This 18 y/o Blonde Kid was ARRESTED for saying F*** in front of a WOMAN!!!

18 y/o Jared Dylan Smith from Louisiana was arrested for DISTURBING THE PEACE after swore in front of a 75 y/o elderly woman!!

He was standing next to the 75 y/o when he yelled F*** and "clearly" disturbed her peace!!

He was booked for his foul language and disorderly conduct and his bond was set at $200.

He DENIED the allegation and there were no other witnesses.

Louisiana law states disturbing the peace as "addressing any offensive, derisve or annoying words to any other person who is lawfully in ANY STREET or other public place. Or call him by an offensive or derisive name, or make any noise or exclamation in his presence and hearing with the intent to deride, or annoy him or to prevent him from pursuing his lawful business, occuptation or duty"

If he is guilty he faces up 90 DAYS in JAIL and pay a fine of $100..

He was booked into Ouchita Correctional Centre and awaits sentencing..

Do you support this conservative law? let's see what people will ovte

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/04/16/21/3F4EC29C00000578-4416982-image-m-81_1492376387003.jpg

He didn't direct it at anybody so it doesn't violate that law.

A system of laws needs to match. This one would've been acceptable 80+ years ago, but now things are so liberal as to make it unrealistic. Apparently in Canada it's an arrestable offense to impersonate the Queen of England, but nobody enforces it.

What the fuck is this?

Eh, there are all sorts of crazy laws still on the books that really need to be done away with. Minor municipal laws should probably be reviewed every 20-25 years, with relatively simple votes to either retain or get rid of them.

Full Throttle posted...

Do you support this conservative law?

I'm not sure if it's necessarily conservative, you'd really need to look at who passed the law. It's certainly authoritarian, though.

TheCyborgNinja posted...

A system of laws needs to match. This one would've been acceptable 80+ years ago, but now things are so liberal as to make it unrealistic.

At no point has it ever really been acceptable. Granted, I assume it was meant to suppress rowdy immigrants, possibly as part of a "Broken Windows" policy.

Wow 100% votes.

It seems messed up but he is gross looking so i say lock him away

Mead posted...

It seems messed up but he is gross looking so i say lock him away

Eh, if he cut his hair he'd probably be handsome.

@Zeus I didn't mean the crime was acceptable, but the law itself against it.

Zeus posted...

Mead posted...

It seems messed up but he is gross looking so i say lock him away

Eh, if he cut his hair he'd probably be handsome.

But he didn't

He chose his fate

TheCyborgNinja posted...

I didn't mean the crime was acceptable, but the law itself against it.

I also meant the law was unacceptable.

Zeus posted...

TheCyborgNinja posted...

I didn't mean the crime was acceptable, but the law itself against it.

I also meant the law was unacceptable.

Well then, carry on sir.

Mead posted...

It seems messed up but he is gross looking so i say lock him away

You're jelly of his hickey

Can't wait until they add "the Internet" on there so we can all get arrested!

fuck no.

TheCyborgNinja posted...

A system of laws needs to match. This one would've been acceptable 80+ years ago, but now things are so liberal as to make it unrealistic. Apparently in Canada it's an arrestable offense to impersonate the Queen of England, but nobody enforces it.

It is an arrestable offence because she is the Queen of Canada as well, not just England. She is the head of state. You cannot go around pretending to be Justin Trudeau either.

But yeah, even in Canada, where we don't value free speech as much as Americans, this wouldn't be a real issue.