Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 200: Sayonara Nimrata

(+) Yeah! (+)

UltimaterializerX posted...

From the same people who defend Antifa when they do the EXACT same things.

BANG!

Bait
---

This should surprise you (hahaha, no), but the Left fucked with the Proud Boys, hitting a guy in the head and knocking his head off.... whoops.

Now the Proud Boys obviously went way too far with this, but it does speak to the fucking stupidity of the Libs. Dont fuck with a group of people 1,000 times tougher than you and your Starbucks soy no foam friends, especially when that group is also bigger than you,

LetsGoSquirtle7 posted...

This should surprise you (hahaha, no), but the Left fucked with the Proud Boys, hitting a guy in the head and knocking his head off.... whoops.

Now the Proud Boys obviously went way too far with this, but it does speak to the fucking stupidity of the Libs. Dont fuck with a group of people 1,000 times tougher than you and your Starbucks soy no foam friends, especially when that group is also bigger than you,

No. Everyone fighting in the streets should be arrested regardless of affiliation. That shit shouldn't be tolerated.
---

Citation needed to that first statement.

Seems to me that, like always, right-wing shitheads are doing vile shit and then trying to worm their way out of taking responsibility.
---

Corrik posted...

LetsGoSquirtle7 posted...

This should surprise you (hahaha, no), but the Left fucked with the Proud Boys, hitting a guy in the head and knocking his head off.... whoops.

Now the Proud Boys obviously went way too far with this, but it does speak to the fucking stupidity of the Libs. Dont fuck with a group of people 1,000 times tougher than you and your Starbucks soy no foam friends, especially when that group is also bigger than you,

No. Everyone fighting in the streets should be arrested regardless of affiliation. That shit shouldn't be tolerated.

Where did I say they shouldnt?

Yes, obviously they absolutely should be arrested (both sides) my point was (pretty much like always) it was started by the peaceful Libs.

Like every other time, this shit doesnt happen without them.

Inviso posted...

Citation needed to that first statement.

Seems to me that, like always, right-wing shitheads are doing vile shit and then trying to worm their way out of taking responsibility.

God damn Huff Post reported it....

Being that they are complete and utter liars for the Libs, get real here.

So just to be clear.

A group of violent racists respond to having a hat knocked off one of their heads by beating the shit out of an entire group of people. And yet antifa and LIBERALS are the bad guys not just in THIS incident, but in society as a whole. Like...what EXACTLY do conservatives stand for beyond violence against outsiders? Because just based on interactions with you, MWC, I haven't seen much to the ideology beyond just violent hatred. What exactly makes your ideology different from that of radical Islamic terrorists at this point?
---

inviso

can you maybe don't
---

Inviso posted...

So just to be clear.

A group of violent racists respond to having a hat knocked off one of their heads by beating the shit out of an entire group of people. And yet antifa and LIBERALS are the bad guys not just in THIS incident, but in society as a whole. Like...what EXACTLY do conservatives stand for beyond violence against outsiders? Because just based on interactions with you, MWC, I haven't seen much to the ideology beyond just violent hatred. What exactly makes your ideology different from that of radical Islamic terrorists at this point?

I wouldnt personally have beaten them up. I didnt say it was right. I said it was the Libs fault however. This LITERALLY doesnt fucking happen. (Like god damn always) if the fucking Libs dont commit battery on the other group first. No, its not an excuse for their reaction, but it however is a fact it never even escalates to that point if the Libs dont start shit.

And thats every situation. Can you name me one where something escalated because Conservatives got up in faces screaming or committing felonies cause they didnt like someones hat or shirt.

Tell me next time you see a fucking video of a group of Conservatives drag someone out of a car and beat them to near death cause she wore an Im with her shirt.

I cannot block him, unfortunately. And since I'm forced to see blatantly fucked up posts defending Nazism, I'm incapable of just allowing it to go by unchallenged.
---

Inviso posted...

I cannot block him, unfortunately. And since I'm forced to see blatantly fucked up posts defending Nazism, I'm incapable of just allowing it to go by unchallenged.

See... thats the problem (among many) with Libs....

Im not defending Nazis here. What they did was also obviously vile....

IT DOESNT GET THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE WITHOUT AN ESCALATING CATALYST, and that is always, Always, ALWAYS!!!, the Libs. End of on that one. The right simply doesnt do that.

Except nobody takes him seriously and the only reason anybody pays attention to him is you. If you didn't respond his notable utility would be at zero. By you engaging him you come off worse than he is. I'm about 2 posts away from blocking you myself.
---

LapisLazuli posted...

Except nobody takes him seriously and the only reason anybody pays attention to him is you. If you didn't respond his notable utility would be at zero. By you engaging him you come off worse than he is. I'm about 2 posts away from blocking you myself.

Now if this isnt the Liberal hive mind perfectly summed up.

people could at least have dedicated alts for responding to trash so we can just ignore those alts at least
---

There should be a political faction MMA league where people who want to fight Proud Boys and people who want to fight Antifa can sign up for consensual brawls

Heck I might even join!
---

Jakyl25 posted...

There should be a political faction MMA league where people who want to fight Proud Boys and people who want to fight Antifa can sign up for consensual brawls

Heck I might even join!

Im
Actually fine with this.

Its capitalism at its best, and there is a NATURAL hate already, you dont need storyline for this.

https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1050935267761278976?s=21

Eyyyy some justice
---

Jakyl25 posted...

https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1050935267761278976?s=21

Eyyyy some justice

Is

Is Attempted Murder not a crime in Michigan?

His defense was that he fired his gun accidentally
---

Jakyl25 posted...

His defense was that he fired his gun accidentally

Is attempted Negligent homicide a thing?

it's completely insane that accidentally firing a gun can actually be a defense of anything and not just its own crime when directed to another human being

it's a fucking gun not a toy
---

How could you possibly claim that was accidental? He clearly takes aim, lines up the shot, and then fires?
---

What moron would look at that video and think it was an accident?
---

CoolCly posted...

How could you possibly claim that was accidental? He clearly takes aim, lines up the shot, and then fires?

And after he's clearly not fazed. There's no "OH SHIT".

Likes, if this were Law & Order that would be the smoking gun video that's been missing all episode that they find in the last 5 minutes.
---

GuessMyUserName posted...

it's completely insane that accidentally firing a gun can actually be a defense of anything and not just its own crime when directed to another human being

it's a fucking gun not a toy

The entire justice system is pretty fucked up.

Gay/trans panic is still allowable on most states
---

LapisLazuli posted...

CoolCly posted...

How could you possibly claim that was accidental? He clearly takes aim, lines up the shot, and then fires?

And after he's clearly not faced. There's no "OH SHIT".

Yeah, he's looking exactly where he just fired to see if he hit the target.
---

https://heavy.com/news/2018/10/cornerstore-caroline-teresa-sue-klein-video/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

bUt AlL wOmEn ShLd Be BeLiEvEd

@UltimaterializerX @ExThaNemesis
---

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.

Literal voting tax.
---

HarrietTubgirl posted...

https://heavy.com/news/2018/10/cornerstore-caroline-teresa-sue-klein-video/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

bUt AlL wOmEn ShLd Be BeLiEvEd

@UltimaterializerX @ExThaNemesis

Were talking about a black child with his mother as the accused here.

Cute as fuck the way you tag in ExTha lmfao
---

UltimaterializerX posted...

Is that the girl who accused a 9 year old black kid of sexual assault?

Yep

Leftists trying real hard to spin it as "apples to oranges," but this lady had about as much evidence in her accusation as Christine Blasey Ford (ie, none).
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.

Yeah I've been mad about this for a while

Voting suppression is one of the things that makes me the most angry, this is obviously unconstitutional and it proves to me that Kavanaugh is a partisan fraud

How about you guys read the majority opinion and educate yourselves? I would imagine there is rationale for the ruling beyond "let's ensure minorities can't vote."
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-dakota-voter-id-law-upheld-by-supreme-court-could-affect-senate-race/

1) Kavanaugh didnt vote because he wasnt present during arguments
2) Breyer and Sotomayor voted with the 6-2 majority

Unless youre talking about a second ND voter ID case Im not aware about in which case sorry for my snark!
---

UltimaterializerX posted...

HarrietTubgirl posted...

UltimaterializerX posted...

Is that the girl who accused a 9 year old black kid of sexual assault?

Yep

Leftists trying real hard to spin it as "apples to oranges," but this lady had about as much evidence in her accusation as Christine Blasey Ford (ie, none).

I don't think that's the takeaway here. White leftist women, the virtue signalers of racism, have been caught on camera pretty much daily calling 911 on black people for ZERO reason.

what makes you think those women are leftist
---

So how do you guys think the House of Saud is going to take out MBS? Will they do it themselves, farm it out to another group like Mossad, or remove key members of his security detail after a credible threat from a fundamentalist group arises? Decisions, decisions.
---

Didnt Mossad already try once earlier this year?
---

https://twitter.com/metaltango/status/1050848808110673920?s=21

L&O SVU tackled the biggest threat of our time, incels
---

Suprak the Stud posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-dakota-voter-id-law-upheld-by-supreme-court-could-affect-senate-race/

1) Kavanaugh didnt vote because he wasnt present during arguments
2) Breyer and Sotomayor voted with the 6-2 majority

Unless youre talking about a second ND voter ID case Im not aware about in which case sorry for my snark!

Come on now, Suprak. Kavanaugh casted the deciding vote and paratroopa has been mad about this for awhile now. Stop lying
---

Suprak the Stud posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-dakota-voter-id-law-upheld-by-supreme-court-could-affect-senate-race/

1) Kavanaugh didnt vote because he wasnt present during arguments
2) Breyer and Sotomayor voted with the 6-2 majority

Unless youre talking about a second ND voter ID case Im not aware about in which case sorry for my snark!

had seen somewhere that this was a 5-4 decision but I'm willing to retract

I've actually had a long conversation with someone about this and I think my arguments against the ND law are too weak from a textual perspective to ding Kavanaugh for, but I'm tired and this topic is not worthy of me repeating them

long story short is that the ruling is probably unfortunately correct even if I think the law is vastly insufficient to protect people, that's how the law is

Suprak the Stud posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-dakota-voter-id-law-upheld-by-supreme-court-could-affect-senate-race/

1) Kavanaugh didnt vote because he wasnt present during arguments
2) Breyer and Sotomayor voted with the 6-2 majority

Unless youre talking about a second ND voter ID case Im not aware about in which case sorry for my snark!

Lmfao CAUGHT
---

Paratroopa1 posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

Something I don't think was discussed here - in a 5-4 decision (Kavanaugh voted in the majority) this week the Supreme Court upheld a North Dakota law requiring voters to have a physical mailing address, not just a P.O. box. Why is this important? Because in North Dakota there are thousands of Native Americans living on reservations who do not have addresses, only P.O. boxes. Before now that was never an issue, but now they can't vote, and with less than a month before the midterms there is precious little time to do anything about it.

Just in case you thought GOP voter suppression was no longer a thing.

Yeah I've been mad about this for a while

Voting suppression is one of the things that makes me the most angry, this is obviously unconstitutional and it proves to me that Kavanaugh is a partisan fraud

Paratroopa1 posted...

had seen somewhere that this was a 5-4 decision but I'm willing to retract

I've actually had a long conversation with someone about this and I think my arguments against the ND law are too weak from a textual perspective to ding Kavanaugh for, but I'm tired and this topic is not worthy of me repeating them

long story short is that the ruling is probably unfortunately correct even if I think the law is vastly insufficient to protect people, that's how the law is

I am at just a loss how someone went from being so mad about this to realizing it is probably right once they see some liberal judges voted for it.

Totally at a loss.

/sarcasm
---

Did you miss the part where he had a long conversation between those posts and he realizes he was wrong?
---