We really need to stop making these topics until volatility makes it fun again.
Bump
Rate slashes will be fun times.The only slashing will be to stock prices.
Been boring lately
I got in on Intel when it was hovering around 30 and I'm seriously contemplating doubling down even thought it's sitting at 47 right now. It feels so undervalued still.Future is ARM. I think Intel is possibly undervalued but ARM is a better long term investment.
Future is ARM. I think Intel is possibly undervalued but ARM is a better long term investment.The future is RISC-V. The ARM IPO was the exit strat to squeeze out money before the downfall.
The future is RISC-V. The ARM IPO was the exit strat to squeeze out money before the downfall.RISC-V is an assembly implementation standard. The R in ARM is literally "RISC"
RISC-V is an assembly implementation standard. The R in ARM is literally "RISC"RISC-V is an instruction set, but the surrounding ecosystem in general is far more open than ARM and cheaper to implement since there are also free and open implementations. It's finding its way into more and more embedded applications and from there it's working its way up. There's still a ways to go, but it offers many advantages over ARM cost-wise, especially since ARM has been putting the screws to licensees lately to squeeze more profits. There are also benefits in extensibility.
RISC-V is an instruction set, but the surrounding ecosystem in general is far more open than ARM and cheaper to implement since there are also free and open implementations. It's finding its way into more and more embedded applications and from there it's working its way up. There's still a ways to go, but it offers many advantages over ARM cost-wise, especially since ARM has been putting the screws to licensees lately to squeeze more profits. There are also benefits in extensibility.
damnit, I'm still not richAfter it pumped so ridiculously high and right before China floods the market with cheap EVs? Good luck.
is it time to throw caution to the winds and go all in on Tesla?
ARM is a hardware company and their hardware supports RISC-V. All they have to do is actually implement it.You don't seem to understand what RISC-V is. It's a competitor. ARM isn't going to come out with RISC-V designs.
I don't see them stopping their current implementations but they could easily make both at the same time.
You don't seem to understand what RISC-V is. It's a competitor. ARM isn't going to come out with RISC-V designs.
Just like Intel would never adopt AMDx64, right?RISC-V and ARM do not have compatible instructions sets. AMD's 64-bit extensions to x86 are just that, extensions to x86, which both Intel and AMD are using.
RISC-V and ARM do not have compatible instructions sets. AMD's 64-bit extensions to x86 are just that, extensions to x86, which both Intel and AMD are using.
Intel's original x64 wasn't compatible with either AMDx64 or the old IBMx86. They dropped it in favor of the better standard.Did you miss the part where the AMD 64-bit *extensions* are *extensions* to x86? It's compatible and can be incorporated into x86 because it was explicitly designed that way (obviously, because it's an *extension* of x86). Also, what the fuck is IBMx86? You're just pulling things out of your ass.
ARM chips already have the architecture needed to support a RISC-V implementation, all they have to do is just implement it.
Also, what the fuck is IBMx86?
Speaking of pulling things out of your ass, what do you mean by "the architecture" needed to support a RISC-V implementation? I'd love to hear your explanation on this so I can laugh some more.
The other chip IBM made back in the day alongside PPC which is what apple used. (I think IBM may have made even more but those are the only two anyone cares about. I think the last thing that used PPC seriously was the Nintendo Wii).Do you have any model numbers? I can't find anything about this.
I'm talking about the number and type of registers. ARM designed microprocessors match the specifications set by RISC-V. The only difference is the actual instruction set.A difference which is key and makes it incompatible.