LogFAQs > #895237117

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I am 100% for gender equality and stuff, but...
R_Jackal 02/01/18 9:12:22 AM #16:	Pastryarchy posted... scar the 1 posted... darkjedilink posted... Okay, how about this - do you believe that it's entirely possible for an entire awards show night to ONLY award women? Possible? I'm not really sure where you're going with this. It's simple. If it's deemed condonable for an annual awards event to just coincidentally have all female winners one year (because their work showed deserving merit), then it should not cause alarm when all the winners happen to be male for the same reason the following year. The people complaining don't want reason or equality, they want superiority by existence. I know few genuine feminists who think anything near what's being complained about. So, any form of common sense, like this, is useless on them. <cite>R_Jackal posted [p:895237117] in I am 100% ... [t:76269052]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pastryarchy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Okay, how about this - do you believe that it's entirely possible for an entire awards show night to ONLY award women?</quote> Possible? I'm not really sure where you're going with this.</quote> It's simple. If it's deemed condonable for an annual awards event to just coincidentally have all female winners one year (because their work showed deserving merit), then it should not cause alarm when all the winners happen to be male for the same reason the following year.</quote> The people complaining don't want reason or equality, they want superiority by existence. I know few genuine feminists who think anything near what's being complained about. So, any form of common sense, like this, is useless on them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1