Rockstar turning GTA and Red Dead into online games basically killed them for me

Current Events

Current Events » Rockstar turning GTA and Red Dead into online games basically killed them for me
I've always been more interested in the story missions, and while I do side missions and a ton of driving around randomly in GTA, giving us tons of microtransactions, online lobbies and having to deal with an online community to just do races with no context etc. it really killed my enthusiasm. When I briefly tried it there was half dead cities, a few griefers making races with a million laps to get everyone to drop out, and repetions of the same generic kill x people at x place and oh one got in a car, and he escaped to the other side of the map but the event isn't ending because this is an online mode. People have been talking about more elaborate heists and such, but I honestly can't bring myself to care. If they at least had some sort of story mode in the online that would be one thing, like WOW has for example, but I don't just want a forever sandbox, I'm more interested in one curated finite single player experience.

Shame one of the more fun series out there isn't interested in it any more.
My Real Blog https://veryrealwow.wixsite.com/website
Send a PM with questions and I will reply on my blog. If desired, request a pseudonym.
And a bunch of their top guys left too
It'll be interesting to see how GTA VI turns out with all the changes internally in Rockstar.
One of the brothers is still there right? Just the other 2 dudes left.
Gamertag: F1RE v2 PSN ID: F1REx
www.Twitch.tv/f1rev2
Yeah dude, why the flip dont Rockstar have a single player story for GTA5 and Red Dead! Theyd sell like gangbusters!

.....oh wait, they did and this topic is stupid? Oh.
This is a cool sig
Red Dead 2 Online was garbage when it released and I never went back to it.
Smashingpmkns posted...
Red Dead 2 Online was garbage when it released and I never went back to it.

Same here
Brady will never receive a HOF vote. He has been blackballed for cheating. - DeadCellReborn
Smashingpmkns posted...
Red Dead 2 Online was garbage when it released and I never went back to it.

It just rang of them trying to get a few more dollars out of Red Dead Redemption. They knew they weren't going to supplant GTA Online, because there's only so many interesting things you can do with horses and guns.
Face it Cloud is a gaming icon and has appered in lots of games while mario has only appeared in 2 games sunshine and 64 ~xSlashbomBx
Red Dead definitely isnt an online game. The main story is great and well written. It goes straight into the events of RDR1 and nothing in the main game drives you to online play. I think its more set up for a side story DLC with Sadie or Charles than GTA V is set up for anyone.

Personally i dont get the hate for GTA V not getting single player DLC. The story was fine and ended fine IMO. The main characters were ok but not some unforgettable classics. So i've always been good at where it ended. I personally dont like the idea of play to win for it but they give out free DLC and keep the community flowing with new content.
If idiots wanna keep paying for 100 dollar shark cards then thats on them
The night brims with defiled scum,and is permeated by their rotten stench.
Just think. Now you're all set to hunt and kill to your heart's content.
But it still offers a massive, expansive quality single player experience that is larger than probably 80% of most single player only games that people don't complain about. That's what I don't understand about these arguments. People play Resident Evil, rebuy the remasters, which can be beaten in 10 hours or under easily. You can put 50+ hours into GTAV or 100+ easy in either Red Dead single player and it's always "how dare they ruin it with online"

You pay the same price for both games, and they go on sale a lot also. You get a hell of a lot more of a single player experience with these games over so many others that are widely praised. This argument just gets stale after it's been posted hundreds of times.
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign, Twenty million starving and writhing in pain. =~=;
Vicious_Dios Original - https://tinyurl.com/y9fpdoll
Time to catch up on Saints Row.
It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha."
https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv
Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
Yeah dude, why the flip dont Rockstar have a single player story for GTA5 and Red Dead! Theyd sell like gangbusters!

.....oh wait, they did and this topic is stupid? Oh.

Im more wondering what the future of the franchise will look at this point. Have they announced a GTA 6?
My Real Blog https://veryrealwow.wixsite.com/website
Send a PM with questions and I will reply on my blog. If desired, request a pseudonym.
I4NRulez posted...
Personally i dont get the hate for GTA V not getting single player DLC. The story was fine and ended fine IMO.
I agree. I have no problem with GTA V itself, Im just unsure if they want to make more single player games? If they bring out some more single player heavy gta in the future, Ill stand corrected, Im simply saying if online is the future of the franchise, I wish them well but Im done.
My Real Blog https://veryrealwow.wixsite.com/website
Send a PM with questions and I will reply on my blog. If desired, request a pseudonym.
Smashingpmkns posted...
Red Dead 2 Online was garbage when it released and I never went back to it.
No kidding. That first Saturday I had a migrane after running into bullshit all day because someone thought forcing everyone together into lobbies with auto-aim was a great fucking idea. Haven't played it since.
But Red Dead Redemption 2 has a ton of shit to explore and discover from what I've read (have only played a few hours of it myself).

I do think GTA 5 is a little simple in the singleplayer once you complete the story content. Unless you like minisubbing around for nuclear waste over a four hour time frame >_>
FFXIV: Lucius Hexenseele (Brynhildr) | RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC/Fish/Cook/Fletch/Div/Mining/Smithing/Thieving/Crafting/RC
https://letterboxd.com/BMovieBro/
rockstar can enjoy deez nuts after the shitshow rdo was. Probably the only game company where its just like nah Im good at this point
Surf
I4NRulez posted...
Personally i dont get the hate for GTA V not getting single player DLC. The story was fine and ended fine IMO. The main characters were ok but not some unforgettable classics. So i've always been good at where it ended. I personally dont like the idea of play to win for it but they give out free DLC and keep the community flowing with new content.
If idiots wanna keep paying for 100 dollar shark cards then thats on them

My biggest complaint is that they added big things to GTA Online that aren't accessible in single player like the Casino. Why the fuck can't I access the Casino in single player? Also the new shopping mall I'm assume will be online only as well. There is zero reason for those not being available in single player other than R* simply doesn't give a shit about GTA players who don't play online.
E-A-G-L-E-S
EAGLES
Hexenherz posted...
But Red Dead Redemption 2 has a ton of shit to explore and discover from what I've read (have only played a few hours of it myself).
The whole first game I changed my outfit like two or three times and mostly just resummoned the horse Id gotten from some dlc it found or something that gave me a resummonable horse. This new game expects me to manage stamina gauges, keep track of clothing for weather conditions and manage the health of horses. Thats just... not as chill as before.
My Real Blog https://veryrealwow.wixsite.com/website
Send a PM with questions and I will reply on my blog. If desired, request a pseudonym.
same
There won't be any more trouble, you'll be dragged from the rubble when the lights come on
MyMainAccount posted...
The whole first game I changed my outfit like two or three times and mostly just resummoned the horse Id gotten from some dlc it found or something that gave me a resummonable horse. This new game expects me to manage stamina gauges, keep track of clothing for weather conditions and manage the health of horses. Thats just... not as chill as before.
Yeah but that doesn't have as much to do with the online portion as it does them just trying to make it more real I think.

I read a lot about shaving and stuff beforehand and was expecting to waste a lot of time doing secondary BS like that and it really didn't turn out that way >_>. idk.
FFXIV: Lucius Hexenseele (Brynhildr) | RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC/Fish/Cook/Fletch/Div/Mining/Smithing/Thieving/Crafting/RC
https://letterboxd.com/BMovieBro/
Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
Yeah dude, why the flip dont Rockstar have a single player story for GTA5 and Red Dead! Theyd sell like gangbusters!

.....oh wait, they did and this topic is stupid? Oh.
This post is stupid

R* would put out quality sp games every year, then stopped when gtao made them 14 mil in its first year. All we got since was rdr2, and its the same shit
"May the Father of Understanding guide you."
http://error1355.com/ce/Lordgold666.html
Lordgold666 posted...
This post is stupid

R* would put out quality sp games every year, then stopped when gtao made them 14 mil in its first year. All we got since was rdr2, and its the same shit

This post is stupid

Really curious to know what you mean when you say Red Dead 2 is the same shit.

These guys are putting out quadruple A games for the same price as any other. Guess what happened after GTA Online made bank? We got the absolutely sublime single player experience of Red Dead 2.

Theyre still making single player games, theyre just putting a lot more time and attention in them.
This is a cool sig
lol tc too scared of a little competition
Bored of no story mode.
My Real Blog https://veryrealwow.wixsite.com/website
Send a PM with questions and I will reply on my blog. If desired, request a pseudonym.
Fuck story mode, I love what they did with GTA Online.
Thank You BasedGod!
https://imgur.com/TdWrPRT
Heavy_D_Forever posted...
I4NRulez posted...
Personally i dont get the hate for GTA V not getting single player DLC. The story was fine and ended fine IMO. The main characters were ok but not some unforgettable classics. So i've always been good at where it ended. I personally dont like the idea of play to win for it but they give out free DLC and keep the community flowing with new content.
If idiots wanna keep paying for 100 dollar shark cards then thats on them

My biggest complaint is that they added big things to GTA Online that aren't accessible in single player like the Casino. Why the fuck can't I access the Casino in single player? Also the new shopping mall I'm assume will be online only as well. There is zero reason for those not being available in single player other than R* simply doesn't give a shit about GTA players who don't play online.

Yeah that shit sucks hard.

Not to mention I'm pretty sure one of the VAs confirmed he was recording lines for DLC, years ago. And obviously that never came
Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
This post is stupid

Really curious to know what you mean when you say Red Dead 2 is the same shit.

These guys are putting out quadruple A games for the same price as any other. Guess what happened after GTA Online made bank? We got the absolutely sublime single player experience of Red Dead 2.

Theyre still making single player games, theyre just putting a lot more time and attention in them.
Youre right, ill leave you to your gtav and rdr2 story dlcs
"May the Father of Understanding guide you."
http://error1355.com/ce/Lordgold666.html
DarthAragorn posted...
Yeah that shit sucks hard.

Not to mention I'm pretty sure one of the VAs confirmed he was recording lines for DLC, years ago. And obviously that never came

Ouch. I thought a lot of the GTA IV dlc was really good usage of the assets to basically make two more smaller GTA games.
My Real Blog https://veryrealwow.wixsite.com/website
Send a PM with questions and I will reply on my blog. If desired, request a pseudonym.
Current Events » Rockstar turning GTA and Red Dead into online games basically killed them for me