Lurker > lolife67

"He isn't some killer" when he literally said he wanted to kill people. Him being a chickenshit doesn't change that.

You said he "isn't some killer."

He is, quite literally, a killer. By law, by public opinion, no matter what way you slice it.

Why? What's relevant about the court case, when this topic is almost entirely about his character and what he has done since?

Who is talking about a court case, here? We're talking about him as a person.

There are plenty of people that the law failed to properly condone, such as OJ Simpson.

I feel like this doesn't matter. He went there wanting to kill somebody, he did kill somebody, and now he's literally grifting off of the fact that he killed somebody. Nothing else really matters.

Yep, totally not happy he shot people to death and got away with it.

If I wasn't happy I shot somebody, I wouldn't try to literally market myself based on being "That guy that shot people." But maybe that's just me.

Thinking that you want a reason to kill another human is despicable.

Why did he need to bring a gun? hell why was he there?

It can be self defense and he could have gone there hoping for a situation where he would be able to use his gun. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

So its pretty much what I said?

They actually have. It doesn't matter if you are gay, trans, Black, white, Latino, Russian, or Australian. All humans are capable of the same thing.

In the case of mutants, it's not an apples to apples comparison to real non fictional marginalized people. Black people are not and cannot be born with the innate ability to conjure a hurricane or melt ourselves into a puddle or whatever random lottery magical abilities.

Mutants are capable of any random lottery magical abilities that can range from harmless to apocalyptic scale.
Humans in the real world no matter your creed are not born with innate magical abilities that can range from harmless to apocalyptic.

What's being confused here is thinking the above means someone is saying bigotry is okay.

Isnt she on Rhaenyras side or am I misremembering?

they are literally going to be coming in from a different universe (this/next) year? Perhaps I am wrong, but have they crossed over at all in any of the other MCU movies/shows (except like in the latest Dr. Strange when they literally came from another universe). The MCU as we've seen it in every other movie (in this era) has had no allusions to mutants or any of that politics at all. Which is why it would be kind of weird (unless they are going to wave it off as they are coming in from a different universe)

they have traditionally been different universes. There is a bit of oddness that comes from the MCU trying to merge the two. It actually doesn't align well

But there's an exemption for minors being able to posses long barrel rifles, specifically for hunting. And because of the vague way the law is worded, they were able to get the gun charged dropped, even though he clearly wasn't using it for hunting.

Type of gun? You mean a high-powered semi-automatic rifle? It wasn't a shotgun or single shot hunting rifle he procured. If AR-15's have less regulations than guns actually used for hunting then we are truly screwed.

It shouldn't have been, though. He was underage and so had his girlfriend's brother buy him the gun with money Rittenhouse gave him because he was of age. How is that not the same as having someone of age buy cigarettes or alcohol for a minor? It wasn't even a family member who bought it for him. He was also underaged while open carrying that night in Kenosha, if I'm not mistaken.

Well, I guess it could be 'perceived' as retreating, but he knew what he was doing.

~Maybe having zero street sense should be the crime, if he's that fucking stupid.

As I recall he had already shot someone who threw something in plastic bag at him.
Outside a gas station or something.

I personally don't think it was fair when the judge refused to allow gun charges or his prior and post actions to be addressed during the trial.

Motive wasn't allowed to be established and that alone taints the trial for me. You can disagree, and that's perfectly fine, but I think a trial for murder should absolutely allow evidence of intent.

"I wish I had my gun" shouldn't have been dismissed by the judge. Hanging out with known white supremacists shouldn't have been dismissed. If that was indeed him on video beating the shit out of a teenage girl, that should have been allowed at the trial. Not to mention dismissing his charges of illegally obtaining a gun, crossing state lines, then using it in the act of a crime.

For a first time watcher, anything other than 4-5-6-1-2-3 is a mistake.

If you're rewatching, it doesn't really matter. I personally would do the same as above if I were to rewatch them all in a row but I never do that.

Media literacy is at an all time low because regular literacy is at an all time low.

People who want to kill people don't need an excuse to do so. Case in point: his attackers.

He arrived to the protest and was there for hours without participating in any violence whatsoever and ran from the first sign of it. He had excuses all day and didn't use any of them.

...all the time. >_>

Republicans voted to give our money to foreign people?

So only the Republicans are helping them?

Biden isn't giving aid to us.

Again how did he get support for giving out money to foreign people?

Clearly people in our government allowed this as it's happening.

You are claiming only one side is for it?

Im not insinuating anything, I just read his post in what was probably a vacuum.

I reread his post several times and isnt it? If youre hiring based on sex or race then that means youre hiring based on something other than merit (best person for the job). If you were hiring based on merit then sex or race wouldnt factor into it.

I feel like one or both of us might be misinterpreting something here.

Exactly one character survived being stabbed through the torso, and it wasn't even a chest wound, it was down in the side of her belly.

Wasn't it implied if not outright stated that her training with the other masters was completed at the start of the series, and only air bending was left?

Story could be good but visually the show looks CW/Sci-Fi channel quality and that's incredibly disappointing after Andor.

That's because most people don't consider that particular move a "subspecialty." It's just airbending used lethally.

With metalbending and bloodbending you're finding bits of the element in something else and using it to bend that. The "breathbending" is just air.

Eartbenders had metalbending
Firebenders had lightningbending
Waterbenders had bloodbending

what do Airbenders get as a specialty?

There is no difference to me between a white nationalist and a person who isn't a white nationalist but votes for white nationalists.

The results qualify the actions in this case.

And by "people" we mean those with no grasp in reality that were always going to scream bias anyway.

I might be confusing 616 and ultimate. Was there a Vietnam cap too or am I imagining things?