LogFAQs > #896045376

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicMan cleans graffiti from his building; ordered to pay "artists" $6.7M
Dragonblade01
02/13/18 11:40:47 PM
#215:


sktgamer_13dude posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
A_Good_Boy posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
A_Good_Boy posted...
He could have done that already, all he had to do was a few days. He already managed like 3 decades, dude played himself.

And I think the law should be changed so that the owner of said property doesn't need to adhere to some arbitrary time frame.

That owner probably should have adhered to proper legal channels to challenge the law instead of breaking it. He had plenty of time prior to that 90 day time frame to figure something out, shame he had to resort to the worst option that he could.

Sure, he should have followed the law.

But the law should also be changed.

Why? Artists deserve rights when it comes to their artwork when theyre alive.

Because property owners deserve rights when it comes to the images on their private property.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1