LogFAQs > #984024411

LightSnake posted...

And there went the goalposts.

You' think if Shang Chi was so relevant, they could get another movie going there, but alas. It wasn't even that bad before it shit the bed in act 3.

Its not bad at all. It's act three is far better than DP3s act 3.

It took 6 years for Dr strange to get a sequel, 5 years for black panther to get one... this is nothing new. But I mean Hollywood has shut down and opened back up repeatedly over the time period. Theres more projects in circulation. Nothing out of the ordinary beyond that.

I'd also bet Mulan is gonna remain more culturally relevant than Shang-Chi honestly. Hell, I'd put money on Avatar.

Mulan is a good one. But Mulan was an adaptation of a legendary fable. Its kinda an unfair comparison.

Congratulations, you've discovered opinion doesn't always need to be qualified.

Also, are these super serious culturally relevant films or kids' films?

Those aren't mutually exclusive, but a film kids can watch dont mean they're kids fidon't?

Opinions don't have to be qualified. But they DO have to be informed.

...and? I mean, setting aside this is not testable, it's the same defense I've seen from the Star Wars sequels. "But kids like..."

Yeah, kids like a lot of flashes in the pan that fade away, and?

Kids also like comic books. Doesnt mean they aren't awesome..

It's amazing how you refuse to allow any criticism and keep trying to pretend most of these are morally complex. The guy who thought Martin Scorcese worked on Joker has opinions!

And Marvel would never allow Logan to be released, be real.

They've already put out projects just aa dark and violent as Logan lmao.

Daredevil? Punsiher?

Or do those not count either?