LogFAQs > #902822554

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	If that Kendrick Lamar concert happened in the UK, would the girl be arrested?
PtlessAgmnts 06/09/18 6:49:31 AM #34:	JE19426 posted... PtlessAgmnts posted... Ignorance of the law isn't a valid defense in most cases. Which is irrelevant to the conversation. We aren't talking about an event in which they are ignorant of the law. Like you said, if they went to a nudist beach and recorded a naked child they'd get in trouble for it even if they claimed they didn't know naked children would be there. I didn't say that at all. I said basically the opposite. At least from a legal perspective. I don't think it's just what information they got. Sure, it's also what effort they go to in order to get more information. JE19426 posted... Unless they have reason to believe it's quite likely for a naked child to run in front of the camera, like it's a nudist beach full of children, they wouldn't get in legal trouble You're saying if there's a high likelihood that something not allowed to be broadcasted would occur such as a rap concert with slurs in the lyrics of the to be performed songs and they continue to broadcast it they would get in legal trouble are you not? Exactly, the effort. Both not trying to find out the information and putting in the effort and finding the information but disregarding it would be illegal, don't you agree? Or do you think differently? <cite>PtlessAgmnts posted [p:902822554] in If that Ke... [t:76635518]...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PtlessAgmnts posted...</cite> <quote>Ignorance of the law isn't a valid defense in most cases.</quote> Which is irrelevant to the conversation. We aren't talking about an event in which they are ignorant of the law. <quote>Like you said, if they went to a nudist beach and recorded a naked child they'd get in trouble for it even if they claimed they didn't know naked children would be there.</quote> I didn't say that at all. I said basically the opposite. At least from a legal perspective. <quote>I don't think it's just what information they got.</quote> Sure, it's also what effort they go to in order to get more information.</quote> <cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>Unless they have reason to believe it's quite likely for a naked child to run in front of the camera, like it's a nudist beach full of children, they wouldn't get in legal trouble</quote> You're saying if there's a high likelihood that something not allowed to be broadcasted would occur such as a rap concert with slurs in the lyrics of the to be performed songs and they continue to broadcast it they would get in legal trouble are you not? Exactly, the effort. Both not trying to find out the information and putting in the effort and finding the information but disregarding it would be illegal, don't you agree? Or do you think differently?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1