Apparently, the motive of the killer according to Utah official and police interviews is that they didn't think CK was conservative enough. Yet again more right-wing on right-wing violence.
Yes, some information has pointed to the fact that his political commentator of choice is Nick Fuentes, who is about the furthest right you can possibly be and has previously beefed with Kirk for not being far enough to the right. Look into "groyper wars" if you want more details about the confrontational history between their two fanbases.
I wonder how many people on the right will issue an apology now for immediately making comments about how dangerous and violent the left is for inciting political violence? (I do not actually wonder this. I know the answer is zero)
in another fit of politically fueled ragewell sir you seem downright calm
I'll come back and eat crow if I'm wrong about this . Feel free to @ me when definitive news breaks.
oh no, people are responding to the baitfor what its worth i was baiting the bait!
for what its worth i was baiting the bait!I mean I basically am too so fair play
well sir you seem downright calm
What is "this" ?
I'm not sure what your position on this incident even is or what issue you have with our current understanding of Robinson's motive.
Of course this information could all change and if it does I'll adapt to it. But I guess I really don't understand what you are accusing me of. I feel I've been more than fair in my approach to learning information before speculating wildly .
Sorry
I have this flaw where I assume someone would genuinely change their mind about something if only I could explain the situation well enough. I should know from experience by now that this is not an effective use of my time, but here we are.
There's no manifesto and it's been reported that "o bella ciao, bella ciao" was written on one of the unfired casings. While I would have had no clue what that meant before all of this, a quick google search makes it pretty obvious. None of that lines up with your theory.
There's a post one above my op in this thread that felt to the need to call the guy who just got murdered a charlatan and a fraud with no moral character.He was.
A world full of people doing this to one another is a horrible place to live. But yeah, I guess I'm just not calm enough.Where was this energy a couple months back when sitting politicians were assassinated by a Christian Nationalist, and when the President of the United States said that calling the governor of the associated state "a waste of time"?
And they can decide that the percentage must be low enough that people they know who they like must not be radical.That's not logical at all. Even at 50%, you can easily convince yourself that neither you or anyone you know is in that group. Conversely at 1%, you can also convince yourself that you and everyone you know is in that group. Either way you choose whether to be offended or not.
While I would have had no clue what that meant before all of this, a quick google search makes it pretty obvious. None of that lines up with your theory.What is your obvious theory? Post it clearly so we can @ you when you're wrong because right now you're just being vague and yelling at everyone else
Where was this energy a couple months back when sitting politicians were assassinated by a Christian Nationalist, and when the President of the United States said that calling the governor of the associated state "a waste of time"?
Where was this energy when somebody broke in to the then-Speaker of the House's home and assaulted her husband with a hammer while trying to find the Speaker herself?
Where was this energy when it came out that the person that shot at Donald Trump was a conservative?
Well he think our escalating left wing rhetoric is the problem so I dont see any reason to take this guy seriously.I'll latch on to this to offer another reminder that the vast, vast majority of political(-adjacent) violence in this country is perpetuated by right-wing actors against all parts of the spectrum, and that while left-wing violence does exist, the scope and scale of it is massively smaller.
For so many of you, your politics are your morality
"I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage"I have only three words on this quote, by the way.
I'm curious how you add context to "black women lack the brain power to be taken seriously". I'll wait.
You know the strongest evidence we have that the "propaganda" is real, and Charlie Kirk was killed by a right-wing extremist? The one-day flip in reaction from prominent Republicans, going from "The left is responsible for this violent rhetoric and they started this war!" to "Tyler Robinson was a misguided young man and we need to pray for his soul."
here's no manifesto and it's been reported that "o bella ciao, bella ciao" was written on one of the unfired casings. While I would have had no clue what that meant before all of this, a quick google search makes it pretty obvious. None of that lines up with your theory.theawesomestevr posted...
There's no chance that a hardcore Nick Fuentes follower would room with a trans person to begin withyou're just admitting you don't know anything about groypers, 4chan, and Nick Fuentes lmao
he may have even developed some sympathy for trans people via proximity, same way many conservative families suddenly gain a new understanding of trans people when one of their own come out. studies show conservatives have a really narrow field of empathy that doesn't care unless it hits close to them. that doesn't suddenly make him some marxist antifa super-soldier.
Nick Fuentes follower
What is a Groyper?
What is a Groyper?
Okay I feel like I shouldn't ask at this point but I also don't want it in my algorithm if I Google it myself
What is a Groyper?
Even my chronically online ass doesn't know this one
okay so a follow-up questionWhite Supremacist/Holocaust Denier/Misogynist/Homophobic/etc influencer and podcaster who has a following with a silly name.
who is that
...I had to look it up too...Wikipedia to the rescue.Im pretty sure it means I like men but Im very out of touch with the rest of gen z so idk
Still no idea what owo or uwu or whatever the fuck it is means though. That one I'm not looking up.
Im pretty sure it means I like men but Im very out of touch with the rest of gen z so idkits a cutesy anime girl thing that has been used in/co-opted by other contexts
its a cutesy anime girl thing that has been used in/co-opted by other contextslol thats fine, my experience with owo and uwu was my freshman year of highschool, then nobody ever mentioned it again so the true meaning slid into the back of my brain
so uh its not just gen z youre out of touch with