Board 8 > Google EXPOSED! Hard at work to manipulate search and prevent Trump re-election!

(+) Yeah! (+)

Thank goodness for whistle-blowers!

- Insider: Google is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.
- Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren misguided on breaking up Google
- Google Exec Says Dont Break Us Up: smaller companies dont have the resources to prevent next Trump situation
- Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As Right-Wing
- LEAKED Documents Highlight Machine Learning Fairness and Googles Practices to Make Search Results fair and equitable
- Documents Appear to Show Editorial Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
- Insider: Google Violates letter of the law and spirit of the law on Section 230

The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying whats fair and whats equitable so were like, well we are a big company, were going to say it. Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

Full story: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whistle-exec-reveals-google-plan-to-prevent-trump-situation-in-2020-on-hidden-cam/

Videos already removed from youtube, but you can view them in the link above.

This cannot just stay in the Nationalist politics topic.
---

Project Veritas hired a woman to pretend to be a Roy Moore victim, and when they were caught by a REAL news agency that did things like vet their sources, the head of PV pretended he had exposed the biases in mainstream media.

So yeah, if you want to believe bullshit, cite a genuine news source.
---

order corn

order corn

excuse me

please order corn
---

lmao how does vlado never learn with veritas
---

Vlado posted...

This cannot just stay in the Nationalist politics topic.

In the sense that you didn't even need to post it there, this is technically true.
---

plz
---

Lmao
---

I'm just confused why they're "revealing" that corporate execs would prefer their corporation to not get broken up.
---

Veritas is garbage that gets refuted constantly. can't believe you wasted a topic on this.
---

https://twitter.com/krangtnelson/status/1143232979784863745?s=21

Algorithmic rebiasing unfairness algorithm
---

How is this news? Google the holocaust right now and look at the lies Google is putting right there on the first page. White nationalism has been Google's enemy since day 1.
---

Jakyl25 posted...

https://twitter.com/krangtnelson/status/1143232979784863745?s=21

Algorithmic rebiasing unfairness algorithm

Lmao what the fuck
---

you're right Vlado I'm boycotting Google and switching everything to Chinese alternatives so Xi Dada can keep me safe from the greedy evil western tech companies
---

Forceful_Dragon posted...

Veritas is garbage that gets refuted constantly. can't believe you wasted a topic on this.

How did they get "refuted"? Let's see it. If the documents had been fake, goolag would've cried by now.

Instead, what we got is this: https://medium.com/@gennai.jen/this-is-not-how-i-expected-monday-to-go-e92771c7aa82

In short, "wah, people are cyber-harassing me because I am a big-wig at a corporation that wants to erase them politically." Not a single word insisting the documents were fake or anything like that.
---

Vlado posted...

Let's see it. If the documents had been fake, goolag would've cried by now.

yeah, and if alex jones were wrong about michelle obama being a man, i'm sure she would have said something about this by now. conclusion: she IS a man!

excellent reasoning you have there.
---

Was the video of the employee meeting where the bosses all whined about Trump winning also fake?

Does this look faked? https://www.projectveritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/SS1DocDump.pdf

That'd take dedication to a level that is in no way reasonable. Much more likely it's real.
---

How are you so dumb
---

Apparently, Cruz asked some random person from goolag about these things. Expectedly, didn't get much out of her.
https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/25/senator-cruz-grills-google-executive-over-insider-story/

No refutal here, either, of course.
---

Google emails leaked: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/25/breaking-new-google-document-leaked-describing-shapiro-prager-as-nazis-using-the-dogwhistles/

Holy crap, for these nutcases, even controlled opposition like Peterson, and neocons like Shapiro are "nazis."
---

Here's the video from the google employee meeting after Trump won! https://content.jwplatform.com/players/TYgVGuSC-o73dHpYz.html
---

You should try making a third topic, maybe then it'll work out for you.
---

Vlado posted...

Google emails leaked: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/25/breaking-new-google-document-leaked-describing-shapiro-prager-as-nazis-using-the-dogwhistles/

Holy crap, for these nutcases, even controlled opposition like Peterson, and neocons like Shapiro are "nazis."

->google emails leaked
-> click the link
-> its only one email

wow I cant even trust vlado to pluralize honestly, how I can believe anything he says at all?

how does exactly one email even leak? shouldnt whoever leaked it have been able to see the rest of the message chain too?
---

They haven't figured out that you can expand by clicking the three dots at the bottom yet.
---

How exactly do you decide who is "controlled opposition" and who isn't? Because if I was gonna create some controlled operation, I have to imagine a "journalistic organization" like Project Veritas would be the EXACT sort of thing you'd want, to make the opposition look like dumb, gullible morons.
---

Inviso posted...

How exactly do you decide who is "controlled opposition" and who isn't?

- See what they're shilling for
- See if they get censored

Peterson is pretty obvious controlled opposition on the top point, not to mention he's pretty much said so himself. Richard Spencer is most likely controlled opposition because far more benign conservative voices have been censored hard by google, twitter, facebook, etc., and he hasn't.
---

A good senator has proposed a bill that would force goolag and the likes to have their code audited to ensure their services' political neutrality. Of course, it'll never pass.

https://www.hawley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-06/Ending-Support-Internet-Censorship-Act-Bill-Text.pdf
---

Vlado posted...

Inviso posted...

How exactly do you decide who is "controlled opposition" and who isn't?

- See what they're shilling for
- See if they get censored

Peterson is pretty obvious controlled opposition on the top point, not to mention he's pretty much said so himself. Richard Spencer is most likely controlled opposition because far more moderate conservative voices have been censored hard by google, twitter, facebook, etc., and he hasn't.

So given that you have yet to be censored on GameFAQs, and you share all of Richard Spencers beliefs, youre controlled opposition?
---

lmao, GameFAQs...
---

You seem like controlled opposition to me.

If I wanted to make conservatives look bad, your style of gullible reposting of tabloid level trash would certainly play into the liberal stereotype of conservatives being morons.
---

You can make things up about me, sure. That won't make your claims true. :)
---

Nobody's making anything up about you. We're not Project Veritas.
---

Vlado posted...

You can make things up about me, sure. That won't make your claims true. :)

What am I making up? Youre posting Project Veritas articles. You think Seth Rich was murdered by the DNC based on a literal fake news report from (your words) globalist shills Fox News. Youre a gullible moron and literally every post in this topic, other than your own, is people laughing at how dumb you are.
---

I knew about Rich far before Fox News published it.
---

Just like how ulti got that book before it was published that ended up being rejected by the publisher, right?

You're hilarious, vloldo
---

Vlado posted...

You can make things up about me, sure. That won't make your claims true. :)

If you don't refute it then it does

You're a French bisexual kitty cat
---

I still don't understand the logic behind the DNC murdering Seth Rich. The damage was already done, what did they gain by killing him?
---

TheRock1525 posted...

I still don't understand the logic behind the DNC murdering Seth Rich. The damage was already done, what did they gain by killing him?

Warning for future would-be whistleblowers.
---

Why havent they had more people murdered like Trump or one of his kids?
---

you'd think they would at least break Eric's legs
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Why havent they had more people murdered like Trump or one of his kids?

A billionaire vs. a regular Joe. Hmm, who is harder to murder.
---

Oh so their assassins are not very good. Got it
---

Vlado posted...

TheRock1525 posted...

I still don't understand the logic behind the DNC murdering Seth Rich. The damage was already done, what did they gain by killing him?

Warning for future would-be whistleblowers.

Warnings that no one but lazy conspiracy theorists believe aren't particularly effective.
---

Vlado posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Why havent they had more people murdered like Trump or one of his kids?

A billionaire vs. a regular Joe. Hmm, who is harder to murder.

they can run an elaborate secret child trafficking ring in a pizza basement but they cant figure out how to pull a JFK on Trump? how hard can that really be?
---

Yeah the idea that the Deep State is powerful enough to drum up 6 million fake votes for Hillary but dumb enough to put them in the wrong states has always been the sort of nonsensical paradox of the whole conspiracy idea
---

like they cant convince one crazy guy that Jodie Foster will love him if he shoots Trump? Get it together, deep state.
---

Vlado posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Why havent they had more people murdered like Trump or one of his kids?

A billionaire vs. a regular Joe. Hmm, who is harder to murder.

I mean they got Tupac and Biggie pretty easily.
---

TheRock1525 posted...

Vlado posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Why havent they had more people murdered like Trump or one of his kids?

A billionaire vs. a regular Joe. Hmm, who is harder to murder.

I mean they got Tupac and Biggie pretty easily.

Think bigger! They got several Kennedys, Scalia, Michael Jackson, the list is endless! People that famous just don't die without a big conspiracy behind it of course.

None of those are bigger than Pac
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

they cant figure out how to pull a JFK on Trump?

Or maybe Trump just isn't as much of a threat as JFK was (or any threat at all).

Jakyl25 posted...

Deep State is powerful enough to drum up 6 million fake votes for Hillary

lol, you don't need a deep state for that. Just someone willing to write up votes, and nobody willing to check because they're in states where it doesn't matter. It amounts to almost nothing, just empty pep talk for the likes of Inviso (even you don't care about it because you know the rules of the game).

TheRock1525 posted...

I mean they got Tupac and Biggie pretty easily.

lmfao, imagine comparing some gangsters to a billionaire involved with pretty much all the bigwigs in the world.
---

Trump isn't a gangster just cuz he stole a ton of money. He's more like a robber.
---