Topic List

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

gamer_boy997

Topics: 20

Posts: 7
Last Post: 10:24:40pm, 01/13/2018
Zikten posted...
HiddenRoar posted...
2. Q: I have heard that planning for a nuclear attack from North Korea is futile given most of the population will be killed or critically injured. Is that true?
A: No. Current estimates of human casualties based on the size (yield) of North Korean nuclear weapon technology strongly suggests an explosion less than 3 miles in diameter. More than 90% of the population would survive the direct effects of such an explosion. Planning and preparedness are essential to protect those survivors from delayed residual radiation (fallout) and other effects of the attack such as the loss of utilities and communication systems, structural fires, etc.


https://www.honolulu.gov/.../HI-EMA_BMD_Question_and_Answer_AUG_2017.pdf

Shut the fuck up TC, ya haole.

10% of a state dying is a huge thing still. that would be worse than 9/11


There's about 1.4 million people in Hawaii.

Even 8% would still be over 100,000 people.

About 3,000 people died from 9/11.

So yes it would be worse than 9/11. Over 30 times worse.
---
If you believe in Jesus Christ and are 100% proud put this as your signature


Manual Topics: 0
Last Topic:
[none]

Manual Posts: 0
Last Post:
[none]
---