metallica846 posted...Veggeta X posted...
Ic3Bullet posted...
He's being skeptical about a situation that none of us were there to witness.
Except he's not just being skeptical. He's literally denying the rape actually happened and then victim blaming in a very condescending and antagonizing way.
Nope, I said 2 consenting adults were drunk when one asked to finger the other and she allegedly said yes. Now, if the woman had not said "I remember nothing" she could say "that's false I didn't want anything to do with that", and we have a case here.
He hooked up with a drunk girl and now he's facing the consequences. Period.
It's rare for prosecutors to take up such cases because an allegation of blackout drunk sex is normally not enough by itself to prove rape. Indeed, courts have overturned the very few such cases that actually ended in a conviction (see Ohio vs Iran Doss), arguing that a person merely alleging no memory of a sexual encounter due to intoxication is not sufficient evidence of rape.