Politics Containment Topic 465: If you post here, you're gay lmao

Board 8

Page of 10
Board 8 » Politics Containment Topic 465: If you post here, you're gay lmao
Bat178 posted...
Apparently, the motive of the killer according to Utah official and police interviews is that they didn't think CK was conservative enough. Yet again more right-wing on right-wing violence.

Forceful_Dragon posted...
Yes, some information has pointed to the fact that his political commentator of choice is Nick Fuentes, who is about the furthest right you can possibly be and has previously beefed with Kirk for not being far enough to the right. Look into "groyper wars" if you want more details about the confrontational history between their two fanbases.

I wonder how many people on the right will issue an apology now for immediately making comments about how dangerous and violent the left is for inciting political violence? (I do not actually wonder this. I know the answer is zero)

I wonder how many of you will apologize and stop regurgitating idiotic propagandists' rhetoric from bluesky (or whatever other godforsaken social media platform you use) when you're inevitably wrong about this just like so many of you have been on nearly every major political event discussed on this board since like Jussie Smollett (honestly, it probably goes back further, but it's not like I was really paying attention back then).

The answer is the same amount of you as have ever taken any measure of accountability and tried to learn from past errors in judgment you've made when you let politics halve your IQ while giving yourselves over to unbridled tribalism. In case you're already mashing the report button in another fit of politically fueled rage that you're too busy to do the math, the answer is still zero.

Seriously, check back on this. Don't be like KP and ltm who spent the days running up to the election calling pollsters with a proven track record Republican propagandists all while citing actual propagandists predicting Kamala's victory as somehow legitimate (lol Anne Selzer and Iowa btw). Actually learn something from your mistakes if you're wrong. And just like I said I would if I predicted the election wrong, I'll come back and eat crow if I'm wrong about this. Feel free to @ me when definitive news breaks.

lol
theawesomestevr posted...
in another fit of politically fueled rage
well sir you seem downright calm
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
theawesomestevr posted...
I'll come back and eat crow if I'm wrong about this . Feel free to @ me when definitive news breaks.

What is "this" ?

I'm not sure what your position on this incident even is or what issue you have with our current understanding of Robinson's motive.

And I say "current understanding" because I am willing to change my position as more information becomes available.

When the event had first occurred I was saying we should wait for more information before trying to guess the 'who' or the 'why'. I also felt that the initial outrage against the "extreme left" was incredibly presumptive and premature. Certainly I understood it was a possibility that someone with liberal leanings might have done it, but to hear Trump, etc tell it they were 100% certain it was left extremism with absolutely no room for doubt.

It wasn't until we actually HAD some information that I said anything other than "let's wait and see". Even then I STILL prefaced it with "some information has pointed to" rather than describing the information as being absolutely confirmed. We have an interview with a grandmother describing the family as MAGA and saying she didn't think they even knew any Democrats and we didn't have that before. We have an image of Tyler dressing up as a Groyper meme for Halloween, we didn't have that before. These are actual indications that Kirk was targeted for not being extreme enough and are both counter indications against the idea that he was operating with some kind of liberal or left wing motive..

Of course this information could all change and if it does I'll adapt to it. But I guess I really don't understand what you are accusing me of. I feel I've been more than fair in my approach to learning information before speculating wildly.
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
oh no, people are responding to the bait
Paratroopa1 posted...
oh no, people are responding to the bait
for what its worth i was baiting the bait!
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
Sorry

I have this flaw where I assume someone would genuinely change their mind about something if only I could explain the situation well enough. I should know from experience by now that this is not an effective use of my time, but here we are.
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
Chaeix posted...
for what its worth i was baiting the bait!
I mean I basically am too so fair play
Chaeix posted...
well sir you seem downright calm

There's a post one above my op in this thread that felt to the need to call the guy who just got murdered a charlatan and a fraud with no moral character. It was definitely urgent to know that this particular poster will not sanctify him or his actions two threads deep in a topic series that has nothing but negative things to say about him (there's also a history with that specific poster flying off the handle at me that I was basically bracing for when posting) . I guess you think that's a totally rational and calm thing to do though.

I get that many of you cannot stand anything other than the total submission of others to your worldview. Anything less and so many of you feel the need to lie, smear their character, and ultimately turn them into a demon - even immediately after they've died. And that treatment is not reserved just for right wingers.

For so many of you, your politics are your morality, so if anyone steps too far outside the opinions you allow which increasingly narrow day after day, they suddenly deserve bad things to come their way. Any bad word someone has to say about the person - no matter how dishonest - becomes treated as truth and must be endlessly repeated. Anything and anyone outside of your worldview is now, by definition, evil, and justifies whatever you say about them.

A world full of people doing this to one another is a horrible place to live. But yeah, I guess I'm just not calm enough.


Forceful_Dragon posted...
What is "this" ?

I'm not sure what your position on this incident even is or what issue you have with our current understanding of Robinson's motive.

I think there's at best a 5% chance your belief of him shooting a dude in front of a crowd while it's recorded was because he thought his target wasn't extreme enough is correct. I'll give it less than 1% it's -insert conspiracy here- and the remaining % is that it's exactly what it obviously appears to be from the outset. There's no manifesto and it's been reported that "o bella ciao, bella ciao" was written on one of the unfired casings. While I would have had no clue what that meant before all of this, a quick google search makes it pretty obvious. None of that lines up with your theory.

Forceful_Dragon posted...
Of course this information could all change and if it does I'll adapt to it. But I guess I really don't understand what you are accusing me of. I feel I've been more than fair in my approach to learning information before speculating wildly .

Yeah, I think there's no way of even charitably interpreting either post I quoted as such. I usually only check these topics out when something major politically happens, and it's become regular at this point that what I see when I enter is people constantly escalating the rhetoric and whipping each other into a frenzy and dehumanizing their political opposition.

I know not all of you are equally guilty of this, but I also tend to see little to no real pushback at any point. And FD, while I don't think you're naturally inclined to being extreme in your rhetoric, you're not someone who's exactly going to go out of their way to oppose it either.

Forceful_Dragon posted...
Sorry

I have this flaw where I assume someone would genuinely change their mind about something if only I could explain the situation well enough. I should know from experience by now that this is not an effective use of my time, but here we are.

I don't expect anyone to genuinely change their mind just because I suggested it which is why I went out on a limb a year ago and am going out on one now. Making predictions and reflecting on them when you get them wrong is a good way to both hold yourself accountable and remember you're human; you get things wrong and you aren't omniscient. And by "you," I'm obviously not talking about you specifically. It does nothing though obviously when you forget them immediately after you've made them and you never really care if you have things right or wrong.

This isn't bait btw. Pretty sure Para always says this anytime someone dares to post any kind of dissent in these topics. 99% sure he did the same thing last year which I'm pretty sure was the last time I posted in a politics topic. Wouldn't shock me at all if he's reported each of my posts already.
theawesomestevr posted...
There's no manifesto and it's been reported that "o bella ciao, bella ciao" was written on one of the unfired casings. While I would have had no clue what that meant before all of this, a quick google search makes it pretty obvious. None of that lines up with your theory.

Also, forgot to mention that if there's any truth to him having a trans roommate that would immediately sink your theory. There's no chance that a hardcore Nick Fuentes follower would room with a trans person to begin with, let alone be totally cool with living with them while somehow simultaneously just not being able to take Charlie Kirk being a little too pro-Israel.
i just thought it was funny that you sounded angry while talking about others raging but then i got multiple paragraphs in reply so maybe youre not as calm as you believe

im just here to shitpost. not even american.
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
theawesomestevr posted...
There's a post one above my op in this thread that felt to the need to call the guy who just got murdered a charlatan and a fraud with no moral character.
He was.

You dont get to get glorified just because you died in a tragic fashion.

Charlie Kirk was a gross, evil man.

He believed women have no place in society outside the home, where they are to do nothing but serve a man. He repeatedly glorified and downplayed violence against those he disagreed. He justifies children being an acceptable loss for guns while pretending to be pro life.

We dont even need to get into the "normal" right wing nonsense.

He was not a good person. Nothing that happened or gets revealed or doesn't will change that.
The other thing is, regardless of the individual motive of the shooter, the shooting was enabled by the USs gun culture and complete lack of regulation enabled by the right. Want to prevent things like this? Do something about guns.
I just decided to change this sig.
Blaaaaaaargh azuarc
Given who controls the investigation, we'll only find out about the real motive if it meets the needs of their agenda. Otherwise, this will be swept under the rug like the other recent political killings (successful or otherwise).
"That was unnecessarily dramatic". - NY Mets motto (courtesy of InnerTubeHero)
Congratulations to azuarc, the guru of gurus and winner of GotD 2020!
theawesomestevr posted...
A world full of people doing this to one another is a horrible place to live. But yeah, I guess I'm just not calm enough.
Where was this energy a couple months back when sitting politicians were assassinated by a Christian Nationalist, and when the President of the United States said that calling the governor of the associated state "a waste of time"?

Where was this energy when somebody broke in to the then-Speaker of the House's home and assaulted her husband with a hammer while trying to find the Speaker herself?

Where was this energy when it came out that the person that shot at Donald Trump was a conservative?
If your politics don't follow your morals then you must have none
~Peaf~
Charlie Kirk was in fact an evil human being. It would take someone who themselves is evil to have agreed with him on his stances. This is just basic human decency.

Also I have no idea who you are lmao.
https://youtu.be/d2qp2scgc_4?si=7k54z8xFv75JQ9ya
https://youtu.be/qj9p6IFSlnk?si=cZ5L4OPM0TjVjwCD
HeroicCrono posted...
And they can decide that the percentage must be low enough that people they know who they like must not be radical.
That's not logical at all. Even at 50%, you can easily convince yourself that neither you or anyone you know is in that group. Conversely at 1%, you can also convince yourself that you and everyone you know is in that group. Either way you choose whether to be offended or not.

The essence of Trumpism is that you must ALWAYS choose to be offended. You must treat offense as violence, and use it justification to escalate into real violence. The 2016 campaign was about training Trumpers to do this at all times.
_foolmo_
he says listen to my story this maybe are last chance
theawesomestevr posted...
While I would have had no clue what that meant before all of this, a quick google search makes it pretty obvious. None of that lines up with your theory.
What is your obvious theory? Post it clearly so we can @ you when you're wrong because right now you're just being vague and yelling at everyone else

Also it's cute that you think trans white supremacists don't exist
_foolmo_
he says listen to my story this maybe are last chance
Well he think our escalating left wing rhetoric is the problem so I dont see any reason to take this guy seriously.
https://m.twitch.tv/sorozone/profile
Looking at all the tangential things invoked to shame people and cast aspersions here, I can understand theawesomestevr's affinity for the rhetoric of Charlie Kirk and Ezra Klein.
"God Hand is the ultimate expression of the joy of humanity, specifically the punching part of the joy of humanity."-Shigeru Miyamoto
Reg posted...
Where was this energy a couple months back when sitting politicians were assassinated by a Christian Nationalist, and when the President of the United States said that calling the governor of the associated state "a waste of time"?

Where was this energy when somebody broke in to the then-Speaker of the House's home and assaulted her husband with a hammer while trying to find the Speaker herself?

Where was this energy when it came out that the person that shot at Donald Trump was a conservative?

Until these questions are answered, nothing the cold storage alt has to say will ever hold any relevance.
https://imgur.com/gOGzcN4
Sorozone posted...
Well he think our escalating left wing rhetoric is the problem so I dont see any reason to take this guy seriously.
I'll latch on to this to offer another reminder that the vast, vast majority of political(-adjacent) violence in this country is perpetuated by right-wing actors against all parts of the spectrum, and that while left-wing violence does exist, the scope and scale of it is massively smaller.

This is true both historically and recently. And all indications are that it is, once again, true this week.

There's a reason that the FBI, a very famously left-wing organization (/s), is on record saying far-right domestic terrorism is one of the biggest threats in the country in the past few years, and said that during Donald Trump's first term.

The scale's just absolutely not comparable. And anybody who pretends they are is either horrifically uneducated, actively trying to spread misinformation, or both.
theawesomestevr posted...
For so many of you, your politics are your morality

what a weird way to say the GOP has no morals, but yeah I agree with you
If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person?
#theresafreakingghostafterus
"edit": oops sorry, some of the formatting broke when i posted and it won't let me edit because i think the links are too long for the edit field (but not posting???) I don't know why making all the links start with a "1." fixes it but it does so that's why that's like that.

Well, if the collective "we" are being accused of lying about Kirk I guess "we" might as well bring out the receipts.I can't take credit for this compilation, though I did do some research on my own on some alternate sources. Tried to diversify the sourcing as much as I could so it's not all just one or two places. Ranges from Media Matters all the way to Newsweek and the ADL to show that across the entire spectrum this was being reported on for years.

Note this is not at all exhaustive and I'm leaving a lot off the table here that I could add. Both within the subtitles I have here and entirely new ones that I feel have probably gotten enough play that I don't need to include them (like the whole "it's worth gun deaths to have the second amendment" one that's made the rounds a lot and the "I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage" one.) Like there could be a whole section on Gaza, Abortion, and Misogyny.

Kirk, calling for deaths and public executions:

  • Called for Biden to receive "the death penalty for his crimes against America"
  1. https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-joe-biden-should-be-put-prison-andor-given-death-penalty-crimes-against
  • Advocated for televised public executions and suggested that children should be forced to watch them as "an initiation."
  1. https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-death-penalty-public-executions-1873073
  • Called for "Nuremberg-style trials for every gender-affirming clinic doctor."
  1. https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-we-need-have-nuremberg-style-trial-every-gender-affirming-clinic-doctor


Kirk, calling for use of lethal force against immigrants:

  • In addition to lethal force, said we should use whips against them and saying, "Why is that controversial?"
  1. https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-calls-shooting-and-whipping-migrants-southern-border-if-you-enter-we-have
  • Called immigrants "an enemy occupation of the foreigner hordes" and required armed resistance
  1. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/turning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024


Kirk, calling for violence against the LGBT+ community

  • Wanted physical, violent confrontations with transgender athletes
  1. https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-has-history-violent-and-bigoted-rhetoric-he-was-first-guest-california
  • Called transgender individuals "an abomination" and "a throbbing middle finger to God"
  1. https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/we-must-not-posthumously-sanitize
  • Called for returning to historical persecution of LGBTQ people, "the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s and 60s"
  1. https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-has-history-violent-and-bigoted-rhetoric-he-was-first-guest-california


Kirk, expressing white supremacy views, anti-black racism, and antisemitism:

  • Called George Floyd "a scumbag"
  1. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859
  • Called the Civil Rights Act "a huge mistake"
  1. https://www.wired.com/story/charlie-kirk-tpusa-mlk-civil-rights-act/
  • Called MLK "awful" and "not a good person."
  1. https://www.wired.com/story/charlie-kirk-tpusa-mlk-civil-rights-act/
  • Racial prejudice: Said, "If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, 'Boy, I hope he's qualified.'"
  1. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs
  • Claimed the "Great Replacement" was "not a theory, it's a reality" and that Democrats are trying to "diminish and decrease white demographics in America"
  1. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/mar/01/facebook-posts/undocumented-immigrants-are-not-proof-of-a-scheme/
  • Said that "native born Americans are being replaced by foreigners" and that Trump would "liberate" the country from "the enemy occupation of foreigner hordes."
  1. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/turning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024
  • Promoted the antisemitic conspiracy of Jewish people controlling everything, saying "not just the colleges; it's the non-profits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it"
  1. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa
  • Blamed racial tension on Jewish donors who were actively promoting it, saying, "The philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has largely been funded by Jewish donors in the country."
  1. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa


Kirk, conducting harassment campaigns:

  • Created the "Professor Watchlist" which resulted in death threats, antisemitic harassment, and more against educators
  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor_Watchlist
  • Launched a harassment campaign that the Arizona State University President confirmed led to antisemitic, anti-LGBTQ, and misogynistic attacks on ASU faculty
  1. https://www.statepress.com/article/2023/11/turning-point-response-overview


Kirk, just generally normalizing violence as a political response:

  • Attacked small-d democratic legitimacy by systematically describing Democratic governance as illegitimate
  1. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-hateful-rhetoric-connects-to-real-world-violence/
  • Study by Cambridge Core researcher finding that Kirk's rhetoric contributed to the rise in offline political violence
  1. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods/article/violent-political-rhetoric-on-twitter/8BCBD1F909A861589D93F7124AFE1A7E
May you find your book in this place.
Formerly known as xp1337.
But Thorn, that man was murdered which means none of that is actually bad, right?

"Bordate is a pretty shady place, what with the gangs, casinos, evil corporations and water park." - FAHtastic
Thorn posted...
"I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage"
I have only three words on this quote, by the way.

Gustave Mark Gilbert
You know a man must have been a paragon of virtue when even Fox News, praising him as a martyr, refuses to actually air anything he said, and actually gets mad at people for quoting him as "twisting his words".

They won't say how the words are being twisted, though. They'll say it's out of context, and if you ask the context they'll refuse to answer and keep redirecting.

I'm curious how you add context to "black women lack the brain power to be taken seriously". I'll wait.
https://youtu.be/d2qp2scgc_4?si=7k54z8xFv75JQ9ya
https://youtu.be/qj9p6IFSlnk?si=cZ5L4OPM0TjVjwCD
You know the strongest evidence we have that the "propaganda" is real, and Charlie Kirk was killed by a right-wing extremist? The one-day flip in reaction from prominent Republicans, going from "The left is responsible for this violent rhetoric and they started this war!" to "Tyler Robinson was a misguided young man and we need to pray for his soul."
Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier.
Inviso
UshiromiyaEva posted...
I'm curious how you add context to "black women lack the brain power to be taken seriously". I'll wait.

he was just trying to sleep with a black woman
http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/B8%20Girls%202012/pjbas.png
Inviso posted...
You know the strongest evidence we have that the "propaganda" is real, and Charlie Kirk was killed by a right-wing extremist? The one-day flip in reaction from prominent Republicans, going from "The left is responsible for this violent rhetoric and they started this war!" to "Tyler Robinson was a misguided young man and we need to pray for his soul."

https://bsky.app/profile/ditzkoff.bsky.social/post/3lyo34akwjc2m
https://youtu.be/d2qp2scgc_4?si=7k54z8xFv75JQ9ya
https://youtu.be/qj9p6IFSlnk?si=cZ5L4OPM0TjVjwCD
theawesomestevr posted...
here's no manifesto and it's been reported that "o bella ciao, bella ciao" was written on one of the unfired casings. While I would have had no clue what that meant before all of this, a quick google search makes it pretty obvious. None of that lines up with your theory.
theawesomestevr posted...
There's no chance that a hardcore Nick Fuentes follower would room with a trans person to begin with
you're just admitting you don't know anything about groypers, 4chan, and Nick Fuentes lmao

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/8/819182fd.jpg

yes, they're fucking nonsensical wierdos who live in satirical contradictions and nonsense, yes this includes bella ciao

https://open.spotify.com/playlist/0ais7KJXx8Gyd0hsrbakKW

the idea that only a radical leftist would listen to bella ciao is just cluelessness on your part - whatever the final reveal of this all is, you're jumping to facts you want just like anyone else.

and yes, trans people who grew up on 4chan are verrrrry much still a thing and can also be very normalized to the same sewage as the rest of that place - if the reddit holds up that this is the trans redditor, the part about 4trans is also confirmed about them

this isn't me saying the shooter aligns with mainstream conservativism. but his upbringing, how much he relies on memes even so far as all the casing writings, he's a hodgepodge chronically online nutter and the roommate being a 4tranner doesn't take away from the Fuentes connections one bit

he may have even developed some sympathy for trans people via proximity, same way many conservative families suddenly gain a new understanding of trans people when one of their own come out. studies show conservatives have a really narrow field of empathy that doesn't care unless it hits close to them. that doesn't suddenly make him some marxist antifa super-soldier.

people who go out and commit a public assassination are not rational coherent actors
http://gmun.moe/ffcc
GuessMyUserName 's account's very own account!
https://i.imgur.com/JMOEqnL.jpeg
And I will strive with all my power to reach the 8th and final square
Grimlyn posted...
he may have even developed some sympathy for trans people via proximity, same way many conservative families suddenly gain a new understanding of trans people when one of their own come out. studies show conservatives have a really narrow field of empathy that doesn't care unless it hits close to them. that doesn't suddenly make him some marxist antifa super-soldier.

Exactly, and a not insignificant amount of people have been publicly homophobic before later being revealed to be a closeted homosexual. Having a trans roommate or trans partner doesn't disqualify him from being influenced by Fuentes. You honestly have to be so dialed in to that culture to be a Groyper for Halloween that it's hard for me to not view that as one of his strongest influences.

But again, the exact details surrounding Robinson don't change one things about the kind of person Kirk was prior to his death. That was a good post from Thorn with those receipts and here's another one, a deep cut. Back in 2015 one of Kirk's original anti-DEI takes was to declare that when he applied to attend West Point he spot was given to someone of a different race and a different "gender persuasion". Not based on any information of course, just his belief that the only reason he would have been denied was some kind of inherent racial bias. It comes up within the first few 3 or 4 of this video:

https://youtu.be/ihaMOHCVYsQ?si=dKnXkHwZCIMB44pp

He later backtracked and called it a "joke", but feel free to watch that and let me know if you think he was joking.
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
Okay I feel like I shouldn't ask at this point but I also don't want it in my algorithm if I Google it myself

What is a Groyper?

Even my chronically online ass doesn't know this one
If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person?
#theresafreakingghostafterus
FFDragon posted...


What is a Groyper?
Nick Fuentes follower
FFDragon posted...
What is a Groyper?

Here's what you need to know.

https://youtu.be/ptbwAg5Kt2M?si=eZo9nkMiLnHpr0E0
https://youtu.be/d2qp2scgc_4?si=7k54z8xFv75JQ9ya
https://youtu.be/qj9p6IFSlnk?si=cZ5L4OPM0TjVjwCD
okay so a follow-up question

who is that
If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person?
#theresafreakingghostafterus
take kanye west and put him in a white 20-something body, remove his musical ability and plop him onto /pol/
http://gmun.moe/ffcc
GuessMyUserName 's account's very own account!
FFDragon posted...
Okay I feel like I shouldn't ask at this point but I also don't want it in my algorithm if I Google it myself

What is a Groyper?

Even my chronically online ass doesn't know this one

...I had to look it up too...Wikipedia to the rescue.

Still no idea what owo or uwu or whatever the fuck it is means though. That one I'm not looking up.
"That was unnecessarily dramatic". - NY Mets motto (courtesy of InnerTubeHero)
Congratulations to azuarc, the guru of gurus and winner of GotD 2020!
FFDragon posted...
okay so a follow-up question

who is that
White Supremacist/Holocaust Denier/Misogynist/Homophobic/etc influencer and podcaster who has a following with a silly name.

Was in the mainstream news at the peak of Kanye West's dipshit arc for being the guy that had dinner with both him and Donald Trump.

Hates Charlie Kirk explicitly for not being right-wing extremist enough for his tastes.
Seanchan posted...
...I had to look it up too...Wikipedia to the rescue.

Still no idea what owo or uwu or whatever the fuck it is means though. That one I'm not looking up.
Im pretty sure it means I like men but Im very out of touch with the rest of gen z so idk
Hello, hello, and welcome to the show
CharmedDrake posted...
Im pretty sure it means I like men but Im very out of touch with the rest of gen z so idk
its a cutesy anime girl thing that has been used in/co-opted by other contexts

so uh its not just gen z youre out of touch with
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
I'll jump back in to say that apparently Fuentes is on the record as saying something like "Sleeping with a [trans woman] doesn't have the same context as it does 20 years because women are not fulfilling their obligations." So yeah, if you think a Fuentes fan wouldn't date a trans woman you don't know how deep the misogyny goes.
"One toot on this whistle will take you to a far away land."
-Toad, SMB3
Oh god damn it of course they're the assholes who commandeered and misused pepe the frog

I am so thankful someone else asked because I've been wondering this myself in my days of lurking this thread lol
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/276a1735.png
http://gmun.moe/ffcc
GuessMyUserName 's account's very own account!
I'm surprised there are gamers who don't know uwu and owo. I see those in usernames all the time.
This isn't funny Dean, the voice says I'm almost out of minutes!
~Alexandra
Here's the biggest split between the two extremist camps right now as far as current events.

Groyper camp: Classic Jewish hating right winger

Kirk camp: also Jewish hating, but pretends to be pro Jew because they want to market off being Pro-Israel

So like foolmo mentioned earlier there is an irrevocable split from an electoral marketing standpoint between these two groups that they were able to get over to put Trump back in office, but likely will have serious difficulty keeping things straight moving into the future.
https://youtu.be/d2qp2scgc_4?si=7k54z8xFv75JQ9ya
https://youtu.be/qj9p6IFSlnk?si=cZ5L4OPM0TjVjwCD
Chaeix posted...
its a cutesy anime girl thing that has been used in/co-opted by other contexts

so uh its not just gen z youre out of touch with
lol thats fine, my experience with owo and uwu was my freshman year of highschool, then nobody ever mentioned it again so the true meaning slid into the back of my brain
Hello, hello, and welcome to the show
Board 8 » Politics Containment Topic 465: If you post here, you're gay lmao
Page of 10