| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | What was supposed to be the moral behind Poe not believing in Holdo? *TLJ spoils |
| ViralMoose 06/05/18 4:35:06 PM #155: | DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Technically yes, Finn was in the wrong, at least by the standards of the First Order. If he was truly loyal to them (the way Poe is loyal to the Resistance), he wouldn't have betrayed them. But he wasn't, he was already having doubts before they went to Jakku. And no, their roles were not equivalent. Finn was a grunt, Poe was a squad commander with subordinates and a higher level of responsibility. Soooo...it's wrong for Poe to betray Holdo, but not for Finn to betray Phasma, because Poe has a higher relative rank than Finn did? So does that mean you think Darth Vader betraying the Emperor at the last moment was the wrong thing to do too? I mean he was second only to the Emperor in the chain of command DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word trust. But Leia made it clear that she picked Holdo to lead. Given the high esteem in which Poe holds Leia, that in itself should have proven to him that Holdo was capable. Leia could have made a mistake. And we already know how Holdo was too dumb to let people know that they weren't actually going on a suicide mission. So obviously she wasn't the best choice for the position. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |