Board 8 > sub-ms latency for all

(+) Yeah! (+)

http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits

onlive suggest they've found a way to 'break' effectively shannon limit, a previously thought hard coded limit on radio tranmission, say they've done it 10x and can go up to 100.


well that's

hm

--
"Biting is excellent- it's like kissing only there's a winner."

Wait, this doesn't sound like this has anything to do with latency at all.

clearly you'd be able to directly wirelessly connect to someone a continent away

with uh a x10 increase in radio si

okay look shut up

--
"Biting is excellent- it's like kissing only there's a winner."

that all sounds reasonable to me I suppose

I am tired of nubs confusing latency with bandwidth.

Short of violating the speed of light, it is physically impossible to move a signal from one coast of North America to the other in under 1 ms.

--
assert(!hotterThan(foo, "Hot Nymphomaniacal Lesbian Mind-Controlling Dominatrix Fairy Doctors with glasses"))

latency is what makes my games visual and input lag, it's a sad affair

bandwidth is why it takes my youtube and porn forever to load

I'm all over it

wouldn't it be like

4,180 km/ 3x10^8m = 0.014


so technically if you ignore refractive index, imperfect materials, that latency is usually measured as round trip....


oh right ms you're still right goddamnit

look shut up

--
"Biting is excellent- it's like kissing only there's a winner."