Poll of the Day > Detective is FIRED for saying Protesters should SHOOT BACK at COPS! She a MILF?

Topic List
Page List: 1
mrduckbear
07/06/20 11:47:07 PM
#1:


Is Florissa a MILF?


30 y/o Rookie Springfield DETECTIVE, Florissa Fuentes has been fired after posting a picture on social media of her NIECE at a Black Lives Matter event holding a sign that suggested protesters should shoot back at cops!!

She said she was showing pride in her niece's activism in Atlanta and said the post was made on a personal account while she was off duty and she does not advocate violence against police which she ironically worked for

She said "After i posted it, i started getting calls and texts from coworkers. I was initially confused but then i realized they thought i was being anti-cop. I wasn't. I was just supporting my niece's activism. I had no malicious intent and i wouldn't put a target on my back."

"You have a lot of haters. You're going to get in trouble" said one co-worker

She said "Cap, i already know why you're calling. I'm sorry. i meant no malicious intent and i already took it down"

But Capt. Duda was mad and wanted to see her the next day

She sent a message to her colleagues writing "To my fellow officers, I recently shared a post that a family member had posted of themselves protesting the recent death of George Floyd. I did not share this photo with any malicious intent and I should have thought of how others might perceive it. I apologize to all of those who I have offended. I am not anti-cop. I wear my badge proudly and have committed my life and career to being a police officer"

But they did not support her as one told her to stay away from them and they will never associate with her.

The Captain then told her she could resign or be fired and turned in her badge and gun

Fuentes, a single mother of 3 said "I took this job to give back to the community, to the city that raised me. If ic ould get my job back, i would take it in a heartbeat"

What she posted from her niece's pic and got her fired -

https://i.imgur.com/IKcAkxx.jpg

Fuentes -

https://i.imgur.com/MApMAbh.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/4hKfV0P.jpg
---
The Users have Spoken. News Will Continue...For Now
... Copied to Clipboard!
darcandkharg31
07/06/20 11:57:36 PM
#2:


I'd let her hand cuff me.

---
The doll's trying to kill me and the toaster's been laughing at me!
If you take 110% of what I say seriously then you're gonna have a bad time.
... Copied to Clipboard!
FourthDimension
07/07/20 2:30:23 AM
#3:


Shes an idiot.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus
07/07/20 2:43:03 AM
#4:


That's probably as big of a "Fair, next" as you can get, considering she's inciting violence against police officers. And anybody without the sense to understand why not to do that has no business being a cop.

---
(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin
07/07/20 5:19:07 AM
#5:


Not only is this free speech violation, it's not even HER speech.

Hey, have you ever seen Hitler's Olympic broadcast? GUESS WHAT AUTOMATIC NAZI

---
"Salt cures Everything!"
My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos
... Copied to Clipboard!
EvilMegas
07/07/20 8:38:22 AM
#6:


Holy shit shes hot.


---
Official Former King of Black People(Lost to Joe Biden)
http://imgur.com/a/yNvXsJe
... Copied to Clipboard!
WhiskeyDisk
07/07/20 1:08:04 PM
#7:


https://i.imgur.com/pgu4Zyt.jpg

---
The SBA has closed for business, we thank you for your patronage Assassins.
~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Gaawa_chan
07/07/20 3:58:05 PM
#8:


Yeah, if a cop is trying to murder you, you're not allowed to fight back. But if a protestor is in the street, feel free to run them over.

---
Hi
... Copied to Clipboard!
Smiffwilm
07/07/20 5:14:56 PM
#9:


She's a detective yet doesn't have a clue.

---
My Mario Maker 2 ID is 6RG-5XK-JCG
... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky
07/07/20 5:30:43 PM
#10:


Apparently "don't shoot at people first if you don't want them to shoot back at you" is a controversial stance now.

I can understand cops firing her for saying it's ok to shoot police, they'll always protect and serve their own above all else. But the people in this topic slamming her is rather pathetic.

Gaawa_chan posted...
Yeah, if a cop is trying to murder you, you're not allowed to fight back. But if a protestor is in the street, feel free to run them over.
Or fire tear gas at them. Or peppery spray them. Or just start beating them with clubs. Or taze them when they're already cuffed just for funsies, then justify gunning someone down from behind because he had a tazer and it's a "lethal weapon".
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus
07/07/20 5:52:22 PM
#11:


Lokarin posted...
Not only is this free speech violation, it's not even HER speech.

It literally is her speech because it's something SHE posted on her Facebook page. She didn't post it with a message decrying the idiocy and questionable nature of the protest, she posted *just* the image which a de facto endorsement of said image. The fact that you choose to quote somebody else doesn't magically make you immune to any consequence.

As for the speech side of things, it was both an incitement to violence and something that clearly conflicts with her job.

Gaawa_chan posted...
Yeah, if a cop is trying to murder you, you're not allowed to fight back. But if a protestor is in the street

...except a cop is carrying out their duty, a protestor hasn't been charged by the state to maintain order let alone given permission to explicitly violate the law either by moving into areas explicitly banned to pedestrians or by unlawfully detaining people (which is considered a form of kidnapping depending on the jurisdiction)

streamofthesky posted...
Apparently "don't shoot at people first if you don't want them to shoot back at you" is a controversial stance now.

Now? lolwut? It's NEVER been appropriate to shoot at cops. Attacking members of law enforcement has been banned by every government that every existed and likely every government that ever will exist. The only gray area is when law enforcement fails to identify themselves, but the sign explicitly endorses violence against cops so that goes out the window.

streamofthesky posted...
I can understand cops firing her for saying it's ok to shoot police, they'll always protect and serve their own above all else. But the people in this topic slamming her is rather pathetic.

What's pathetic is an inability to understand why advocating shooting a person's own coworkers is bad.

---
(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky
07/07/20 6:10:53 PM
#12:


Zeus posted...
Now? lolwut? It's NEVER been appropriate to shoot at cops. Attacking members of law enforcement has been banned by every government that every existed and likely every government that ever will exist. The only gray area is when law enforcement fails to identify themselves, but the sign explicitly endorses violence against cops so that goes out the window.

What's pathetic is an inability to understand why advocating shooting a person's own coworkers is bad.
What's pathetic is you intentionally missing the words "protestors" and shooting "back". She wasn't advocating for people to just go murder cops. She was talking about all the innocent people that cops have fired upon.
The same side that defends owning assault weapons and massive stockpiles of guns and talks about "armed resistance" if the government ever tries to take their guns then turns around and says it's wrong to shoot at government agents (cops) that fired upon you first, because now the group in question isn't theirs.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg
07/07/20 7:04:36 PM
#13:


There is no amount of violence a law enforcement officer could inflict on me or my family that would ever warrant retaliation.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
HornedLion
07/07/20 7:11:44 PM
#14:


She said something crazy. She was right to be let go.

With that said... Id do her.

---
"Wham wham bam bam" - the sound of Microsoft getting destroyed by Sony again
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus
07/07/20 8:21:22 PM
#15:


streamofthesky posted...
What's pathetic is you intentionally missing the words "protestors" and shooting "back". She wasn't advocating for people to just go murder cops. She was talking about all the innocent people that cops have fired upon.


What's pathetic is that you believe cops are just shooting live rounds at protestors without any justification. How many protestors have been reported shot to death by cops in the past few months? ZERO. How many have been injured by actual bullets? Probably also zero. And it's pathetic to conflate non-lethal, rubber rounds with live rounds.... and even more pathetic to suggest responding to rubber rounds with live rounds.

streamofthesky posted...
The same side that defends owning assault weapons and massive stockpiles of guns and talks about "armed resistance" if the government ever tries to take their guns then turns around and says it's wrong to shoot at government agents (cops) that fired upon you first, because now the group in question isn't theirs.

You can put your strawman back next to your Dorothy and Toto. As for preppers, they're worried about ACTUAL government malfeasance, not cops trying to restore order under lawless conditions. And, I should add, if the cops weren't there to restore order, it would be up to civilians like those armed preppers to protect themselves and their neighborhoods.


---
(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin
07/07/20 9:36:15 PM
#16:


Zeus posted...
The fact that you choose to quote somebody else doesn't magically make you immune to any consequence.

You need freedom of consequence or you have no freedom at all

That's like saying "Free Water: $1.50"

---
"Salt cures Everything!"
My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus
07/07/20 10:33:19 PM
#17:


Lokarin posted...
You need freedom of consequence or you have no freedom at all

That's like saying "Free Water: $1.50"

And she was free from the consequence of being arrested, which is literally what freedom of speech entails. It stops the government for arresting you for having an opinion -- even if that opinion is empirically wrong (including claims that would get you arrested in other nations without freedom of speech provisions, such as Canada and the UK) -- limits the government's ability to censor your opinions, gives certain protections to the press, and allows peaceful assembly within certain parameters. It's not a blank check excusing any conduct, although I understand that the idea might be confusing to somebody from Canada where freedom of speech isn't really a thing and you absolutely can be arrested for voicing opinions that contradict your government.

---
(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Gaawa_chan
07/08/20 9:56:24 PM
#18:


Oh man I forgot about this topic. Okay, let' see if anyone responded to-
Oh dear.

Zeus posted...
Now? lolwut? It's NEVER been appropriate to shoot at cops.

Judging from this statement, you seem to be indicating that you think that if a cop tries to murder you, you aren't allowed to defend yourself.

Zeus posted...
...except a cop is carrying out their duty, a protestor hasn't

Zeus posted...
What's pathetic is that you believe cops are just shooting live rounds at protestors...
You can put your strawman back next to your Dorothy and Toto.

God the irony.

streamofthesky posted...
What's pathetic is you intentionally missing the words "protestors" and shooting "back". She wasn't advocating for people to just go murder cops. She was talking about all the innocent people that cops have fired upon.

This. It's hilarious that you're whining about strawmen when that's what you've been doing from the start in this topic.

So, let's ask you again, but rephrase the question. Let's look at an example for reference.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36859305

Now. This cop shot an innocent, unarmed man who had his hands up. Hypothetically, let's say that someone else in the area had a firearm and saw the cop shoot said innocent, unarmed man. Do you believe that it would be within the witness' rights to fire on the officer in order to protect the life of the victim?

And for the record, if your answer is no, then you're admitting that you think that cops are above the law and should be held to lower standards of conduct than civilians.

---
Hi
... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25
07/08/20 10:01:38 PM
#19:


She looks hot yes.

---
One who knows nothing can understand nothing.
http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/YvP6isz
... Copied to Clipboard!
afrodude77
07/08/20 10:34:12 PM
#20:


Hell yeah she a milf

---
WAR EAGLE
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1