Lurker > Fluttershy

no way what a story

yeah, i feel like i've short-circuited you. tempted to call mercy.

yeah, you're done. dwell on this L. really think about it, you could learn something.

define your stance first and i'll answer your question lmao

you don't understand that you don't get to ask anything until you come through with a little something yourself. because until then you haven't proven you're not operating in bad faith.

you're a little too eager. clipping off all the context to my posts just makes you look desperate.

i'm not answering posts directed to other people just because you're sealioning. again, brandolini's law. you want to bullshit your way out of this and that involves demanding i put in more effort than you.

you're really bad at this.

lol, back to the meltdown thing. is ad hominem after that? you have like no material and you weren't ready for any of this.

i posted my stance

What about cutscenes
What if they want to tell a story though
Not always viable

this is not a stance. this is you driving by and saying 'no you're wrong,' because you're trying to talk about something you don't understand.

no, they weren't addressed to me lmao. respond to mine, and define your stance.

i mean, if anyone's dodging, it's you. and you have been, the whole time. do i have to reiterate the carpet metaphor or not.

you're literally just imitating me back to me and hoping something sticks. i've never seen someone more out of material and out of their depth.

yikes. you can't talk about turn order, remember? you're still first in line to define your stance. chop chop.

unless you're chicken, of course. if you can admit to that i can respect it. but if you keep living this lie i can't.

all that 'being afraid to actually make one' tells me otherwise lol. define your point unless you're chicken.

i could refute any argument you make, but you refuse to make any.

you keep saying you've 'called it' because you can't handle being served all these losses by a brony. you're out of your depth dude. you simply do not have the wit to bullshit on internet forums.

you are actually doing mental gymnastics to convince yourself that this wasn't ridiculously one-sided.

they're not.

post 4 6 8 actually

not the same argument at all. you invented it in post 89 and you think i owe you an answer to that before you owe me an answer to like, post 10. that's not how it works. you're so bad at this.

that argument showed up in post 89. you have your thing to sort out first -- want to talk about being genuine. fuck's sake, dude, turn order. you owe me two apologies now. one for insulting me, and another for being this inept.

like, no. you don't get to invent something eighty posts later and demand i answer it when you haven't answered something eighty posts ago. are you serious? are you that desperate?

it's pretty bad when the other guy literally has to tell himself he won.

again, you're imitating me. i've given you ample opportunity to define your position and you won't. it tells us that you just showed up to be contrarian and that you thought your capacity for bullshit would carry you. the last forty posts tell us just how well that went.

nah, you still have your point to define. you don't get to ask effort out of me that you refuse to put forth. brandolini's law.

stop trying to engineer gotchas out of a situation you jumped into with nothing. it's embarrassing.

again, you're imitating me. what did i tell you about that?

you said i didn't express disagreement and now you're saying i am. your shit is out of order lol. give up, you're tired.

you ran away from ever defining your point, a carpet i keep laying out for you even now, by the way. you can go ahead and do that.

we've been over that. you posting no-effort one-sentence nothings is not definition of any point. are you going to retry everything else? going to accuse me of ad hominem again and then another meltdown?

if you're capable of discussion go ahead and define your point.

also, what's stereotypical about me, exactly? i'm picturing this world where you just lose every argument with every brony.

i did and i continue to. you just have no interest in the subject.

fuck yeah jjk

i might actually make a ryomen sukuna build in dark souls and just be *the biggest* asshole

i didn't avoid the topic i literally invited you to define your point. just stop.

also again -- you going the 'you owe me an apology' route is imitation and it's making me feel like i'm bullying you because you are so strapped for material that you are stealing mine. so stop please!

if your interests truly are in the subject please, divulge your take finally. i am laying the carpet down for you again. if you just want to shitpost and try to last-word me, do that instead, but don't lie about it. okay?

i'm not totally averse to your point, tc, but instant respawns present balance issues. in a game like tf2, it could theoretically mean instant class switching too.

this would promote a strategy that people would probably not wanna learn. like i want to play a sniper. i don't want to have to jump to demo just because that's the read.

i've invited you to actually define your point multiple times and you won't. also, just because i wasn't nice doesn't excuse you from not actually backing up your claim -- so you got nothing there, as well.

it's so sad when they last-word you. you just want one gotcha and it's not coming.

hey, hey. don't have a melty, okay?

i'm pretty sure there was a marth that was all about how all you had to do was have a nice shield.

tell him i'm gonna bust him up

i don't think i need to outright say 'please explain your point in detail' and you're operating in bad faith to say that i do. be done now. god.

My mother is in her 70s and smokes weed everyday.

hell yeah

It depends on the game. For some games spectating can be fun like wrestling games or fighting games.

would you play a fighting game where you couldn't control the fighter?

they do, because nowhere in any of your posts did you attempt a discussion about story

wrong, i tried to get you to define your point, and i keep trying and you won't. i couldn't lay down a nicer red carpet for you to divulge your ideas and you just apparently don't have any.

at this point you're just trying for a last word you're satisfied with. it's not coming. just go to bed lol.

no they don't lol.

marth 1v1 me when the servers come back. you can bring a max level. if i win, i get all your algo.

it's really not my central point though. my central point is that you've contributed literally nothing.

recall you're the one who started whining about ad hominems in the first place. it was your internet buzzword parachute that didn't deploy quite correctly. and then you tried saying i was having a melty. does that mean you're going to try that one again too?

you keep invoking actually having a discussion about story but you ignore all my invitations for you to actually do that. i wonder why.

you're kinda fixating on one part of a post and it's kinda making it obvious that you're just hoping for a gotcha so you can save face.

you really suck at this.

you can game an elemental materia really early on and you can be screwing around with that before you're done with the midgar escape sequence.

man the ineptitude of accusing me of jumping to ad hominem while only a comma later telling me i live up to a stereotype -- that sure is something.

i didn't disagree with you because it was an invitation to get you to actually define your point. which you can't, or else you would have by now. i don't need to refute a point you haven't made. you need to actually contribute a point before anyone can do that lol.

wow.

oh the posts where you said what if what if no can't be done. yeah, such insight and contribution. be done already oh my god.

maybe trying to say i'm having a meltdown will work if you try it again. oh my god dude. you didn't have anything for the actual subject and you don't have anything to get out of a dumb internet argument. just be done or actually go ahead and support the point, like a million posts later.

if you're so interested in this discussion, participate in it, like i've been trying to get you to since the start of this. if you even have the capability. do you have the capability? i don't think you do. you could actually prove me wrong here.

i didn't attempt saying you weren't worthwhile, i straight-up did that.

and you've vindicated me on that read by having absolutely nothing to support your original claim.

the one thing i attempted was getting you to actually support your claim. you didn't do it. can we be done?

you still havn't apologised for insulting me

please don't copy me. i know you have no material of your own, but if you start making it this obvious, people will realize i'm being a bully and i don't want that.

apparently trying to get someone to explain themselves means you're triggered. probably only if they can't.

kloe just admit you spoke out of your anus.

Alright brony bounce

block me.

you said it wasn't always viable and you never did anything to support that claim.

i already replied to that. says me.

yes, that was your invitation to actually present an argument, and you didn't. we've been over this. are you trying to buy time or something?

like can you just stop already? do you have some other forum buzzword to throw at me since neither brony, ad hominem, or meltdown worked? it's so painful to watch someone be this clumsy.

i hate how dark souls fans tend to be that way, being a huge fan of the series myself.

when i said 'says who?' that was your invitation. we've been over this. take a deep breath lol.

but also you should really apologize for calling me a stereotype. that's Fucked Up.

hey, don't melt down, okay. calm down and behave. are you done now?

lol dude is tilt. all you had to do was support your argument and not just be a drive-by contrarian. why you gotta shitpost fam.

i think all the brokenness in ff2, 7, 8, tactics speaks for their possibility space. but i'm going to throw out mystic quest as one i think has potential too. it's ahead of its time in a lot of ways -- no random encounters and no game overs.

i think they whiffed on realizing that the player could have more influence on turn order if they just made axes carry a huge speed penalty.

i really want to get ahold of an ffmq hackster. assuming anyone knows what ffhackster is on CE.

I have the Op blocked so I cant even see

lol.

I dont respond to any tags

lol.

all i've done is point out that you have nothing. that's not an insult, it's a statement of fact. you can go ahead and prove it wrong at any time.

i've been trying to get you to discuss this since i showed up but you obviously have no intent of that. can you be done now?

calm down and behave yourself.

also -- lol. i think you owe me an apology for calling me a brony as an insult before you can say anything like that. especially that 'stereoptypical brony' remark. you are obviously very pissed off. perhaps take a breather. or maybe just learn to walk away when you're not gonna win.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/79901138

i would go into that topic and answer it is the first thing i'd do

i'm really not the one having a melty here lol. it's like you know you are and that's why you were so quick to drop that m-bomb. because calling me a brony and accusing me of ad hominem didn't work.

my attempt invited you actually discussing the subject material and you didn't do it, because you can't.

can you be done?