Lurker > Ryangrad

Wow is right.

Maybe

MedeaLysistrata posted...

He was a president, he has to be good

...

The conspiracy theorist still never believes the official story no matter what. That's why the believe it's a conspiracy.

This is more like, "the conspiracy theorists got a good one here."

Tyranthraxus posted...

It means the official story is obviously a cover up.

Wouldn't a conspiracy theorist not believe the official story?

Tyranthraxus posted...

lmfao you have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe the official story here.

What's that supposed to mean?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80309809

You can tell just looking at him that he's no lazybones.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

The image loaded for me after a while, no she does not look like a video game character so TC still failed

Can you repost it here? It's coming up nothing on this end.

It's blank. Nothing shows up.

That's not something that I would ever do. But download the pic that was messages to you and you can print it anywhere.

https://photo.walgreens.com/store/walgreens-photo-app

Don't give those garbage people any ideas.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80152501

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/1/2/AAZ4PBAAECuA.png

One where you lie about your poll answer and one where you tell the true?

viewmaster_pi posted...

fuck yes, AB...FAB...

no... it doesn't really work :/

Absolutely Fabulous?

What kind of haphazzard deflection is this?

Every bit of what you're saying is wrong.

First, the militarization of police has nothing to do with demonstrations in France. The militarization began way before there was any thing like this happening.

Second, this isn't happening right now. That video from France is 2 years old. Not that it matters much.

Evening_Dragon posted...

Are y'all literally just looking at the topic title and my post and that's it?

If you quoted a post that piqued your interest that had nothing to do with the topic title which one was it? If you didn't, what post were you referring to if not the Topic Title and Opening Post?

Steffenfield posted...

Anyone here know a way to check in on him?

That previous episode he posted could be terminal.

He's posting in this topic. He's Future Ruins.

DeadBankerDream posted...

Wait wait wait wait. Hold the fuck on.

The dude behind the desk is also the reporter on scene? What the fuck is this shit? This is groundbreaking stuff.

That surprisingly took my focus as well. Does he do the weather too?

I love it when someone accuses me of being someone elses alt. Really helps seal in the fact that they lost and are hella coping. Melty day all day for TC.

ZangsBeard posted...

Oh look, deflection. Like no one saw that coming.

You really do have a hard time with basic comprehension? Makes sense why you complain about being asked to donate to a free website.

TC is getting BTFO in both of his topics at the same time. This is his Christmas gift, I guess.

Not in the top 10, but still on the top 100 list. Fairly common.

Nice.

Irony posted...

Who is John Eastman

One of Trump's crooked lawyers.

He literally teased this first?

https://news.sky.com/story/america-needs-a-superhero-donald-trump-teases-major-announcement-on-truth-social-12768463

Holy shit. This is madness.

COVxy posted...

The statement is very mild when you take it in context. Realistically, the press was always going to be negative about any actual animal research because it's easy to drive negative sentiment.

The statement from the scientists that complained?

People need to read the original article before responding. The scientist working on the experiments complained that Musk wanted them to speed up too much and do too many things at once. They are needlessly killing animals due to mistakes being made from rushing things. The results can't even be used in those instances and the animals have to be put down because rushing and doing it wrong with exploratory surgeries proves to be worthless.

I remember her from being anti-vax.

Still, R.I.P.

Cancer is bullshit.

No they didn't. That was literally one of the main reasons CE urged people to get out to vote.

A_Good_Boy posted...

I've never made either, but it's a lot more work slicing a potato into french fries than it is to chop an onion into onion rings.

It takes a single push through a potato slicer to cut the tater. Several pushes through the mandolin for the onion.

No pic?

Republican Liz Cheney who has an axe to grind with Trump but is still a Republican wants to focus just on Trump? Whaaa?!!!

HorrorReturns posted...

That 70s Show

I think the drug use and sex would have to disqualify that show. All Red does is berate his son and his friends.

And that crazy Canadian girl.

NeoShadowhen posted...

Is there anything to suggest that the firing was related to what was tweeted? Seems just as likely from the context musk was mentioning that he was already fired.

We'll no surprise that you would take that position. But you're wrong, as usual.

Tank a competitor in order to buy them? Seems like a move that would have been illegal if this were regulated...unless you're Elon Musk.

Flockaveli posted...

This is supposed to be a celebration.

FigureOfSpeech posted...

Alright then. Let's resume the celebration.

https://youtu.be/3GwjfUFyY6M

FigureOfSpeech posted...

I'm talking about annoying account gimmicks. Bigotry is a separate conversation and I haven't seen that kind of shit from Trickfinger so the other one is worse overall. Anti-trans attacks aren't a gimmick and I was talking about annoying gimmicks. Hopefully this clarifies it for you so you don't have an aneurysm trying to nitpick about my post.

Alright, well gimmicks come in all forms. Some people have a gimmick of being a disgusting person. No need for the shit response you added at the end. It was a legit question, not an attack. We're cool, bro.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

Re-read what he stated. He doesn't mention anything specific besides trickfinger's gimmicks. Because both users are known for hateful and offensive posts.

Why are you even commenting on this? I asked him a question, and you're bending over backwards trying to make up some logic when it's completely unnecessary and he can respond if he wants to or not. You're adding nothing of substance here.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

When they're both posting horribly offensive shit, the line for deciding who's worse comes down to who does it in the most annoying fashion.

Literally not what was said though.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

It's not like trickfinger doesn't say extremely offensive shit, too. He's frequently suspended for his posts.

But that's not what he said he had a problem with. He said it was the daddy/zaddy thing that was worse.

FigureOfSpeech posted...

I'm not sure which one annoys me more. Trickfinger did that daddy zaddy nonsense which was worse than a lot of mfbk's trolling, but Trickfinger also had funny reactions to his alt being called "swag net zero" so that puts them closer to even.

You think that annoying shit from Trickfinger is worse than the anti-trans attacks that MFBK puts out?

So the businesses in the area are okay with him, but the local Fox News affiliate is trying to get him kicked out?

Was that money shot pic of her real?