Both of these cases directly cost the developer's revenue.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

yet the person who enters the park w/o paying is going to cost the company that owns the park in the form of spent resources, or wear and tear on their property. it's theft of services.

No it isn't. It's probably trespassing, maybe breaking and entering depending how they get in. It's not stealing. Also, wear and tear obviously doesn't apply to piracy so I'm not sure why you'd add that to the analogy.

---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

would you sneak into a theme park or a museum and justify that as not being theft since you didn't actually "take" anyone's ticket away?

I didn't say it was justified, I'm saying that it isn't stealing. But to answer your question: no, I don't think anyone sneaking into a theme park should be charged with theft either.


---

In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.