LogFAQs > #975904488

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Sup with women's pants not having adequate pockets, still?
PraetorXyn 09/06/23 7:15:09 PM #6:	Id say a combination of Big Purse and tiny pockets being seen as more fashionable on womens clothing. Tangential subject, but why are womens clothing sizes so stupid? For men, pants are just a waist measurement and a leg measurement, and they come in regular, slim, and relaxed, etc. For womens pants, their size is a magic number that doesnt mean anything, with discriminators like petite etc. stuck after it sometimes. I know so many women who complain about clothes not fitting properly, so what theyre doing obviously isnt working. --- Console war in a nutshell: http://imgur.com/xA6GJZ9.png <cite>PraetorXyn posted [p:975904488] in Sup with w... [t:80558036]...</cite> <quote>Id say a combination of Big Purse and tiny pockets being seen as more fashionable on womens clothing.Tangential subject, but why are womens clothing sizes so stupid? For men, pants are just a waist measurement and a leg measurement, and they come in regular, slim, and relaxed, etc. For womens pants, their size is a magic number that doesnt mean anything, with discriminators like petite etc. stuck after it sometimes. I know so many women who complain about clothes not fitting properly, so what theyre doing obviously isnt working. --- Console war in a nutshell:http://imgur.com/xA6GJZ9.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1