He's seriously bitching about having to walk up a flight of stairs.
Someone should write to Brendan Carr and ask why this type of hate speech is ok for cable.I mean, I despise Watters & Co. as much as anyone, but that's an easy question to answer. The FCC has no power over cable networks because they're pay networks. All the FCC can oversee are broadcast networks.
I mean, I despise Watters & Co. as much as anyone, but that's an easy question to answer. The FCC has no power over cable networks because they're pay networks. All the FCC can oversee are broadcast networks.
What a dumb fucking postWhat a dumb fucking overreaction. And Jesse Watters saying inflammatory shit to get a reaction is normal on Fox News whether I post about it or not.
Stop normalizing the insanity
Holy moly
Isnt this the guy whose own family hates him?His mom votes left and she is ashamed of her son
What a dumb fucking overreaction. And Jesse Watters saying inflammatory shit to get a reaction is normal on Fox News whether I post about it or not.Then just fucking ignore it then and stop making your annoyance our problem.
To the other posts pointing out that he has a massive audience, yes he does, and frequently making headlines about the aforementioned dumb shit he says is pointless and counterproductive. I don't even have an issue with highligthing this particular example, as it's a pretty heinous one, but the frequency that outlets cover Jesse Watters in general is what's annoying.
Curious to know if Sinclair or Nexstar? is that it? have any stocks in FOX NEWS. Or controlling interests.Funny you should mention Fox stock. Because it leads to the story of the day when I realized they weren't just biased, they were literally lying to people.
What a dumb fucking overreaction. And Jesse Watters saying inflammatory shit to get a reaction is normal on Fox News whether I post about it or not.
To the other posts pointing out that he has a massive audience, yes he does, and frequently making headlines about the aforementioned dumb shit he says is pointless and counterproductive. I don't even have an issue with highligthing this particular example, as it's a pretty heinous one, but the frequency that outlets cover Jesse Watters in general is what's annoying.
gas? Sounds like something a Nazi would say. Did he let the mask slip completely there?
gas? Sounds like something a Nazi would say. Did he let the mask slip completely there?
What mask?
Dude, you're effectively normalizing stochastic terrorism under the guise of "just trolling bro".Reading the weather report isn't the same thing as advocating for the storm.
Doing that shit in a world where people are losing their livelihood over telling the truth about Charlie Kirk but propaganda networks are allowed to say shit like that consequence free is supremely fucked up.
Then just fucking ignore it then and stop making your annoyance our problem.And here you are making your annoyance my problem. Take your own advice.
Dude, you're effectively normalizing stochastic terrorism under the guise of "just trolling bro"."He's just trolling" adds a disingenuously forgiving connotation to my post. I said he's trolling because I earnestly wanted people to know what Watters' angle is if they're not familiar with him, not because trolling absolves him in any way.
Doing that shit in a world where people are losing their livelihood over telling the truth about Charlie Kirk but propaganda networks are allowed to say shit like that consequence free is supremely fucked up.
And here you are making your annoyance my problem. Take your own advice.My annoyance is with you and I am addressing you. Nobody on this site wrote that article.
My annoyance is with you and I am addressing you. Nobody on this site wrote that article.Hence why you should not be a hypocrite and stop making your annoyance my problem.
Reading the weather report isn't the same thing as advocating for the storm.Indeed. But you seem to care far more about the intent behind the weather report than the storm that's on its way.
Indeed. But you seem to care far more about the intent behind the weather report than the storm that's on its way.This wasn't directed at me but since I'm the one who said "He's trolling", I'll respond that you pose a fair question and the answer is that his intent ultimately doesn't matter and I don't think anybody is making a case for why it does. I was basically saying "Watters intentionally pulls this shit to piss people off" because sometimes I simply want to know what the background is behind a quote regardless of whether it matters or not.
Or to put it another way: If some nutjob went and tried to bomb the UN tomorrow after hearing these comments, what difference does it make whether the comments were "just trolling" or not? Yes, you can argue that a very large degree of fault lies with the person who took the comments seriously and acted on them - but that's true whether the comments were "just trolling" or not.