LogFAQs > #942036926

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Donald Trump could have FUCKED Princess Diana
Grischnak 07/12/20 11:50:14 PM #31:	Damn_Underscore posted... Again, internet standards Internet standards is like saying "Cindy Crawford's mole is gross. Wouldn't bang even in her prime. 3/10.". Princess Diana had no tits and no ass. Sure, if you're into that sort of thing then maybe that's a plus to you, but those are pretty objective facts. Given those facts, I don't know why you find it so hard to believe that some people would not find her attractive. <cite>Grischnak posted [p:942036926] in Donald Tru... [t:78842460]...</cite> <quote>Damn_Underscore posted... </cite> <quote>Again, internet standards</quote> Internet standards is like saying "Cindy Crawford's mole is gross. Wouldn't bang even in her prime. 3/10.". Princess Diana had no tits and no ass. Sure, if you're into that sort of thing then maybe that's a plus to you, but those are pretty objective facts. Given those facts, I don't know why you find it so hard to believe that some people would not find her attractive. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1