Lurker > NatsuSama

UnfairRepresent posted...

You know that your daughter is going to look like her mother right?

Why do you think this is a given?

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

SuperVegitoFAN posted...

Boruto doesnt start out with the duo nerfed, its..

Nah, they start off nerfed.

Theres abilities they had in Shippuden thats never used in Boruto. The movie, The Last had Naruto flying around Goku style, him shooting a rasenbeam, and Sasuke destroying a big ass boulder casually. Not to mention the scale of destruction in the original series was massively greater.

The Boruto series, there's that chapter Kurama calls out Naruto for being out of practice, and the only improvements we see out of him is Kurama being more free, and the Kamikaze Kurama form. Sasuke didn't improve any of the 6 paths powers, and only improve his teleporting power....barely.

The recent events just nerfed them even more.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Guide posted...

username checks out

Lol

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Why do people like Summer, or call this time of the year, "good weather"?

This is probably going to be an unpopular opinion, but God I find Summer to be the worst season of the year. It's fucking hot andor humid. This time of the year (at least where I live), it's dreadful weather. Have to pump the AC on blast to sleep and even then I'm tossing and turning all night. On humid days I get hives from the heat making more uncomfortable.

To those who love this weather, please educate this heathen sweat mother of mercy....why?

/rant. Just spent a day with my gf hiking for the anniversary (something she wanted, promised I'd go). Needed somewhere to rant about this dreadful day. Hiking is fine, the heat though, I just cant.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Ratchetrockon posted...

Are sasuke and naruto nerfed in boruto?

Hard nerfed

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Slayer_22 posted...

81 degrees is hot to you, TC?

Definitely hot to me.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

The religious nonexistent figures Adam and Eve?
Or two people in history named Adam and Eve?

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

FunkyCat posted...

The "ah you criticise society while also being IN society, interesting!" Argumemt was always shit

Why? Because it has shows the hypocrisy of strolling in on a high horse?

TC claims some moral high ground for not eating animals and how much eating them causes global warming. Or that life is treasured. Yet people like the TC find reasons to ignore the life of the plants and sometimes insects they eat, or the animal byproduct common item they likely use. Some probably don't even know they use products that were created with animal byproduct.....or rather don't want to know.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

JoelMiller95 posted...

Meats eaters that say they're selfish will always get more respect from me than cowards that make stupid excuses to justify eating meat.

Spare me the sally sob story and the high horse you rode in on.

Do you support the eating of insects and plants? Why is their life less valuable than a chicken or fish?
Do you own a car or ride an automobile? Fun fact, there's animal byproduct in it. You monster!

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Josiah_Is_Back posted...

Kinda of assuming based off a picture alone.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Dakimakura posted...

At least they used gender neutral pronouns at the bottom.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

I agree it's the employers responsibility to pay minimum

I dont think its necessary to tell someone to get another though. If you aren't going to tip them, then just take what you paid for and leave. Unless ofc they want to try to hassle you .....

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Will_VIIII posted...

I don't have kids tho

Read the last post thoroughly. Hint, it doesnt pertain to only kids.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Will_VIIII posted...

You can really tell who ITT lies through omission on well known deal breakers on their profile.

FTFY

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Will_VIIII posted...

You can easily flip the question around on single parents. "Why don't those who have an issue with me having children say so in their profile"

Because like I said, I've seen many women outright say on their profile if you have children it's a deal breaker and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

There is no sound defense to flipping it around.

A dating profile shouldn't be a laundry of things you don't want. Especially well known deal breakers. Your weak defense says if I made a profile, I'd need to list shit ton of common and obvious things that'd likely have 99.99% swiping left simply based on the oddity of doing such a thing. Sounds like a very terrible ass profile to drop a laundry list of things you don't want in a woman (or man).

"Oh your profile should have specified you don't date wanted felons or not caught murderers or not caught treasonous scum. It's not my fault you didn't ask if I ever robbed a bank or murdered my ex boyfriend and the police never found out it was me. "
Example btw, as the point is hiding well known deal breakers.

Intentionally hiding information that is no secret to be a deal breaker shows you were intentionally hiding information. Hoping this can stay in the closet long enough and possibly not matter later down the road to someone who may or may not find it a deal breaker.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Will_VIIII posted...

I guess I can't wrap my head around your being inconvenienced.

Asking the question and getting an answer immediately is not an inconvenience, don't be ridiculous.

If you outright state you don't want to date someone with children and they match with you, and it gets to where you meet up only to find they lied then yes, I would concede that is a legitimate inconvenience. However, this is an unlikely scenario.

Just put the disclaimer in your profile dude, that's gonna prevent these inconveniences.

Why hide it in the first place?

If you know it's a deal breaker, as this is no secret, why intentionally hide it?

Why should someone else have to fish a known deal breaker out of you?

It shows you were hoping this little deal breaker doesn't come out too early.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

BloodMoon7 posted...

thot BEGONE

Lol

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

inTaCtfuL posted...

The downside is that half the country is now after your ass after you struck their god.

Not worried about them. I live in the DMV area. People from all creeds hate Trump in the DMV area.

Bring it on, they will quickly learn Cult 45 isn't the only folks with guns.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

FarFromFields posted...

He's not defending himself in any way? The old shit head might literally die, idk how I feel about punching a former president to death.

He's a "big strong alpha" he can take whatever your throw at him! At least that's what cult 45 always tells everyone.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Sounds like a dream come true. I'd even do it for free provided I still get the no repercussions lol.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Guide posted...

Surprised so many of us don't drink coffee.

Coffee is disgusting IMO. I dont even like the smell.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Deal. I dont drink coffee and the topic doesn't say I have to drink cofee.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

skermac posted...

Why does it matter?

Which are you asking?
Why does it matter if some already have children...
Or
Why does it matter that it's not listed...

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Looked gf posted...

https://i.imgur.com/mJGP1oA.jpg

Lol

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

I ask this out of 100% ignorance. Why are pitbulls hated by so many?

Are tragedies like this common?

Disclaimer: I don't own dogs, and haven't had interest to research them.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Depends.

Did she intentionally tape and leak it?
Was this tape recent?

If the answer is yes to both questions, she I wouldn't marry her. Not into the idea of potentially filming myself.

You do you, but not into starring in porn, or worrying about my girlfriend leaking some tape if she gets upset.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted...

Again, if you want to know if they have kids when you match with them ask.

I'd say it's information they should be volunteering.

If it's not on your profile, you should be volunteering this information in chats/talks, it shows you are deliberately hiding something that is a well known deal breaker.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted...

By this logic you should be forced to reveal your salary, your health issues, your mental health issues, your criminal record, the list of people you have slept with etc.

Imagine thinking you're entitled to learn everything about someone in a paragraph on a dating site.

Imagine being confused when your potential life partner isn't interested after you drop the bombshell of currently raising kids.

Jumping into a possible relationship, the dynamic of kids are a major factor. How this man or woman will treat your child, will the child like your life partner, how they interact, the potential threat having to support these children, etc. Children in the mix isn't a trivial matter.

General salary is already often on the profile based on their job title. We may not get exact numbers, but you can kinda of get an idea if they include their job title.

You're reaching with the who you slept with in the past.

The only ones you have a sound argument on that isn't done already is current health/mental issues that could affect the relationship, and any serious criminal records. Which ya, I like many others might lose interest if it's damming.

You want to hide it, go right ahead. My only point is don't throw on the shocked Pikachu face if after you drop that bombshell, they aren't interested anymore. Kids in the mix isn't a trivial matter.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

pogo_rabid posted...

If someone tells you this, they're either lying or completely delusional.

It's used for both. Not suggesting people to use Tinder for a meaningful relationship. Just saying there's plenty of stories of long relationships from tinder.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

SaquonDaGod posted...

TC is right. Not sure why people are salty about this topic.

If youre hiding the fact that you have kids thats shady Thats a major aspect to any relationship and at best it shows that youre ashamed of being a parent.

This.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Zikten posted...

One Piece is literally the most popular currently running anime in the world. It's been going since the late 90s I think. Or that is when the manga began at least. It's about pirates and the main character is all stretchy like rubber

Popularity depends on region.

In Japan it's the most popular anime.

It's not the most popular in the US. It's popularity in the US has been on a rapid decline since around 2010.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

pegusus123456 posted...

god got her ass whooped by a dead dude

If a dead dude beat anyone's ass, they're magical.....

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

What stops magic users from getting richer or stealing my money?

No deal.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Change the topic constantly.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

gunplagirl posted...

Ah yes, the minority being discriminated against is the instigator. Not the ones who go out of their way to remind us they want us banned from sports, public bathrooms, the dating pool, and so on.

Shut the hell up.

So something you have convinced yourself then.

As I see no one in this topic arguing this.

Let me guess, anyone who isn't open to having sex with a transgendered must agree with Republican values, everything they push?

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Didn't read anything except the title.

Condemn and move on.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

If she wants to sure, not gonna lie, it's a turn on. With that said, I'd let her know upfront I'm not into going down myself. So please dont do it, wanting it back in return.

On that same note, I wouldn't be out with some random girl in the first place.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

This is so incredibly stupid to advertise it's almost funny lol.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

CyricZ posted...

Neither case is in the present. It's all in the past. Which would imply that you have a particular bias against trans women. This is not me calling you names, this is what you are showing.

A past that tries to pretends a transwoman is the same as a ciswoman. They objectively are not the same.

A ciswomans body has capabilities that a transwoman does not have.

CyricZ posted...

Mmkay, point to where I said "you are obligated to have sex with a trans woman otherwise you're a bigot". Or even words approaching that.

What other purpose is there to your post?

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

CyricZ posted...

You wouldn't be having sex with a person as what they were born as. You'd be having sex as who they are now. Would you be less attracted to a woman if you learned she used to be fat? Or had two noses (but now one)?

Penis gone now doesn't change a penis WAS there lol. It doesnt change the sex you were born as was male.

Your ciswoman examples are terrible examples. A born female being fat in the past would still be a woman who was born the sex of a female.

What you are now doesn't change the past, and not all past are created equal.

CyricZ posted...

Please, point to the post where I said "you must have sex with a trans woman otherwise you're a bigot". Or even words approaching that.

My exact words were, "why do you think a person must feel obligated to have sex with someone who use to have a dick?"

I said nothing of the word "must" in the sense of having 0 choice in who to have sex with. Your argument is one should feel obligated/open to dtf a transgendered.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

averagejoel posted...

being incorrectly assigned "male" at birth does not make someone a man

You were not "incorrectly assigned" the sex, male, if you were born with just a penis.

That's you ignoring science for the sake of feelings.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

QueenCarly posted...

trans women were not at any point in their life men

That's objectively not true.

If you popped out your mom with just a dick, sorry your sex was male. You wanting to be female or feeling like a female doesn't change what sex you were born as.

Converting to a female later also doesn't erase history to make you a ciswoman.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

CyricZ posted...

Like I said.

Fear of the Phantom Penis.

This fall. On Bravo.

Better question is why do you think a person must feel obligated to have sex with someone who use to have a dick?

You keep saying "phantom penis" while ignoring facts. Saying that doesn't change what a person was born as. Nor does it condemn transgendered people to having no rights.

You specifically want men who aren't into having sex with someone born a man, to have sex with a woman who used to be a man.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

MutantJohn posted...

If you're "straight", you will have sex with a trans person otherwise you're a bigot.

Transwomen are literally women. Stop being hateful.

This kind of logic lol.

A transwoman is not the same thing as a ciswoman. One was born female at birth, the other wasn't. Pretending they are exactly the same is just factually not true.

A trans person can love, exist, call themselves whatever, and have the same rights. However this idea that they are the exactly the same as a cis woman is objectively and factually not true.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

Those breast are too big, so not my type of woman anyway. I'd just walk away.

If I knew her I'd tell her then you probably shouldn't wear something purposely showing them off. You clearly want people to look at them. That profile picture says it all.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

MachineJaipur posted...

To be fair, American media drives this home a lot. Combine that with religious folks of America being all "you can't have sex with a person unless you're married/in love" and it's easy to see how America has some ass backwards views regarding love. "Oh they love them? That must mean they wanna fuck!"

I agree, that's why I said it's an American twisted mindset.

I definitely know all cultures around the world...but I've seen cultures of for examples "bros" that here in America folks who think they are "gay" simply for being so close. Hell simply caring about your best friends well being to a certain threshold in our culture can be warped into talks that there might be sexual attraction going on.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

@Evol

Please watch this video. Marvel is intentionally queerbaiting and dropping hints of gay romance.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=CSBTiA0Wtmo&feature=emb_title

I just see a video proving my point that Americans in particular don't know the concept of two human beings loving each other strictly platonic. NOT sexual.

You absolutely must have secret desires have sexual relations with any human you show emotionally attachment to.

Being close to another person doesn't mean they are DTF. Nor does it mean there's baiting of any kind involved. That is strictly you and this culture warping it into a sexual agenda.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

TommyG663513 posted...

another question

Remember that seemingly white man who committed a mass shooting in Colorado a few months ago? Remember when they released an image of him being arrested and he looked like a white male so there were tons of tweets going out talking about how dangerous white men are and they are the new terrorists? Even Kamala Harris's daughter tweeted out about how dangerous white men are and they're the greatest terrorist threat in the country.

Then the shooters name is released the next day and he has a super middle eastern sounding name and the guy is an immigrant from Syria. All of a sudden, all of the white terrorist comments get deleted and people pretend it never happened.

So yes left wing people after they denounced the term terrorist in the years following 9/11 are now doing what they can to apply the term to white people and avoid applying it to anyone else.

This entire post one big mental gymnastics.

For starters Muslim isn't a race. You used the Colorado shooter to highlight him being Muslim and not white. Syrians are generally Caucasians. People like you confuse Muslim for race. Highlighting him being Muslim doesn't make him not a Caucasian anymore.

Second, no one denounced calling the 9/11 terrorist, terrorist. You're making shit up with your victim complex.

Lastly, calling actual terrorist, terrorist isn't a political leaning statement to have.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

TommyG663513 posted...

That those people were spouting off opinions of the establishment left as opposed to the progressive left. Do you understand the difference?

That you have no actual point in spouting nonsense to redirect? Yes.

Calling this woman a terrorist and calling you out for trying to play the usual sympathy card isn't a political leaning statement.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT

ButteryMales posted...

I don't know. @TommyG663513 said they know you and your alignment.

He said that because he has no real rebuttal to why all of a sudden now that the terrorist is white, we need to show sympathy. Or his baseless claim of she's being called a terrorist with "glee."

I dont have a history here of championing all progressive values. He's using the fishhook theory of anyone not championing sympathy for a cult 45 member must be a progressive, socialist, or whatever the flavor of the month left wing label.

---

WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT