Lurker > StealThisSheen

FunWithAFryPan posted...

Hes trying to make the Snyder movies seem less bad by comparison. Its not going to work because those movies are dog shit.

He said this before the Snyder movies even existed.

This is literally from over 11 years ago when he was replying to movie takes from people on Facebook.

Evening_Dragon posted...

Don't be dumb, this is my phone alt. My main is literally right in the sig.

Yeah, you're right, my bad.

So now your post REALLY makes sense.

LonelyStoner posted...

Just close the board at this point. Dont give Fandom the satisfaction of saying We tried.

Is there a reason you seem upset by this?

Good.

Baha05 posted...

Pretty much this though in this case it was a two part problem mainly from InGen fucking around and finding out with its stupid military plans but also the one part that didnt make sense was the idea of people being bored of Dinosaurs or having to create hybrids to fill a niche

To be fair, the latter makes sense if you assume that, in the Jurassic Park/World universe, Jurassic World/Park/whatever has been famous for so long without incident that... People are actually getting bored of it. And, to be fair, that's logical, in universe, since... It's not like a theme park where you can just create faster, better rollercoasters. They quite literally try to apply that logic, by creating more interesting dinosaurs, and it just... obviously backfires.

The first one worked because it was, literally, what the creators of Jurassic Park envisioned achieving, in the first place, and it basically served as an example... Even if you think literally everything has gone right, it can STILL go wrong.

Dakimakura posted...

Considering the fan got ejected for getting a ball thrown at him I doubt they would have let him keep said ball.

I know, I'm being facetious.

It's very telling that, somehow, the fan who had a ball thrown at them got ejected.

SiO4 posted...

Thank you Kind Sir!!
Very Cool.

Yep. I know about it, firsthand, because, to this day, they have the parking spaces where the fallen students lay marked off by lighted pillars.

Just a small correction, as an alumni

The shooting was at Kent State, in Ohio. Not Ohio State.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I support this, too. The entire reason Scott's Tots, for example, is so cringey, is because... Beyond S1, you just basically fall in love with the characters, and you WANT them to succeed, for the most part. You don't really get that from season 1, because it took time for them to find their groove. Similarly, Parks and Rec is a great show, but its first season is also kinda tough to get through, and it doesn't become great until Rob Lowe and Adam Scott join in season 2.

rexcrk posted...

I hate how much of a meme it became for people to find Scotts Tots tOo CriNgEy To WatCh. Its a hilarious episode and its totally unrealistic which is part of what makes it funny.

See, to me, what makes Scott's Tots so cringey is that it's NOT unrealistic.

A younger Michael being so incredibly idealistic that he made an actual money pledge that, when the time came, he actually couldn't follow up on, feels incredibly realistic, and the cringe part comes in where you can just literally see him breaking down, as a character, since he has no idea how to explain that he failed and didn't live up to his own ideals.

And, like somebody said, it's not necessarily a bad cringe. You're, basically, cringing right along with Michael, as he cringes at himself by realizing he never met his life goal.

I read literally nothing else but your initial post, and for one reason or another, it made me feel like listening to

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KicjYWFdCNY

Zikten posted...

Shit. I hope this isn't true

By all means, me too. It just feels like it's headed that way, since everybody is being cooperative EXCEPT them.

divot1338 posted...

Id have kept the ball.

Same. The fan should have just held on to it. I imagine you could get a decent penny for "Live game ball Pat Bev nailed random woman in the face with!" on eBay.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


You're missing the context that TC previously complained about the other thing being patched out, meaning they're being dishonest with this topic. They're being obtuse, on purpose.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Here's the context:

Stellar Blade patched out certain things, such as a graffiti/sign placement that, effectively, spelled out an offensive term.

Given TC's history, including complaining about that instance being patched out, it makes it clear that they're now mocking said thing being patched out, by making this topic about a randomly generated password.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


The gameplay made me play the sequels, and I absolutely loved them. To this day, the original is the only one I've only completed once and have no desire to ever complete again, in LARGE part because of how it handles things after that chapter.

Half of the game is incredible.

Then you basically have to play the same game four more times.

And then you get to a fantastic ending.

But oh god is getting to that ending a real drag.

What an utter misstep.

MagiMarthKoopa posted...

They should have patched that one out when they did Hard R

I tried to search Twitter to see if anyone was talking about it but zero results?

strange

...Are you really so mad about them patching stuff out that you thought this topic was worth making? So weird.

Yeah, he absolutely deserves to be punished. He threw the ball, missed his target... A fan POLITELY tossed the ball back, and he threw the ball AT the fan who tossed it back.

Fuck that noise.

divot1338 posted...

Isnt an emotional support animal supposed to stay with you?

Presumedly, the hotel/BnB/whatever didn't allow such an animal to be inside, and it was reported Wally was placed in a fenced in area outside on the property, where he couldn't have escaped on his own. Thus, the thought is somebody took him out of that area while the owner was inside. It's currently being reported that "pranksters" effectively stole the animal from the enclosure and left it outside of somebody's property, and that person called animal control, because, well... They saw an alligator on their property.

The person who called animal control is, reportedly, being extremely cooperative. It's the government animal control agency that is apparently refusing to help. Likely because they killed the animal, instead of relocating it, like they say they do, and just don't want to admit it.

boomgetchopped3 posted...

Is it just me or is this happening more often?

It's not necessarily happening more often, as much as it's being reported more often. Previously, there was a stigma that made boys/men less likely to report being sexually assaulted/harassed/whatever by women, but that stigma is slowly going away, which means such instances are being reported much more often than they used to be.

I don't, personally, but I get people that do. If they think it's too dangerous to go out, themselves, but delivery services have drivers who decide to drive, regardless... Why not use the service? It's not like you're making them do it. Door Dash isn't some kind of contract where you MUST do deliveries on a certain day or point of time. But, yes, you should tip well in such a scenario.

Women Become Teachers Because It's a Kink (tm)

I wish this was a joke, and obviously I don't mean ALL, or even most, but... Certain ones absolutely are, at this point.

TheSavageDragon posted...

Your experience doesn't stack up to Allen straight up saying the meme was now allowed though. I remember it clearly because I found it amusing that it was now allowed seeing as I got banned for it a little while before. Should be somewhere around 2011-2012 that the change happened as I got hit for it in 2010 IIRC.
And I'm talking about the specific "I am 12 and what is this" meme, not similar posts and such.

KookyCouture posted...

It has been allowed under Allen's reign due to it's meme status, so was claiming to be ridiculously underaged like stating you were a baby or something, I guess Fandom are not screwing around with any of that though

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I stand corrected. I guess maybe I didn't notice it because it was mainly allowed when it was like, BLATANTLY obvious somebody was posting a dumb meme, whereas the edge cases still got modded more often than not.

Yeah, given TC's history, this is either absolutely bait, or they're just a terrible person who shouldn't own animals, to begin with.

TheSavageDragon posted...

No, not exactly. "I am 12 and what is this" is what I got hit for and that was allowed about a year after I got banned for it. Now it's not allowed again.

See, in my experience, this isn't true. I don't think it's ever actually been allowed, because I'd say I've probably seen somebody get banned for it almost on an average of atleast once per year, the entire time I've been here. Like I said, I've seen people make such posts and get away with it, in certain situations, such as being on a smaller board where nobody would mark them, or being in a busier topic where it got overlooked.

EDIT: Unless you're referring to being able to get it overturned, but I also feel like that's always been the case, and the ones that didn't get it overturned just weren't willing to try, or put in the effort to do so, likely since they probably already had an alt, anyway.

TheSavageDragon posted...

Can confirm, did get a ban for this until I got it overturned by showing Allen my ID >_>

Yep. I've been coming to GameFAQs since leading up to release of Sonic Adventure 2, which brought me to GameFAQs to begin with, and I've always seen people get banned for such a thing, unless they proved otherwise, the entire time I've been here.

Trumble posted...

It wasn't the case for a while. Actually being underage or plausible claims of it would get you blocked (but with a chance to restore your account by proving your age); but clear jokes were fine. Now anything is an immediate ban with no opportunity to reverse it.

This is not true, it's literally always been bannable. I've seen people get banned over it for over 20 years. If you made such a joke and didn't get banned, you were just lucky and nobody actually marked it.

Evening_Dragon posted...

You make it sound like people are being forced into the bar or something

They're not, but they should also be able to freely enjoy a bar without, you know, having to give up literally their one lifeline to easy help/safety. There's a reason this is not a common thing.

EDIT:
User Info: Evening_Dragon

1. Elite
2. User Since: Sep 2011
3. Karma: 726

Oh, wait. Now I get it.

No, this sounds incredibly dumb. This isn't a concert, where phones can actually hurt other people's enjoyment.

Spoilers: If somebody would rather be on their phone than actually converse with you, the problem is you, not the phone.

Literally taking away somebody's ability to call for help/reach assistance to leave a situation in a literal bar is just... Crazy.

Nah, it should absolutely be a felony. We absolutely need to punish corporations more, yes, but that doesn't mean we need to lessen the penalty on other people willingly doing it, too.

GUNTHER posted...

I don't understand why grapefruit is getting a bad rep here. It's a super fruit that should be part of a balanced diet.

I mean, there are so many other super fruits to choose from. Grapefruit being the only one that literally can make your medication just... Not work, and/or kill your liver, and/or other things, is a glaring point against it.

Like, it's crazy. If you take thyroid medication, like I used as an example, since it's fairly common? You can literally drink alcohol with no concerns whatsoever, but... Grapefruit/grapefruit juice/etc.? If you have any considerable amount at all, it literally just... Makes your medication not work. It's insane.

chaos_knight posted...

Funny thing is that large spiders are usually less deadly. It's the tiny ones you should worry about

Yes, but tiny spiders typically run from you, while large spiders run at you because what the fuck, life needs nightmare fuel, apparently.

Listen, anything with more than six legs is just unnatural and immediately creepy. Grasshoppers/crickets? You annoying as fuck, but you fine, otherwise. Spiders? Fuck you, stay away. Millipedes/centipedes? Truly, the devil has done work.

_____Cait posted...

Exactly. It didnt fit them. Maybe a plot about Pam getting fired, Jims parents getting sick and needing help, anything other than hey jim and pam suddenly dont communicate properly when they were the best at it happened

This is the takeaway.

Jim/Pam drama, itself, is not a bad idea. But they picked drama that just... Didn't make sense, and that was the problem.

I feel like they could have easily just done without all of that, because the Jim/Daryl stuff alone was enough to sell that storyline. They could have just as easily had Jim/Pam be as happy as Jim/Pam ever were, and it still would have been a fun storyline that set up for good jokes.

Pretty sad that horny posting topics immediately get dealt with, but something like this is left alone, despite it being such a blatant troll topic.

I fucking love you, Guns Akimbo.

Now, to be fair, I do like grapefruit, and especially grapefruit flavoring. Of sodas, I love Squirt, for example. That said, I'm trying to look at this big picture. There's no fruit that has more negative interactions with common medications than grapefruit, so for that reason, I've gotta pick it.

Grapefruit is the clear answer. Grapefruit and Pear are the fruits least used as flavoring for other things, but I've gotta give it to grapefruit as the "go away" fruit, since even if you don't normally like fruit, canned pears in that sugary syrup are really tasty, whereas grapefruit is the single fruit that has the most negative interactions with rather common medications. For example, have thyroid issues? Your thyroid medication will specifically tell you not to eat grapefruit.

Oakland510_ posted...

Damn my bad, the pizza was $22.36, not $24.99. Also the app's coupons didn't show any prices that post #5 and 6 showed. I didn't bother showing the rest of the coupons cause they were for more than 1 pizza but still, none of the coupons on my app had great deals like the deals in post 5 and 6

https://imgur.com/a/288Kh99

https://i.imgur.com/zYYbpBr.jpeg

...So, a large specialty medium is somehow more than a 2 topping large + loaded tots, and the same as a 3 topping large and a 2 topping x-large? That makes no sense whatsoever. Where do you live? I'm also confused how you somehow got a medium one topping pizza to cost more than the medium specialty.

EDIT: Google says the $6.99 and $7.99 deals are nationwide, so I'm not sure how you aren't seeing them.

Oakland510_ posted...

then I go to Domino's app and see a medium, one topping pizza for $24 then I post it here

Prove it. There is no way a ONE topping medium pizza costs $24, even at full menu price.

Post a screenshot.

Brianfellow posted...

https://youtu.be/mRkESFRFE9Q?si=0yZz7qJGvwTiluD7

Good to see him enjoying himself.

Shut the fuck up.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

I've never even seen an extra large pizza for $25 what the fuck toppings are you getting bro

Edit: I realize now that this was the bait, and we all fell for it. I'm usually better at perceiving this type of thing, but I'm tired.

Out of curiosity, I looked into TC's post history, and 95% of it is them posting topics that are basically "Post pictures of Asian girls with big boobs please"

This sure is... Something.

Yeah, I'm very confused.

If a medium pizza was $8 back then, it's actually a dollar cheaper, now, even. Yes, you've gotta use coupons/promo codes/whatever, but said promo codes are... Literally on the website, and they basically throw them in your face when you go to order. Pizza appears to be one of the few things that really hasn't gone up in price much, all things considered.

Oakland510_ posted...

These days I think it's $24.99.

Even at menu price with literally no discounts, it's nowhere near $24.99. Where did you even get this?

Like, I just checked. I went medium pizza, pan crust, five toppings, extra cheese, literally no coupons, and it's still only $22.99. I basically made the pizza as expensive as I reasonably could, and I still didn't hit $24.99.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Right, but in a funny way. Scott's Tots is just supposed to be cringey in general. You're never really meant to laugh. It's two different styles of cringe.

EDIT: Now, to be fair, dinner party does kinda straddle the two. There are moments you're supposed to legitimately just cringe, but it's interspersed with moments where you're supposed to laugh, such as when Michael is showing off his TV. Scott's Tots is pretty much... You're meant to cringe the entire time.

Scott's Tots, definitely. It's the only one that, legitimately, causes you to cringe, by design. The others only cause "cringe" based on how you react to the actual scenario, whereas Scott's Tots is legitimately designed that way, and to a damn good effect.

WingsOfGood posted...

You have them in your house? They will leave little poo pellets. I had one get in somehow and had to get him to come out of hiding. Tried to catch him in a plastic tupperware thing but he got through a tiny hole into my couch pillows. Luckily moving them around he jumped on my pants so I just walked outside and got him off.

Nah, they're too big to get in the house. They like to live around the back wall between properties, since they can climb it and sun themselves. They basically patrol the perimeter, though, since I stopped putting out scorpion traps because baby lizards were getting trapped in them. Only once did a lizard ever actually get in the house, and it was a tiny baby that must have ran in when the door was open. It ran underneath a large box containing a shelf that I tried to move so it could be caught, and... It tried to run to stay under the box, and basically got itself crushed.

I legit felt bad about it for a few minutes.