I also guarantee he won't be fired.
Do you think what he said was pedophilic?
But was she in fact a hot piece of ass?
Age of Consent in many jurisdictions of the civilized world is 16. You can call him skeezy, but you can't call him pedo.
Kungfu Kenobi posted...
Age of Consent in many jurisdictions of the civilized world is 16. You can call him skeezy, but you can't call him pedo.
Age of consent has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia.
Age of consent has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia.
Revelation34 posted...
Age of consent has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia.
So what would you call a adult who is sexually attracted to 13 - 15 year olds when the age of consent is 16?
wwinterj25 posted...
Revelation34 posted...
Age of consent has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia.
So what would you call a adult who is sexually attracted to 13 - 15 year olds when the age of consent is 16?
An ebephile.
An ebephile.
Revelation34 posted...
Age of consent has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia.
So what would you call a adult who is sexually attracted to 13 - 15 year olds when the age of consent is 16?
Melon_Master literally said what is was in post #9...
Lokarin posted...
An ebephile.
Hebephile? I learned a new word.
jebephile :ehhhhhh
Kungfu Kenobi posted...
Age of Consent in many jurisdictions of the civilized world is 16. You can call him skeezy, but you can't call him pedo.
Age of consent has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia.
She's 17 so what he said can't be pedophilic.
Was expecting a hottie, shes rather meh.
In what delusional world is 17 pedophilia?
In what delusional world is 17 pedophilia?
The crazy SJW virtue-signaling world, mostly.
Zeus posted...
The crazy SJW virtue-signaling world, mostly.
Pedophilia is what most people call it, not just sjws.
I also guarantee he won't be fired.
Surprisingly he was fired, I thought at most he'll be suspended temporarily. I am not familiar with this radio station or Connor but does he normally make comments like this or is it out of the norm for him?
Fired for no reason then. Too many morons catering to SJWs nowadays.
It literally wasn't that bad... She'll be 18 in two months.
Revelation34 posted...
Fired for no reason then. Too many morons catering to SJWs nowadays.
Too be fair, if it can potentially hurt the business, that is a good enough of a reason to let him go. Standing up against the SJWs doesn't pay the bills. The public as a whole can be outrageous at times but one must sometime stand with them to make a living.
LinkPizza posted...
It literally wasn't that bad... She'll be 18 in two months.
Personally the comment in regards to her age is not an issue with me. It's just the comment itself being done on open radio that I find bizarre. I don't hold it against him but I do consider it to be a dumb thing to say. Such comments are best left to private conversations.
Hurt what business? They have no business already.
Revelation34 posted...
Hurt what business? They have no business already.
Number of listeners then? I assume most radio shows/channels make money from advertisements and if the number of listeners goes down, companies might pull back their advertisements.
They already don't have a lot.
Revelation34 posted...
They already don't have a lot.
Then I guess the owner(s) didn't want to risk losing what few they have then. Regardless of how little business or few listeners they may have, if the owner(s) felt Connor's action will hurt them either immediately or in the long run, that is enough cause to let him go. Being that it isn't our business, what would you suggest to said owner(s) that there was no need to fire Connor?
Because he didn't say anything that bad.