Poll of the Day > Fire Emblem or Pokemon??

Topic List	Page List: 1
Raw_Egg 05/20/18 7:49:32 PM #1:	Start a new game for Fire Emblem Awakening or Pokemon X? - Results (6 votes) Fire Emblem Awakening 66.67% (4 votes) 4 Pokemon X 33.33% (2 votes) 2 Is fire emblem a shorter game? <cite>Raw_Egg posted [p:901698189] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote> Start a new game for Fire Emblem Awakening or Pokemon X? - Results (6 votes) Fire Emblem Awakening 66.67% (4 votes) 4 Pokemon X 33.33% (2 votes) 2 Is fire emblem a shorter game?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Makavhelly 05/20/18 7:51:29 PM #2:	FE is shorter --- "I been hesitant to reappear, been away for years Now I'm back, my adversaries been reduced to tears" <cite>Makavhelly posted [p:901698283] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote>FE is shorter</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanglyKhan 05/20/18 8:00:22 PM #3:	Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO. I voted Awakening due to the fact that I just like FE over Pokemon, at least as a solo experience. Nothing beats Pokemon with friends though. <cite>GanglyKhan posted [p:901698697] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote>Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO. I voted Awakening due to the fact that I just like FE over Pokemon, at least as a solo experience. Nothing beats Pokemon with friends though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 05/20/18 9:12:51 PM #4:	x would be shorter if you could skip cutscenes --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:901702235] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote>x would be shorter if you could skip cutscenes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EclairReturns 05/20/18 9:19:55 PM #5:	I like the first choice more because I personally think that it requires you to mentally engage yourself in the game-play moreso than Pocket Monsters. Otherwise, I get bored very easily just issuing commands and watching animations. But I personally hate turn-based RPGs, so take this with a grain of salt, if you will. --- Number XII: Larxene. The Organization's Savage Nymph. <cite>EclairReturns posted [p:901702564] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote>I like the first choice more because I personally think that it requires you to mentally engage yourself in the game-play moreso than Pocket Monsters. Otherwise, I get bored very easily just issuing commands and watching animations. But I personally hate turn-based RPGs, so take this with a grain of salt, if you will.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 05/20/18 9:37:01 PM #6:	GanglyKhan posted... Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO. Someone hasn't played Fire Emblem Fates... Or Shadow Dragon, depending on how loose we're being with the term "recent history". --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:901703466] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote>Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO.</quote> Someone hasn't played Fire Emblem Fates... Or Shadow Dragon, depending on how loose we're being with the term "recent history".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanglyKhan 05/20/18 9:41:26 PM #7:	darkknight109 posted... GanglyKhan posted... Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO. Someone hasn't played Fire Emblem Fates... Or Shadow Dragon, depending on how loose we're being with the term "recent history". I really enjoyed Fates and found SoV to be intriguing since they did not go ahead with the modern systems for combat, which was a nice change of pace. Awakening's maps really killed the game for me. The second and third "arcs" of the game pick up in quality, but it doesn't make those first 13 chapters any more enjoyable. And I am not counting SD, just the 3DS games for both series. <cite>GanglyKhan posted [p:901703707] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote>Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO.</quote> Someone hasn't played Fire Emblem Fates... Or Shadow Dragon, depending on how loose we're being with the term "recent history".</quote> I really enjoyed Fates and found SoV to be intriguing since they did not go ahead with the modern systems for combat, which was a nice change of pace. Awakening's maps really killed the game for me. The second and third "arcs" of the game pick up in quality, but it doesn't make those first 13 chapters any more enjoyable. And I am not counting SD, just the 3DS games for both series.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Garlands_Soul 05/20/18 10:19:52 PM #8:	Tough call. I'm not fond of either of these games, but I'll go for FE. --- "I, Garland, will knock you all down!" <cite>Garlands_Soul posted [p:901705658] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote>Tough call. I'm not fond of either of these games, but I'll go for FE.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 05/20/18 11:58:40 PM #9:	GanglyKhan posted... darkknight109 posted... GanglyKhan posted... Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO. Someone hasn't played Fire Emblem Fates... Or Shadow Dragon, depending on how loose we're being with the term "recent history". I really enjoyed Fates and found SoV to be intriguing since they did not go ahead with the modern systems for combat, which was a nice change of pace. Awakening's maps really killed the game for me. The second and third "arcs" of the game pick up in quality, but it doesn't make those first 13 chapters any more enjoyable. And I am not counting SD, just the 3DS games for both series. I don't know how you could like Birthright or Revelation over Awakening, since both of them basically are Awakening, but with shittier characters, a terrible story, and even less of a pretense of difficulty than Awakening had. Conquest I could see, given that Conquest had far more interesting maps than Awakening did and is probably the most challenging English FE game since FE7, but even then you have to overlook an absolutely putrescent story. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:901709854] in Fire Emble... [t:76627850]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote>Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO.</quote> Someone hasn't played Fire Emblem Fates... Or Shadow Dragon, depending on how loose we're being with the term "recent history".</quote> I really enjoyed Fates and found SoV to be intriguing since they did not go ahead with the modern systems for combat, which was a nice change of pace. Awakening's maps really killed the game for me. The second and third "arcs" of the game pick up in quality, but it doesn't make those first 13 chapters any more enjoyable. And I am not counting SD, just the 3DS games for both series.</quote> I don't know how you could like Birthright or Revelation over Awakening, since both of them basically are Awakening, but with shittier characters, a terrible story, and even less of a pretense of difficulty than Awakening had. Conquest I could see, given that Conquest had far more interesting maps than Awakening did and is probably the most challenging English FE game since FE7, but even then you have to overlook an absolutely putrescent story.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Fire Emblem or Pokemon?? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Fire Emblem or Pokemon??