it's not
It isn't.
it's not
even if its not bad for us, its definitely bad for the animals :(Have they considered not b ing so tasty?
no it definitely is bad for youok vegan
It's not bad for us, but we're not meant to eat it so much. You point out that we have canines, but they're small compared to lions and wolves who do need to eat more meat than us. Humans are primates and primates evolved to have a mixed diet. Meat is good, but you still need to eat more fruits and vegetables to have a healthy diet.This
Not trying to preach, I'm still gonna eat a good steak lol
It's not bad for us, but we're not meant to eat it so much. You point out that we have canines, but they're small compared to lions and wolves who do need to eat more meat than us. Humans are primates and primates evolved to have a mixed diet. Meat is good, but you still need to eat more fruits and vegetables to have a healthy diet.
Not trying to preach, I'm still gonna eat a good steak lol
We have canine teeth!Hey it's the big cat guy. Are all your topics about nature,?
Hey it's the big cat guy. Are all your topics about nature,?No.
No.How about who would win in fight male lion or Tiger ? Seems an extremely high percentage of people think tiger. This has been like hotly debated for many many decades. Iirc though interestingly on zoos where they have ample food, seems the Siberian tigers frame is the largest of all and can supports the most weight . Is that what you've read , also do you like going to zoos to view big cats?
How about who would win in fight male lion or Tiger ? Seems an extremely high percentage of people think tiger. This has been like hotly debated for many many decades. Iirc though interestingly on zoos where they have ample food, seems the Siberian tigers frame is the largest of all and can supports the most weight . Is that what you've read , also do you like going to zoos to view big cats?
The fight is 50/50.Are you sure about this, I read like in the Siberian tigers natural range food is extremely scarce , in zoos where they have food, their frames are the largest of all. Also read that both on avg outweigh the male lion by like 50 lbs, male lion a better fighter?
The Bengal tiger is larger than than the Siberian (Amur) tiger.
We're not supposed to only eat meat. Those "carnivore diet" people are delusional. Liver King is probably going to die in his sixties.
Honestly it's better to eat more fish as long as it isn't like Tuna with all the mercury in it.
even if its not bad for us, its definitely bad for the animals :(That's why I'm a vegetarian.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/whats-the-beef-with-red-meatWhile the doctor phrased it that way, he didn't actually refer to any research that differentiated between unprocessed and processed red meat. The majority of literature doesn't make this distinction.
" Red and processed meats do increase health risks"
-Harvard
I thought it was too late, all fish heck all seafood is full of mercury, and we've irrevocably screwed up the ocean, type of fish won't matter.That's why you gotta eat sardines
Tuna steak is so good it literally tastes like eating a regular steak only more delicious somehow. Really is a shame how much of it is canned when seared tuna is just scrumptious.
Are you sure about this, I read like in the Siberian tigers natural range food is extremely scarce , in zoos where they have food, their frames are the largest of all. Also read that both on avg outweigh the male lion by like 50 lbs, male lion a better fighter?
Honestly it's better to eat more fish as long as it isn't like Tuna with all the mercury in it.Tuna and related mercury fish are also fine as long as you keep under a certain amount each week
And? The zoo is not a natural environment. The wild and natural bengal tiger is bigger than the Amur tiger. A 50 lb weight wont sway the fight when the lion is arguably the more intelligent fighter.Yeah you believe this too, the male lion is a much better fighter and much more aggressive?
Yeah you believe this too, the male lion is a much better fighter and much more aggressive?
Early humans ate less meat, were more active and died a lot younger than modern humans. Eating less meat and being more active helps mitigate a lot of meat's negative properties and frankly their shorter life-spans meant that they likely died of any number of things before meat-induced heart disease had a chance to kill them.Early humans you say, how many yrs ago and what part of world?
Considering that meat was calorie and protein dense and the human brain is a very energyintensive organ. It was well-worth the trade to add meat to the diet. But in modern days we have gone way too heavy in meat based diets. It's far in excess of what our bodies need so the negatives start to outweigh the positives.mand
Early humans you say, how many yrs ago and what part of world?
without any upsideSaying that a grass-fed steak has NO upsides like protein, B-vitamins, CLA, and Omega-3s is pretty extreme.