Yord's gonna do something dumb before all this is over. I got that feeling.
Orm I forget if had a super villain name but orm was his actual nameOcean Master is his villain name.
Not to mention the urban legend about it (or was it the Orient) that was haunted. What happened was a girl either stood up or hand her hands up in the air while the ride was in motion, and was killed. Since then, it's been said she haunts the ride.That's the Timberwolf. A girl in the 90s tried to change seats mid ride. Which isn't a great idea.
Justin Hammer still a major villain in Iron Man comics todaay?Hammer has been dead for like 24 years. Even being the villain of Iron Man 2 didn't bring him back.
Yeah. Iron-Man's main thing is his villains don't really ever have a consistent identity. Iron Monger, Crimson Dynamo, Titanium Man, etc., all have like 6 people each that wore the armor lol.I actually think Crimson Dynamo is at like 13 now. It makes me want to automatically give it to Madame Masque because she's at least the same person.
The only one who's consistently popped up in Iron-Man stories throughout the years is the Mandarin.
Doomsday is a non-character lolYeah the issue with the Doomsdays and the Banes of the world is they do one big thing once and then they don't know what to do with them ever again. Because anything you do after killing/maiming a super hero is gonna feel very underwhelming. This is especially true for functionally mindless characters like Doomsday, but even Bane spent years just being an occasional physical challenge for Batman, but generally not a threat. It wasn't until Secret Six where he got a pretty significant reinvention and moved him away from Batman before he started to become a compelling character again.
Nightstalkers and Cazadores are also weird-science experiments, the latter having become one of the series' most iconic (or at least infamous) monsters since NV released.Cazadors are just plain more dangerous. Nightstalkers never felt like particularly dangerous enemies to the same degree. Cazadors are second only to Deathclaws in generating an "oh shit" reaction.
I always wondered why nightmarish rattlesnake-coyote hybrids didn't make an impression on the fandom the way Cazadores did. Probably because Cazadores are directly in the path of every new player's 'fuck you main quest I go wherever I want' route once they leave Goodsprings, so they get the benefit of making a hell of a first impression.
Can you explain. Which were east and westThe East Coast is what you see in 3 and 4. Settlements are few and far between, tech is sparce. Nothing really approaching unified government. Just a lot of various scavenger groups.
I only ever played 3 and 4
Also no deathclaw is lame
It told an original story within the continuity of the existimg world keeping the same look and feel.Yes and no. It did a good job of keeping the look and feel of the East Coast Bethesda games. But the problem is that is a very different look than the West Coast games had, which were more post-post-apocalypse.
I would imagine it's more because the gaming and gamer bubbles have grown to include more casual players and games. And I'm not using casual in a negative sense, I mean more like accessibility.This is my thought. I wouldn't be shocked if there are actually more thinking game enjoyers than ever, but that the video game audience as a whole has increased making them a smaller percentage of it.
I stopped watching CW a long time ago but it is sad.I mean CW had largely ceased being a teen drama channel by 2012 where it mostly became a genre TV channel focusing on sci-fi and fantasy. Even Shows that you would think would be straightforward teen dramas like Nancy Drew and Riverdale were fantasy shows.
It was pretty much THE channel for teen dramas. Wasn't really my thing but some of the shows on their were enjoyable and I do have to wonder, where will the teenage demographic get their content from now?
What I am saying is that, for most viewers, I don't believe there is four hours of worthwhile material to be had from the subject matter.I won't say that the video couldn't benefit from some additional conciseness, but it largely used its run time well. It definitely isn't a casual dive into subject. It's probably the most extensive look at the hotel and it's experience. It definitely isn't for everyone but it is good to have really in depth views of now defunct experiences, that few got to have to begin with.
Basically my take is I'd rather a few hour long videos over the year than one four hour video once a yearThis is exactly how I feel about it. Except I'm okay with those episodes dropping all at once too. But I just like having episodes.