LogFAQs > #976405439

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Newsom vetoes bill, SAG strikers won't get unemployment benefits
PiOverlord 10/01/23 1:11:18 AM #14:	It would have been a good thing. Employers can no longer "wait for them to starve out" like the original plan was. It would have given us power. As we are brainwashed to think this is bad, of course we are all glad the forced-upon-us-by-the-fake-game Newsom would veto this. Is there a reason we are already giving up on the idea of a true progressive liberating us as the next candidate after Biden? --- Number of legendary 500 post topics: 35, 500th posts: 34; PiO ATTN: 6 RotM wins 1, LETTEN MY ARROW FLYEN TRUE <cite>PiOverlord posted [p:976405439] in Newsom vet... [t:80582019]...</cite> <quote>It would have been a good thing. Employers can no longer "wait for them to starve out" like the original plan was. It would have given us power. As we are brainwashed to think this is bad, of course we are all glad the forced-upon-us-by-the-fake-game Newsom would veto this. Is there a reason we are already giving up on the idea of a true progressive liberating us as the next candidate after Biden? --- Number of legendary 500 post topics: 35, 500th posts: 34; PiO ATTN: 6RotM wins 1, LETTEN MY ARROW FLYEN TRUE</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1