LogFAQs > #975966944

InfinityMonster posted...

It's only a bit over 10% of the amount from Texas. It's irrelevant to the issue NYC is facing and you're wasting your time bringing it up.

According to a approximate number from an unreliable source. You using your own definition to describe it as irreverent is just gibberish and a non answer.

InfinityMonster posted...

You literally said NYC doesn't get the funding Florida and Texas get. A surplus is not funding. That's money for the state. Again, this is a federal issue. Even NY State is not funding much and Hochul told Adams to basically go fuck himself.

Read the entire topic next time. Also, Texas and the entire country is facing a housing shortage, so I'm not sure what nonsense about surpluses you're referring to or why border state would be responsible even if it was a surplus.

Where the fuck do you think a budget comes from? Federal and local funds aka funding. So you don't know what funding is either.

Congress as I said could send nyc more funding. I didn't say congress was sending more to Texas but they do get more federal funding for it this is also a fact. Which you say is irrelevant.

InfinityMonster posted...

I'm sorry, I'm not going to entertain conspiracy theories. Abbott has claimed that amount and the entire city has bought it. Here is the New York Times confirming this.

...... you aren't entertaining conspiracy theories?? yeah okay

Either wayu AbBot is not an accurate source I posted the accurate statement on it.

InfinityMonster posted...

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/us/politics/gop-migrants-blue-cities.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

If you have an actual source confirming the opposite and that every news company and the mayor have been misled, post it. Otherwise it's complete BS.

Your "more credible source" simply doesn't exist.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/two-migrants-describe-arrival-life-nyc-city-shelters-thousands-rcna102845
A large proportion of them have come through the border in Texas, where Gov. Greg Abbott began sending people by bus to New York and other Democratic-run cities last summer.Though some migrants reported having come voluntarily, others said theyve been denied the choice. New York Mayor Eric Adams has criticized Abbotts actions as inhumane, saying they were done without coordination, while Abbott has repeatedly defended his decision.

https://www.caller.com/story/news/texasregion/2022/08/10/nyc-mayor-criticizes-texas-greg-abbott-for-using-migrants-as-political-pawns/65398768007/
Two days after the first group of migrants arrived in New York City from Texas, New York City Mayor Eric Adams criticized Gov. Greg Abbott for using migrants to "manufacture a crisis."

https://www.caller.com/story/news/texasregion/2022/08/10/nyc-mayor-criticizes-texas-greg-abbott-for-using-migrants-as-political-pawns/65398768007/
"Greg Abbott used innocent people as political pawns to manufacture a crisis," one tweet read. "New Yorkers are stepping up to fix it that's our city's values. But we need the federal government's help money, technical assistance and more."

https://www.caller.com/story/news/texasregion/2022/08/10/nyc-mayor-criticizes-texas-greg-abbott-for-using-migrants-as-political-pawns/65398768007/
Adams said it is impossible to ignore the fact that Abbott is now targeting five cities run by Black mayors. Put plainly, Abbott is using this crisis to hurt Black-run cities."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/19/us/new-york-city-migrant-buses-legal-response/index.html
At least nine buses reached the city Sunday, the most recorded in a single day in this recent wave, according to two city officials. At least 1,011 asylum seekers arrived in the city from Friday throughSunday, according to a third city official.
The city may not be aware of additional migrants who have arrived in recent days.

So again many more credible and more in depth sources say differently and confirm these are estimations and the actual numbers are not known. The influx only happened when Abot and DaRacist began sending them. Not before IS what is known. You want to pretend otherwise.

InfinityMonster posted...

"Under the new Biden administration asylum seekers are seeing greater success rates in securing asylum. While asylum denial rates had grown ever higher during the Trump years to a peak of 71 percent in FY 2020, they fell to 63 percent in FY 2021. Expressed another way, success rates grew from 29 percent to 37 percent under President Biden."

Still does not change or refute this:
They denied 34 percent in FY 2017 and 23 percent in FY 2016, but closed the rest of the cases because, among other reasons, the asylum-seeker never showed up or the applicant withdrew the claim. Some of the individuals in the closed cases could have gotten other forms of humanitarian relief or deportation deferrals.

Alex Nowrasteh, a senior immigration policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute, told TheDCNF that there is no data tracking individual asylum-seekers over time as they move through the system and across agencies.

Your link doesn't cover the closed cases. And may have included them in the Denials with out making that distinction.

Giving "perhaps" and "may have" suppositions on them instead:

https://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/667/

It is possible that with so many Immigration Courts closed or partially closed due to the pandemic, that the composition of asylum cases may also have shifted. Perhaps the decline in denials merely reflects the different mix of cases and/or Immigration Judges hearing these casesnot any change in the underlying odds of success more generally for asylum seekers.