It's easily the worst out of the trilogy
Ever notice how the 5 Indy movies are very similar to the 5 Die Hard movies quality-wise?
In both series:
The first movies are iconic
The second are considered less than the originals but still good
The third have a jump back to the quality of the first ones
The fourth movies are very divisive, full of a lot of ridiculousness
And most people agree neither should've had a 5th movie.
Rewatched the first three about a year ago. Temple is honestly just straight up embarrassing.I wonder how many Temple fans just haven't seen it in a long time. I loved it some 25 years ago but on a rewatch about 10 years ago not so much.
I wonder how many Temple fans just haven't seen it in a long time. I loved it some 25 years ago but on a rewatch about 10 years ago not so much.
doom's last 30 minutes or so are amazing BUT you had to slog through an hour and 30 minutes of meh-ness and an annoying sidekick and an EXTRA annoying heroine.
also Skull gets WAY too much hate. yeah Shia sucks and most of the action sequences involving him are bad but everything else is pretty great. and don't start me on the complaining about aliens. god melting nazi faces and men getting their hearts ripped out of their bodies is cool but not aliens? GTFO.
I wonder how many Temple fans just haven't seen it in a long time. I loved it some 25 years ago but on a rewatch about 10 years ago not so much.
What floors me is some people out there who say Skull was better than Temple.
Literally just rewatched it a week ago along with the other two movies, and it's fine. You assume too much.No, I wonder about something that I have now gained two data points on.
Temple is great. Calling it the worst of the OG trilogy seems harsh, even if i love the other two more, because all three movies are terrific.