Moderating everyone in a controversial thread individually...

Current Events

Current Events » Moderating everyone in a controversial thread individually...
...before moderating the thread itself.

Petty?
Anyone who doesn't agree is part of the problem.
I remember the "Counting Topic" massacre wherein a mod deleted every post individually rather than the entire topic.

It was not a pretty sight...
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Do not write in this space.
What did l miss?
GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
Foppe posted...
What did l miss?

Me thinking out loud (for lack of a better term) about what might happen to me in that freedom of speech topic on the PS5 board if it gets modded for "politics outside CE" and the mod decides everyone who chose to engage needs to be taught a lesson and not just the instigator.
Anyone who doesn't agree is part of the problem.
Post #5 was unavailable or deleted.
It's certainly a lot more work.

But sometimes it is important to have additonal post in the topic modded to provide context on the topic itself as it isn't uncommon to have bad faith topics made but with innocuous first post.
1 line break(s), 160 characters allowed
Oh. Does this have a history? Has it happened already?
Above all things, never be afraid. The enemy who forces you to retreat is himself afraid of you at that very moment.
Compsognathus posted...
It's certainly a lot more work.

But sometimes it is important to have additonal post in the topic modded to provide context on the topic itself as it isn't uncommon to have bad faith topics made but with innocuous first post.

Yeah but I already get it (at least in my example). The topic was never on strong footing permissibly but I felt what I wanted to post in it was well thought out and worth saying. To delete individual posts for "politics outside CE" before deleting the topic itself for that just comes off as "we made these rules for a reason and these little shits think they're safe by letting the TC take the fall while they freely sling political rhetoric around on GameFAQs, time for a reality check."

Basically a "You should all KNOW better but since you're all complicit by taking advantage of someone else's bad choice to make your own bad choice on top of it then consequences will be issued to everyone. The TC being wrong doesn't make it okay for the rest of you to join in."

Gee, thanks.
Anyone who doesn't agree is part of the problem.
People wouldn't accept that role for free if they didn't get enjoyment out of modding. Asking them to delete the thread and not hit every post they can is like asking a fat kid to only eat one slice of pizza.
This is where cool people write stuff.
HylianFox posted...
I remember the "Counting Topic" massacre wherein a mod deleted every post individually rather than the entire topic.

It was not a pretty sight...
I remember a topic on the Guild Wars 2 board where someone asked a super dumb question (can't remember what it was at this point) where the answer was no. As I ended up going to the topic pretty much the second it opened I ended up replying with the simple "no" within the minute of it being up.

This caused a massive glomp onto the topic in which nearly a hundred other people chimed in with some variation of no, before all of them ended up getting modded (mine was the only one left). It was a massacre.
"A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet! "
My FC is in my profile.
Were you bootlicking Nintendo again?
Lancool II | Z690 Tomahawk |12700K | Fuma 2 | RTX 3070Ti | 16GB
3600MHz | FireCuda 530 1TB | Inland NVMe 1TB | RM750x
Reverse of that is thread is fine and makes it to several pages with no issues.
Someone enters thread and slings shit. Multiple people call them out for it and get modded but they don't.
Current Events » Moderating everyone in a controversial thread individually...