https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/8/8e654434.jpgI haven't been following this soap opera, who are Merchant and Bradley?
The judge might need to sanction these people
So there's a significant concern that I believe folks are missing.Reading the transcript I thought it was really odd. The other side kept objecting on the basis of foundation because the examining attorney kept saying variations of do you remember when you told me XYZ? which apparently hadnt been introduced into the trial before.
Merchant's examination, especially when she's referring to what Bradley "told [her]" and their text message exchanges, raises the potential that she should be testifying as a witness instead.
Really toeing some ethical lines with this.
Reading the transcript I thought it was really odd. The other side kept objecting on the basis of foundation because the examining attorney kept saying variations of do you remember when you told me XYZ? which apparently hadnt been introduced into the trial before.Should just be "objection hearsay" and be done with it
I haven't been following this soap opera, who are Merchant and Bradley?
So there's a significant concern that I believe folks are missing.
Merchant's examination, especially when she's referring to what Bradley "told [her]" and their text message exchanges, raises the potential that she should be testifying as a witness instead.
Really toeing some ethical lines with this.
Trials can be so fucking stupid sometimes. There are endless conversations about the right way to ask questions. The movies never show this shit!
Should just be "objection hearsay" and be done with it
Whats going on with the woman with the thing in her mouth?A stenomask. For privileged conversations and dictation.
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1762587830474174901Maybe he was Jeffrey Toobin' himself
Yeah, looks like just yet another delay tactic
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1762587830474174901And Jesus said "Let he who has never zoomed in his boxer shorts cast the first stone "
https://twitter.com/BidenHQ/status/1762179290152534313
Jim Jordan is publishing his findings on twitter now after failing to get anything done in congress?They're putting it out because they're going to attempt to impeach him soon.
So this is good right?
https://twitter.com/Brandi_Buchman/status/1762607797500330354Who is this dude Usopp?
So this is good right?
Mmh.. I wonder why she ruled against Trump
Mmh.. I wonder why she ruled against TrumpI honestly believe she's trying to appear unbiased until it's late enough in the game she can destroy the case and they can't salvage it.
Mmh.. I wonder why she ruled against TrumpWell it's not technically a ruling against Trump, just his lackeys. Trump doesn't give a shit about those guys.
Mmh.. I wonder why she ruled against Trump
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1762587830474174901Helpful yellow circle so people know where to look.
Would lying to investigators be a probation violation
I still dont understand why it has taken over 3 years to start really moving on this
I still dont understand why it has taken over 3 years to start really moving on thisMerrick Garland