They're not trying to be transparent and clear. They're purposely trying to be vague to have a better chance to get rid of us.
Apparently any topic involving pictures of people is considered objectifying and thus "hornyposting".I didn't see this topic of yours and this is probably pointless to ask but I'll ask anyway.
I would like to thank the mod who let me know this and deleted my topic about modestly dressed women.
When I say that, yeah, I'm referring to the ones who are making the rules, which would be Fandom.
I didn't see this topic of yours and this is probably pointless to ask but I'll ask anyway.
Was your topic actually a modest picture of a woman talking about something innocent. Or was it a topic with a picture of woman with the topic trying to be coy in what the objective was like, "let's talk about her personality *winks*.
I didn't see this topic of yours and this is probably pointless to ask but I'll ask anyway.It was a photo of a woman in a niqab.
Was your topic actually a modest picture of a woman talking about something innocent. Or was it a topic with a picture of woman with the topic trying to be coy in what the objective was like, "let's talk about her personality *winks*.
It was a photo of a woman in a niqab.
You can maybe argue he was snarky as fuck but that wasn't even close to a "tiptoe around the limits" topic.
Anyone with even a hint of community insight would know how this was going to play out in the beginning.
It's a pretty significant change. Anyone with even a hint of community insight would know how this was going to play out in the beginning. That said, I would still caution trying to intentionally toe the line and becoming disruptive.
It was a photo of a woman in a niqab.If this is true, than ya, Fandom needs to clearly define what "hornyposting" is.
You can maybe argue he was snarky as fuck but that wasn't even close to a "tiptoe around the limits" topic.
I've been here since the site launched, made an account a good bit later though, and I have to say this seems like a clown show to the point I'm considering moving on. This site was already kinda on life support but I loved it anyway, the one thing I can't understand is giving one of the most popular boards a hotshot of cyanide through privating it and complete failure of communication on an epic scale.
customers
I should've been more clear myself. Sorry about that.I love it when users can get along like this. I hope you two can be friends.
I've disputed it!Nice! Keep us posted
Mostly to see if I can get some clarification of the rule.
I originally wasn't going to because I didn't lose any karma or get a Warning or anything, so I didn't really care that much.
Yeah.
I would have understood if the topic got modded for trolling. There would have been some logic to that, because it was snarky and provocative.
But it got actually modded for "offensive material" because it was "objectiving people".
The content/images got modded, not the topic itself.
......would I get put in time out if I posted the EU x-blades boxart even though a picture of the game exists in gamefaq's video game box art images?Man, remember when Gamefaqs had screenshots of hentai games? I think some of them were direct links to some other websight. That was a long ass time ago.
I want to post it, but I don't know if I can anymore lol.
I wonder if they cracked down on all those fucking awful horny shitpost ads.Seems like a pretty big oversight to be honest.
Historically "the moderation reason is wrong" has never been valid but ok fine. That's not what happened. The mod went out of their way to make a statement about policy in the moderation.TBH, the lack of back and forth communication is really frustrating. That's part of why we've been encouraging people to ask questions about their moderations on AtM before they dispute if they're confused about something. I'll try to send it up the line to highlight it when the guidelines get updated.
I've disputed it!
Mostly to see if I can get some clarification of the rule.
I originally wasn't going to because I didn't lose any karma or get a Warning or anything, so I didn't really care that much.
TBH, the lack of back and forth communication is really frustrating. That's part of why we've been encouraging people to ask questions about their moderations on AtM before they dispute if they're confused about something. I'll try to send it up the line to highlight it when the guidelines get updated.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/10-ask-the-mods
Excellent. A good follow up to the previous one from the other channel that he mentioned. They were once upon a time discussing their wiki's, but now those same poor vague rules and communication, inconsistency is bleeding into here.
What'd you think of the video?
There are currently FIVE unanswered questions there regarding the new rules. Ask the Mods is completely useless for this.
My topic has been restored, but no direct response to my dispute.
Exit: so far anyway.
We dont have the ability to respond to disputes regardless of their status.I remember we used to get responses back in the day, I haven't had a moderation to dispute in a while.
Wait, how is that possible? I thought that Offensive posting came with a mandatory karma loss.
I remember we used to get responses back in the day, I haven't had a moderation to dispute in a while.This is true. My first ever mod I responded/was responded to. Guess that's not done much anymore. Sometimes you need to explain things to dispute but these days it's more a one and done; "not up for debate" parent style of denial.
That said, I would still caution trying to intentionally toe the line and becoming disruptive.
Which again, wouldn't be a problem if we had clear rules instead of, like I said, nothing but horrible, completely arbitrary misinterpretations of supposed, meaningless rules."Don't toe the line."
Modsnodnt have the ability to respond to disputes anymore? Holy shit I might actually look at my moderations now.That's been the case for over a year.