The only reason people in America think he isn't a pedosexual is because it's not normal there. So they look for other reasons, because they can't comprehend someone being a pedosexual.
Living in Japan, it's pretty normal for someone to be a pedosexual. Way more normal than homosexual at least.
miki_sauvester posted...
The only reason people in America think he isn't a pedosexual is because it's not normal there. So they look for other reasons, because they can't comprehend someone being a pedosexual.
Living in Japan, it's pretty normal for someone to be a pedosexual. Way more normal than homosexual at least.
So he would just be called a quirky shotacon in Japan?
^"Pedosexual" isn't a word, stop saying it.
As for the question you asked TC, from a legal standpoint he is undeniably Not Guilty, since he beat all 14 charges against him.
If he actually did anything or not is beyond the knowledge of anyone on this board, and most don't even have enough basic knowledge of the case to so much as speculate responsibly (not that that has ever stopped anyone).
So in short this topic is a waste of time.
I love how not a single sentence in this post is true.
By the way, Michael Jackson is really popular in Japan (might even be more popular these days per capita than US), and most of his fans here assume that he is a shotacon. In fact, that is part of his appeal for some people. Really goes to show how far behind America is culturally when it comes to this issue.
Your gimmick is crap.
The only reason people in America think he isn't a pedosexual is because it's not normal there. So they look for other reasons, because they can't comprehend someone being a pedosexual.
Living in Japan, it's pretty normal for someone to be a pedosexual. Way more normal than homosexual at least.
Really goes to show how far behind America is culturally when it comes to this issue.
Innocent
He was a guy with a massively fucked up childhood so he was basically just a childlike adult to make up for it. He was just a friend to those kids
The investigators found a sickening collection of pornography that included images and footage of naked children and adults, as well as animal torture, bondage and sado-masochism.
Some of the children pictured were bleeding or in pain, while naked adults had childrens faces superimposed on them. And the collection was extensive as well as books, notes, documents, photos and audiotapes, police seized more than 80 videos as well as computer hard drives.
ReggieTheReckless posted...
Innocent
He was a guy with a massively fucked up childhood so he was basically just a childlike adult to make up for it. He was just a friend to those kids
http://dailym.ai/2Dap7rK
The investigators found a sickening collection of pornography that included images and footage of naked children and adults, as well as animal torture, bondage and sado-masochism.
Some of the children pictured were bleeding or in pain, while naked adults had childrens faces superimposed on them. And the collection was extensive as well as books, notes, documents, photos and audiotapes, police seized more than 80 videos as well as computer hard drives.
Believe what ya want, but this shouldnt just be briskly disregarded because you liked the guy.
As always, misinformation Mead is lying to you and here's an article discussing these "findings" which, by the way, were less salacious than claimed and known about for over a decade
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/no-child-porn-found-at-neverland-thenor-now-the_us_577fdfbce4b0f06648f4a3f8
The only reason people in America think he isn't a pedosexual is because it's not normal there. So they look for other reasons, because they can't comprehend someone being a pedosexual.
Living in Japan, it's pretty normal for someone to be a pedosexual. Way more normal than homosexual at least.
all mead did was literally post an article and quoted it
your article says the exact same thing his does, btw.
it doesn't matter if the porn is in an "art" book, it's still porn dude.
im pretty sure he was guilty. the parents heard he slept in the same bed and tried to sue him due to the implication of that. it's not hard to believe he slept in the same bed in the kid without touching them.
ssj4supervegeta posted...
im pretty sure he was guilty. the parents heard he slept in the same bed and tried to sue him due to the implication of that. it's not hard to believe he slept in the same bed in the kid without touching them.
Considering the parent of at least one child admitted to making the whole thing up and another child's brother was outed over lying, it seems unlikely
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jackson-accusers-mom-admits-lies/
https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/63806/brother-of-jackson-accuser-admits-lying
I love how not a single sentence in this post is true.
Overlooking your cultural conflation for a moment, if it was actual pornography, MJ would have gone to jail over it.
Anyone that thinks he wasnt guilty should feel confident letting their kids or young relatives have an unsupervised sleepover with any other gentleman that similarly had a messed up childhood.
Zeus posted...
Overlooking your cultural conflation for a moment, if it was actual pornography, MJ would have gone to jail over it.
because we've never seen instances where someone should unequivocally go to prison for something and instead get a slap on the wrist, right?
miki_sauvester posted...
I love how not a single sentence in this post is true.
Pedosexual isn't a word though.