LogFAQs > #970690162

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So apparently Fire Emblem Engage is good. Like really really good.
legendarylemur 01/07/23 6:19:43 PM #55:	Azardea posted... The fuck are you talking about? Conquest is praised for its maps, some of the best modern FE has to offer, and even Birthright still has better maps than Awakening and Echoes, and I'd argue even Three Houses. You mean aside from the pier chapter, you get like 5-6 chapters of shitty corridors? It's not unanimously agreed lmao. It's a horrendous Lunatic experience, and it was by far the most juggernaut favoring type of map design in the entire series, even more than Awakening which had more open ended maps. Most people who played everything likes map designs in FE4 or 5 or 8. Calling Conquest map design good is some zoomer shit --- "Iwata was awesome" - Mr. Nintendo https://i.imgur.com/krtFHol.jpg <cite>legendarylemur posted [p:970690162] in So apparen... [t:80304164]...</cite> <quote>Azardea posted... </cite><quote>The fuck are you talking about? Conquest is praised for its maps, some of the best modern FE has to offer, and even Birthright still has better maps than Awakening and Echoes, and I'd argue even Three Houses.</quote>You mean aside from the pier chapter, you get like 5-6 chapters of shitty corridors? It's not unanimously agreed lmao. It's a horrendous Lunatic experience, and it was by far the most juggernaut favoring type of map design in the entire series, even more than Awakening which had more open ended maps. Most people who played everything likes map designs in FE4 or 5 or 8. Calling Conquest map design good is some zoomer shit --- "Iwata was awesome" - Mr. Nintendohttps://i.imgur.com/krtFHol.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1