Current Events > Every student from Stoneman Douglas is now required to wear a clear backpack.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
_wwKd_ 03/22/18 12:40:51 PM #1:	Provided by the school at no cost. https://twitter.com/i/moments/976633045498384384 The school will also now have security with metal wand detectors. Isn't this some type of prediction from some works of fiction? Clear backpacks? Really? --- Yeezy Season Fast Approaching. What Would Kobe Do? LoL GT:YeezusWest <cite>_wwKd_ posted [p:898283501] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Provided by the school at no cost. https://twitter.com/i/moments/976633045498384384 The school will also now have security with metal wand detectors. Isn't this some type of prediction from some works of fiction? Clear backpacks? Really?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 03/22/18 12:41:39 PM #2:	A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:898283543] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_wwKd_ 03/22/18 12:42:06 PM #3:	Antifar posted... A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags Really? Wow. --- Yeezy Season Fast Approaching. What Would Kobe Do? LoL GT:YeezusWest <cite>_wwKd_ posted [p:898283567] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags</quote> Really? Wow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 03/22/18 12:42:22 PM #4:	They've been doing this at Chicago public schools for at least a decade. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:898283581] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>They've been doing this at Chicago public schools for at least a decade.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 03/22/18 12:42:38 PM #5:	What if the parents want their kids to have bulletproof backpacks instead? --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:898283599] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>What if the parents want their kids to have bulletproof backpacks instead?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medz1286 03/22/18 12:43:07 PM #6:	Why not ban guns? --- Hi <cite>Medz1286 posted [p:898283628] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Why not ban guns?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 03/22/18 12:43:17 PM #7:	that was already a rule where I went to high school we had to buy our own --- It's one more thing we do to the poor, the deprived: cut out their tongues . . . allow them a language as lousy as their lives <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:898283636] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>that was already a rule where I went to high school we had to buy our own</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bluezero 03/22/18 12:43:36 PM #8:	Foppe posted... What if the parents want their kids to have bulletproof backpacks instead? Clear Kevlar? --- http://i.imgur.com/VleHYd3.png https://badges.steamprofile.com/profile/default/steam/76561197977989731.png <cite>bluezero posted [p:898283656] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>What if the parents want their kids to have bulletproof backpacks instead?</quote> Clear Kevlar?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medz1286 03/22/18 12:44:08 PM #9:	_wwKd_ posted... Antifar posted... A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags Really? Wow. The Vegas shooter was not at the event and still killed --- Hi <cite>Medz1286 posted [p:898283692] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>_wwKd_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags</quote> Really? Wow.</quote> The Vegas shooter was not at the event and still killed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Slimfizzle 03/22/18 12:44:29 PM #10:	What about see through shirts and no bras? --- Mama had a Chicken, Mama had a Cow, Dad was proud, He didn't care how. <cite>Slimfizzle posted [p:898283714] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>What about see through shirts and no bras?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 03/22/18 12:44:34 PM #11:	_wwKd_ posted... Antifar posted... A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags Really? Wow. Not really Makes sense --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:898283720] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>_wwKd_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags</quote> Really? Wow.</quote> Not really Makes sense</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude 03/22/18 12:44:53 PM #12:	Hey, this is what we gotta do so flyover country can maintain their fantasy of taking on the government or some shit. As for the metal detectors, welcome to life as a grade school student of color for the past 30 years. I look forward to all the "this is inhumane" think pieces they will spawn --- alt-right is not synonymous with "white supremacist" or "neo-Nazi,"- The Admiral <cite>FrisbeeDude posted [p:898283736] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Hey, this is what we gotta do so flyover country can maintain their fantasy of taking on the government or some shit. As for the metal detectors, welcome to life as a grade school student of color for the past 30 years. I look forward to all the "this is inhumane" think pieces they will spawn</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 03/22/18 12:44:54 PM #13:	bluezero posted... Foppe posted... What if the parents want their kids to have bulletproof backpacks instead? Clear Kevlar? All they'd have to do is put the Kevlar on the side that would be up against the kids back --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:898283738] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>bluezero posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>What if the parents want their kids to have bulletproof backpacks instead?</quote> Clear Kevlar?</quote> All they'd have to do is put the Kevlar on the side that would be up against the kids back</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 03/22/18 12:45:37 PM #14:	FrisbeeDude posted... Hey, this is what we gotta do so flyover country can maintain their fantasy of taking on the government or some shit. this practice isn't uncommon in flyover country already --- It's one more thing we do to the poor, the deprived: cut out their tongues . . . allow them a language as lousy as their lives <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:898283783] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrisbeeDude posted...</cite> <quote>Hey, this is what we gotta do so flyover country can maintain their fantasy of taking on the government or some shit. </quote> this practice isn't uncommon in flyover country already</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_wwKd_ 03/22/18 12:45:52 PM #15:	For real? I just can't imagine going to a public school with everyone wearing clear backpacks. --- Yeezy Season Fast Approaching. What Would Kobe Do? LoL GT:YeezusWest <cite>_wwKd_ posted [p:898283799] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>For real? I just can't imagine going to a public school with everyone wearing clear backpacks.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 03/22/18 12:46:10 PM #16:	_wwKd_ posted... Antifar posted... A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags Really? Wow. Ever since the marathon bombings Boston doesn't even let people bring bags to a lot of public events. Backpacks are strictly banned on marathon day, obviously --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:898283820] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>_wwKd_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags</quote> Really? Wow.</quote> Ever since the marathon bombings Boston doesn't even let people bring bags to a lot of public events. Backpacks are strictly banned on marathon day, obviously</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 03/22/18 12:55:01 PM #17:	FrisbeeDude posted... Hey, this is what we gotta do so flyover country can maintain their fantasy of taking on the government or some shit. As for the metal detectors, welcome to life as a grade school student of color for the past 30 years. I look forward to all the "this is inhumane" think pieces they will spawn In the schools in Chicagos south side I've seen this implemented it was definitely warranted. These kids had shootouts at the el station, in the parking lots, the street, going to and leaving school. Yet citizens couldn't legally carry a handgun at the time. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:898284311] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrisbeeDude posted...</cite> <quote>Hey, this is what we gotta do so flyover country can maintain their fantasy of taking on the government or some shit. As for the metal detectors, welcome to life as a grade school student of color for the past 30 years. I look forward to all the "this is inhumane" think pieces they will spawn</quote> In the schools in Chicagos south side I've seen this implemented it was definitely warranted. These kids had shootouts at the el station, in the parking lots, the street, going to and leaving school. Yet citizens couldn't legally carry a handgun at the time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 03/22/18 12:57:40 PM #18:	schools have been doing this for awhile now. not for the entire school but if a student at the high schools i went to was caught with something they weren't supposed to have multiple times they were required to wear a clear back pack. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:898284450] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>schools have been doing this for awhile now. not for the entire school but if a student at the high schools i went to was caught with something they weren't supposed to have multiple times they were required to wear a clear back pack.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 03/22/18 12:58:57 PM #19:	Medz1286 posted... Why not ban guns? Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:898284522] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Medz1286 posted...</cite> <quote>Why not ban guns?</quote> Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 03/22/18 1:01:21 PM #20:	Questionmarktarius posted... Medz1286 posted... Why not ban guns? Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html Because citizens wouldn't allow it to happen. Thank God our forefathers had the insight to make it difficult to do something like take away a fundamental American right. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:898284651] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Medz1286 posted...</cite> <quote>Why not ban guns?</quote> Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html</quote> Because citizens wouldn't allow it to happen. Thank God our forefathers had the insight to make it difficult to do something like take away a fundamental American right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 03/22/18 1:04:24 PM #21:	Thatuser posted... Questionmarktarius posted... Medz1286 posted... Why not ban guns? Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html Because citizens wouldn't allow it to happen. Thank God our forefathers had the insight to make it difficult to do something like take away a fundamental American right. It's just sad that you actually believe that's how it really works. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan. It's definitely going to be an interesting day when that happens. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:898284824] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Medz1286 posted...</cite> <quote>Why not ban guns?</quote> Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html</quote> Because citizens wouldn't allow it to happen. Thank God our forefathers had the insight to make it difficult to do something like take away a fundamental American right.</quote> It's just sad that you actually believe that's how it really works. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan. It's definitely going to be an interesting day when that happens.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
C_Pain 03/22/18 1:05:44 PM #22:	imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it --- How quaint. Join the Dank Chamber today: https://discord.gg/YwmDmtZ <cite>C_Pain posted [p:898284911] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonStar 03/22/18 1:05:48 PM #23:	Sacrificing privacy for 'security' <cite>CommonStar posted [p:898284919] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Sacrificing privacy for 'security'</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 03/22/18 1:09:23 PM #24:	Questionmarktarius posted... Thatuser posted... Questionmarktarius posted... Medz1286 posted... Why not ban guns? Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html Because citizens wouldn't allow it to happen. Thank God our forefathers had the insight to make it difficult to do something like take away a fundamental American right. It's sad that you actually believe that. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan. I'm saying citizens wouldn't let this happen. You can say its illegal, even decree it. People won't voluntarily turn them in on the scale you think. It would cause civil war. Maybe not in the state vs state sense like the 1860s, but people would die attempting to enforce this. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:898285124] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Medz1286 posted...</cite> <quote>Why not ban guns?</quote> Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html</quote> Because citizens wouldn't allow it to happen. Thank God our forefathers had the insight to make it difficult to do something like take away a fundamental American right.</quote> It's sad that you actually believe that. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan.</quote> I'm saying citizens wouldn't let this happen. You can say its illegal, even decree it. People won't voluntarily turn them in on the scale you think. It would cause civil war. Maybe not in the state vs state sense like the 1860s, but people would die attempting to enforce this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 03/22/18 1:10:06 PM #25:	Remember how the 2nd amendment uses special grammar that nothing else from that period of time uses? --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:898285168] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Remember how the 2nd amendment uses special grammar that nothing else from that period of time uses?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 03/22/18 1:13:04 PM #26:	Foppe posted... Remember how the 2nd amendment uses special grammar that nothing else from that period of time uses? Because it had detractors even then. That's the only reason it bothers with a "why" part. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:898285370] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>Remember how the 2nd amendment uses special grammar that nothing else from that period of time uses?</quote> Because it had detractors even then. That's the only reason it bothers with a "why" part.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medz1286 03/22/18 1:14:27 PM #27:	C_Pain posted... imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it --- Hi <cite>Medz1286 posted [p:898285450] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>C_Pain posted...</cite> <quote>imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kitt 03/22/18 1:32:50 PM #28:	I remember at my job it was suspected that people were stealing, so for a while they made us only use clear bags. --- http://i.imgur.com/pmc9XsI.gif http://i.imgur.com/LkrRVe2.gifv http://i.imgur.com/Dp03g3y.jpg Cute? B**, I'm adorable. <cite>Kitt posted [p:898286565] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>I remember at my job it was suspected that people were stealing, so for a while they made us only use clear bags.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
r4X0r 03/22/18 1:33:58 PM #29:	Medz1286 posted... Why not ban guns? They already were. --- I faced it all and I stood tall- And did it my way. <cite>r4X0r posted [p:898286636] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Medz1286 posted...</cite> <quote>Why not ban guns?</quote> They already were.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 03/22/18 1:37:20 PM #30:	These are some good steps! --- Oda break tracker 2018- 2 (1) \| THE Ohio State: 11-2 \| Oakland Raiders: 6-10 Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:898286837] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>These are some good steps!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 03/22/18 1:39:49 PM #31:	Soon: https://www.handgunhideouts.com/s/cc_images/cache_4092391276.jpg <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:898286982] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Soon: https://www.handgunhideouts.com/s/cc_images/cache_4092391276.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deupd_u 03/22/18 1:43:11 PM #32:	A moment of silence for liberty https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Moment_of_silence.jpg/1200px-Moment_of_silence.jpg --- Snipers don't shoot at paper, they shoot watermelons. http://i.imgur.com/jo511lG.jpg <cite>deupd_u posted [p:898287177] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>A moment of silence for liberty https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Moment_of_silence.jpg/1200px-Moment_of_silence.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 03/22/18 1:43:54 PM #33:	I thought they tore the school down --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:898287209] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>I thought they tore the school down</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 03/22/18 1:45:23 PM #34:	_wwKd_ posted... Antifar posted... A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags Really? Wow. A lot of schools started requiring clear backpacks after Columbine. Thatuser posted... Questionmarktarius posted... It's sad that you actually believe that. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan. I'm saying citizens wouldn't let this happen. You can say its illegal, even decree it. People won't voluntarily turn them in on the scale you think. It would cause civil war. Maybe not in the state vs state sense like the 1860s, but people would die attempting to enforce this. As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional. --- "Shut your filthy whore mouth."- AB "But if I shut my filthy whore mouth, I can't use it to be a filthy whore. Does not compute." - TashaMK <cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted [p:898287279] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>_wwKd_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags</quote> Really? Wow.</quote>A lot of schools started requiring clear backpacks after Columbine. <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote>Questionmarktarius posted... It's sad that you actually believe that. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan.</quote> I'm saying citizens wouldn't let this happen. You can say its illegal, even decree it. People won't voluntarily turn them in on the scale you think. It would cause civil war. Maybe not in the state vs state sense like the 1860s, but people would die attempting to enforce this.</quote>As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 03/22/18 1:52:30 PM #35:	DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional. It'll be about a dozen Waco sieges in short succession, then all hell will break loose. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:898287697] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote>As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional.</quote> It'll be about a dozen Waco sieges in short succession, then all hell will break loose.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 03/22/18 1:52:32 PM #36:	DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... _wwKd_ posted... Antifar posted... A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags Really? Wow. A lot of schools started requiring clear backpacks after Columbine. Thatuser posted... Questionmarktarius posted... It's sad that you actually believe that. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan. I'm saying citizens wouldn't let this happen. You can say its illegal, even decree it. People won't voluntarily turn them in on the scale you think. It would cause civil war. Maybe not in the state vs state sense like the 1860s, but people would die attempting to enforce this. As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional. American soldiers are people too. There are sane politicians out there. You're asking American soldiers to go door to door, forcing people at gunpoint to disarm. Soldiers will die. Citizens will die. Guns will STILL be available. Your solution is worse then the current problem. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:898287699] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_wwKd_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of sporting events now require women to have clear bags</quote> Really? Wow.</quote>A lot of schools started requiring clear backpacks after Columbine. <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote>Questionmarktarius posted... It's sad that you actually believe that. All it really takes, is the right five lawyers decreeing that the 2nd amendment doesn't actually meant what we've thought it's meant since 1789. That's the actual plan.</quote> I'm saying citizens wouldn't let this happen. You can say its illegal, even decree it. People won't voluntarily turn them in on the scale you think. It would cause civil war. Maybe not in the state vs state sense like the 1860s, but people would die attempting to enforce this.</quote>As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional.</quote> American soldiers are people too. There are sane politicians out there. You're asking American soldiers to go door to door, forcing people at gunpoint to disarm. Soldiers will die. Citizens will die. Guns will STILL be available. Your solution is worse then the current problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 03/22/18 2:00:10 PM #37:	DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional. Worked for the Vietnamese. Plus many of the armed forces will deflect. --- Oda break tracker 2018- 2 (1) \| THE Ohio State: 11-2 \| Oakland Raiders: 6-10 Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:898288160] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote>As I've said before, anyone who believes the citizenry of this country stands a chance in hell against the US armed forces is delusional.</quote> Worked for the Vietnamese. Plus many of the armed forces will deflect.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 03/22/18 2:02:40 PM #38:	Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds isn't going to mean shit against highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war. --- "Shut your filthy whore mouth."- AB "But if I shut my filthy whore mouth, I can't use it to be a filthy whore. Does not compute." - TashaMK <cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted [p:898288304] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds isn't going to mean shit against highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlueJester007 03/22/18 2:03:17 PM #39:	Slimfizzle posted... What about see through shirts and no bras? Now youve made it weird. These are kids, man. --- Donald Trump is under your bed. <cite>BlueJester007 posted [p:898288340] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Slimfizzle posted...</cite> <quote>What about see through shirts and no bras?</quote> Now youve made it weird. These are kids, man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuia 03/22/18 2:06:03 PM #40:	Next everyone will have to go to school naked because a kid hid a gun in his underwear --- "You will pay dearly for your futile resistance!" <cite>SageHarpuia posted [p:898288502] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Next everyone will have to go to school naked because a kid hid a gun in his underwear</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr_Biscuit 03/22/18 2:07:06 PM #41:	C_Pain posted... imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it everything should be legal because bad people will do it anyway --- https://www.bigplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/img_6703.jpg <cite>Mr_Biscuit posted [p:898288563] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>C_Pain posted...</cite> <quote>imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it</quote> everything should be legal because bad people will do it anyway</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Slimfizzle 03/22/18 2:07:19 PM #42:	BlueJester007 posted... Slimfizzle posted... What about see through shirts and no bras? Now youve made it weird. These are kids, man. That one girl hid a knife in her bra. Just sayian --- Mama had a Chicken, Mama had a Cow, Dad was proud, He didn't care how. <cite>Slimfizzle posted [p:898288579] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlueJester007 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Slimfizzle posted...</cite> <quote>What about see through shirts and no bras?</quote> Now youve made it weird. These are kids, man.</quote> That one girl hid a knife in her bra. Just sayian</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG 03/22/18 2:08:35 PM #43:	Did the shooter bring his gun in a backpack? --- Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids. <cite>lilORANG posted [p:898288660] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote>Did the shooter bring his gun in a backpack?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 03/22/18 2:08:51 PM #44:	DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war. You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you? <cite>Thatuser posted [p:898288676] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war.</quote> You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
r4X0r 03/22/18 2:10:02 PM #45:	Mr_Biscuit posted... C_Pain posted... imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it everything should be legal because bad people will do it anyway Everything should be illegal because that will stop people from doing it. See how that kind of silliness cuts both ways? --- I faced it all and I stood tall- And did it my way. <cite>r4X0r posted [p:898288744] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mr_Biscuit posted...</cite> <quote><cite>C_Pain posted...</cite> <quote>imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it</quote> everything should be legal because bad people will do it anyway</quote> Everything should be illegal because that will stop people from doing it. See how that kind of silliness cuts both ways?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 03/22/18 2:12:54 PM #46:	Thatuser posted... DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war. You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you? I am not "calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law". I'm saying that if it came down to Joe Average vs. an ill-adjusted 4-tour Marine, it will NOT go well, for anyone. Just by dint of materiel, personnel, and experience, the military would have the upper hand in an all-out conflict. --- "Shut your filthy whore mouth."- AB "But if I shut my filthy whore mouth, I can't use it to be a filthy whore. Does not compute." - TashaMK <cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted [p:898288907] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war.</quote> You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you?</quote> I am not "calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law". I'm saying that if it came down to Joe Average vs. an ill-adjusted 4-tour Marine, it will NOT go well, for anyone. Just by dint of materiel, personnel, and experience, the military would have the upper hand in an all-out conflict.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 03/22/18 2:18:44 PM #47:	DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Thatuser posted... DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war. You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you? I am not "calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law". I'm saying that if it came down to Joe Average vs. an ill-adjusted 4-tour Marine, it will NOT go well, for anyone. Just by dint of materiel, personnel, and experience, the military would have the upper hand in an all-out conflict. I agree with you. People will die. People that are currently law abiding will be made into criminals.And guns will still be available on the black market. You seem to support a tyrannical government as the lesser of two evils. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:898289253] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war.</quote> You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you?</quote> I am not "calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law". I'm saying that if it came down to Joe Average vs. an ill-adjusted 4-tour Marine, it will NOT go well, for anyone. Just by dint of materiel, personnel, and experience, the military would have the upper hand in an all-out conflict.</quote> I agree with you. People will die. People that are currently law abiding will be made into criminals.And guns will still be available on the black market. You seem to support a tyrannical government as the lesser of two evils.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DirkDiggles 03/22/18 2:19:20 PM #48:	Questionmarktarius posted... Medz1286 posted... Why not ban guns? Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html Ok, you abolish the 2nd amendment. Yay, law abiding citizens can no longer own guns and turn them in to the authorities. Oh shoot. I forgot all about those black market guns and those pesky criminals who use them...... You got a solution for that? --- https://i.imgur.com/akpEP6p.gif https://i.imgur.com/hVRNKNs.gif <cite>DirkDiggles posted [p:898289295] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Medz1286 posted...</cite> <quote>Why not ban guns?</quote> Nobody wants to make any actual effort to do so. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html</quote> Ok, you abolish the 2nd amendment. Yay, law abiding citizens can no longer own guns and turn them in to the authorities. Oh shoot. I forgot all about those black market guns and those pesky criminals who use them...... You got a solution for that?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 03/22/18 2:21:09 PM #49:	Thatuser posted... DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Thatuser posted... DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted... Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war. You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you? I am not "calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law". I'm saying that if it came down to Joe Average vs. an ill-adjusted 4-tour Marine, it will NOT go well, for anyone. Just by dint of materiel, personnel, and experience, the military would have the upper hand in an all-out conflict. I agree with you. People will die. People that are currently law abiding will be made into criminals.And guns will still be available on the black market. You seem to support a tyrannical government as the lesser of two evils. Will you please stop putting words in my mouth? I am NOT saying I support a tyrannical government, either. I'm saying that if something like this did happen, it would be BAD. If it gets to that point, two things have happened: 1, this country is either teetering on the verge of or has become a dictatorship; and 2, people are so ground down that they accept large numbers of casualties as needed "for the greater good." --- "Shut your filthy whore mouth."- AB "But if I shut my filthy whore mouth, I can't use it to be a filthy whore. Does not compute." - TashaMK <cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted [p:898289394] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, soldiers are people, but they are also conditioned killers. There are some in uniform who wouldn't think twice about killing anyone they were ordered to, fellow citizen or not. And if you can find a couple dozen drone operators that are willing, that makes it simpler. And "sane politicians"? WTF are politicians in this country ever going to do except issue strongly worded statements and line their pockets with lobbyist money? I'm not saying "military vs. citizens" is a solution (You really thought I implied that?), I'm just saying that if it came to that point, Ricky Redneck with his semi-auto AR and 5000 rounds is not an even match to highly trained fighters with fully automatic rifles, explosives, and various other weapons of war.</quote> You're calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law. That is a much serious problem then any we currently face. Do you realize what you're saying? And if that isnt your solution. What do you envision? People saying "here you go, take my guns" and peacefully going along with it? That won't happen. The army will be forced to kill people, or imprison them; Americans on American soil. What does that sound like to you?</quote> I am not "calling for the military to kill American civilians in order to enforce a law". I'm saying that if it came down to Joe Average vs. an ill-adjusted 4-tour Marine, it will NOT go well, for anyone. Just by dint of materiel, personnel, and experience, the military would have the upper hand in an all-out conflict.</quote> I agree with you. People will die. People that are currently law abiding will be made into criminals.And guns will still be available on the black market. You seem to support a tyrannical government as the lesser of two evils.</quote> Will you please stop putting words in my mouth? I am NOT saying I support a tyrannical government, either. I'm saying that if something like this did happen, it would be BAD. If it gets to that point, two things have happened: 1, this country is either teetering on the verge of or has become a dictatorship; and 2, people are so ground down that they accept large numbers of casualties as needed "for the greater good."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr_Biscuit 03/22/18 3:05:36 PM #50:	r4X0r posted... Mr_Biscuit posted... C_Pain posted... imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it everything should be legal because bad people will do it anyway Everything should be illegal because that will stop people from doing it. See how that kind of silliness cuts both ways? ...no, no I dont. Most things that are deemed unethical and dangerous ARE illegal, and those laws largely work as deterrents and preventatives. So... what was your point? --- https://www.bigplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/img_6703.jpg <cite>Mr_Biscuit posted [p:898291911] in Every stud... [t:76441473]...</cite> <quote><cite>r4X0r posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mr_Biscuit posted...</cite> <quote><cite>C_Pain posted...</cite> <quote>imagine thinking banning something means bad people cant get it</quote> everything should be legal because bad people will do it anyway</quote> Everything should be illegal because that will stop people from doing it. See how that kind of silliness cuts both ways?</quote> ...no, no I dont. Most things that are deemed unethical and dangerous ARE illegal, and those laws largely work as deterrents and preventatives. So... what was your point?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Every student from Stoneman Douglas is now required to wear a clear backpack. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Every student from Stoneman Douglas is now required to wear a clear backpack.