The sooner foolmo plays scum the better.
Until then I cant really tell if he is being suspicious. I do feel he should know by now that NL is never gonna work.
Meow1000 posted...
Because the very basis of your vote is flawed and cheap.
Honestly I also would not be surprised if Foolmo got a role that benefits from a NLWe have a few players who have contributed absolutely nothing to the game. The NL policy just makes him the easiest target.
Tho it'd be a big coincidence admittedly.
Tho I believe Dumey has more reasons to vote Foolmo than the NL policy.
The sooner foolmo plays scum the better.Death, can you please elaborate what this means?
We have a few players who have contributed absolutely nothing to the game. The NL policy just makes him the easiest target.
Honestly I also would not be surprised if Foolmo got a role that benefits from a NLA role that gains a power specifically on NL when NL never happens going to one of the only people who ever pushes NL
Tho it'd be a big coincidence admittedly.
Tho I believe Dumey has more reasons to vote Foolmo than the NL policy.
This is such a tone deaf argument though. If we were in a perfect world where all players have the same expectations, then yes other players have done less than Foolmo. But these players also have histories and reputations that go along with them. So does Foolmo! I'm not voting Foolmo for advocating for NL. I'm voting him for actively refusing other contributions. Active being the key word as to why I'm inscribing intent.Not really. IGCD for example is using an inherently scummier vehicle to do nothing than Fool is. Fool has been open from the start that he isn't doing jack.
Thus whataboutism to point at players like IGCD is, ironically, cheap.
Death, can you please elaborate what this means?
A role that gains a power specifically on NL when NL never happens going to one of the only people who ever pushes NL
"lol"
Really it comes off as a vote on the obvious easiest target in the entire game rather than a vote that's really trying to push the envelope.
It means that if I see a scum foolmo flip, I will finally have something to compare his townplay to.The only game I remember from him offhand was my SK game.
Of course if I am forgetting a recent scum foolmo game , then egg on my face.
Easier than Corrik or IGCD?Fool's mindset today is something that's inherently considered anti-town and he has been completely unabashed in sharing it.
It means that if I see a scum foolmo flip, I will finally have something to compare his townplay to.Oh i see. You're saying in a total b8 mafia sense, not in a this game sense. Thanks, i was super confused
Of course if I am forgetting a recent scum foolmo game , then egg on my face.
Meow1000 posted...
Not really. IGCD for example is using an inherently scummier vehicle to do nothing than Fool is. Fool has been open from the start that he isn't doing jack.
God this game could use a Lopen
In a vacuum where all players are equal, sure! But IGCD plays this way even as town. Because he has a job that doesn't let him contribute during work and a restrictive schedule. Ignoring conditions like these to compare two players with wildly different situations is silly. Foolmo has been present. IGCD hasn't. Vote for inactivity if you want to, but that's not how I choose to use my vote on deadline day when town has no direction or momentum and I want to push active players to push the game forward.We have no direction or momentum because half the players in the game have done little to nothing.
A role that gains a power specifically on NL when NL never happens going to one of the only people who ever pushes NLThanks for saving me a post
"lol"
Really it comes off as a vote on the obvious easiest target in the entire game rather than a vote that's really trying to push the envelope.
Then maybe players like Blade shouldn't be undermining votes and contributing to the game being in a standstill.Blade is a stubborn person. Blade wants everything to go blades way. It probably makes Blade town in most cases,
I'm bored and poking people because almost nothing has actually happened so far.What gave you the impression of it turning serious? The game doesn't have enough players to go that long again.
We had more content in the first hour or two in the last game than we have so far today.
I think it's because this game was marketed as not serious and then seemingly turned into a serious game. I certainly don't want to be alive on day 9 again.
We have no direction or momentum because half the players in the game have done little to nothing.
Pushing the one player of the pile who's already said he doesn't care and wants to NL just because he's said he doesn't care and wants to NL isn't really moving the needle.
In IGCDs case I would almost ask him if he could use a replace. He did leave a vote and never explained why as far as I can see.
Sultan, I think Wallz first post WAS a joke. It was a Friends reference.
Dumey is currently in a state of "Fuck, i'm going to get lynched if i dont start something on someone"
Foolmo seems like the wrong choice.
Anyhow it's Synagogue timeTell me in fewer words that you haven't read the game, buddy.
##Vote: Peaf
Feels like he's holding back compared to last game and that he doesn't really care who gets lynched.
Also I feel like town Peaf votes me by now with how many times he's dropped shade on me.
Sbell pls. I am active in every game I play and try to be a leader when I can. Forgive me for trying to push in literally any direction when I woke up this morning and the only new posts were Wallz giving reads, and people complaining about lack of votes.
i just think that foolmo was the wrong choice, thats all.
do you truly think his No Lynch stance on Day 1 is coming from him being scum?
This is such a tone deaf argument though. If we were in a perfect world where all players have the same expectations, then yes other players have done less than Foolmo. But these players also have histories and reputations that go along with them. So does Foolmo! I'm not voting Foolmo for advocating for NL. I'm voting him for actively refusing other contributions. Active being the key word as to why I'm inscribing intent.
Thus whataboutism to point at players like IGCD is, ironically, cheap.
Anyhow it's Synagogue time
I'd feel better about that needle drop if it was not timed right as Blade has to go.
do you think his No Lynch stance on Day 1 is coming from him being town?
*looks at calendar*Yeah I'm suddenly feeling a little self conscious about being at work. That's the reform movement for ya i guess
Well shit, its Shavuot... Chag Sameach, friend.
I'm not voting Foolmo for advocating for NL. I'm voting him for actively refusing other contributions. Active being the key word as to why I'm inscribing intent.
Yeah I'm suddenly feeling a little self conscious about being at work. That's the reform movement for ya i guess
Sbell I can already hear how Dumey is gonna react to that question, so let me first ask you a counterquestion.
do you think his No Lynch stance on Day 1 is coming from him being town?