Imagine hating on a good cinematic trailer and saying a game will be a flop lol. Yall are out of your minds right now.In what universe was that a good cinematic trailer? If you had said it was some random pump and dump mobile game ad, I'd have believed it. It has all the charm of Forspoken's "out of touch older person writing teen dialogue" shit.
Its like DAO was so near and dear to your hearts that nothing else since then is allowed to come out in the series.
Folks who sail the high seas being upset when their sailing is inevitably eventually curtailed by official outlets always gets me. Like yall had to see this coming eventually right? This had to be an expected outcome...In the past, companies generally didn't go this hard unless the outlet was overtly trying to make money. Nintendo is going stupidly hard on this after their win against the emulator (which was valid due to them making money off it), and I don't really know why. It's the same shit they did with Youtube and their dumb partnership program. It's just a bunch of unnecessary hassle that's not going to do anything other than make them look like hardasses.
Seems like a pointless distinction with no particular set definition, other than trying to separate religions by age.
Again, please stop using that term. New Religious Movement is the proper term for non-subversive "cults"
No, you're talking about a new religious movement (NRM) A cult is a religion, political group, self-help/self-empowerment group, or multi-level-marketing group with an infallible, unquestionable, charismatic leader that demands control over its members, isolates its adherents from society, and shun members who displease the leader.Not all cults are religious, but all religious cults are really not much different than proper religions. The major religions are just too broad to categorically be called cults, but their influence can lead to the same conditions in small communities. When you narrow down to just congregations, they can act in the exact same way as small cults. There's really no proper divide for when a religious cult is considered a full religion. Scientology is definitely both at this time.
I'm glad.There are a number of similar videos that are meant to be actually serious, presumably, but they give rather horrible design advice. These are extreme, silly parodies that have taken a life of their own due to their popularity from the looks of it.
I keep seeing these but I don't really get it, guess I'm a boomer ._.
This is false and Im not sure why you are so hung up on this line of attack towards me.Because your stance is basically the same thing as telling a man in a relationship with a trans woman that he "isn't straight," but your weird righteous indignation prevents you from seeing how hypocritical you are.
Some self examination is probably in order, I imagine. Thats on you though - I cant do that work for you.
No, this is false and actually harmful to progress for equal rights and social equality.None of that has to do with personal attraction. You are trying to dictate people's personal sexuality. That is no less gross than telling anyone else that their sexuality is wrong. The whole super straight thing was really cringy and unnecessary, but there are different ways to define "straight." It's up to each person to define themselves.
Combating bigotry and racism, homophobia, prejudicial discrimination are vital to improving society, as well as inequality as it relates to wealth and class.
The difference is people learning to unpack their prejudices and set a good example for others, rather than double down and perpetuate more bigotry and harm, to their friends, peers, children, etc.
Lots of people have subconscious bias, racist ideas, so on and so forth. That doesnt make them bad people because of how society shaped them. Whats important is they grow as people and be a good ally and citizen.
Trans people, for a closer example, grapple with internalized transphobia and that can be a big mountain to climb. Others, like Caitlyn Jenner or Blair White, perpetuate transphobia while being trans themselves.
So, this is another example of transphobia. Nobody is saying you have to date someone youre not attracted to or that you are being forced to be attracted to someone.Saying it's transphobic not to be attracted is dictating other people's sexuality, and that is gross. It's very possible that someone who otherwise might be attracted and willing to be with a trans person is held back by such beliefs, but that's a person by person scenario and that is their own personal journey. This broad idea that it's inherently transphobic is bad.
I mean they kind of do if said people are not allowed to review the materials of the trial via third party sources so again you provided no damn answer.The point is that it's an irrelevant question. Whether someone sees the details of the trial or not, nearly everyone in the country is going to have some bias for Trump, for or against him, so even one fan of him getting onto the jury could lead to a hung jury. That's what the OP is implying, as far as I can tell. In a perfect world, everyone would be impartial, but I don't think it's possible to guarantee.
Not really an answer thereThe details of the trial don't really matter if someone with preconceived notions of the defendant is allowed onto the jury, and, given the defendant, that's a pretty hard ask. Even if the juror states that they can remain impartial, that's not necessarily true. I assume they'd do things like comb social media to check for major biases (assuming that's allowed), but you could still easily get someone who claims they'd be impartial while not actually being impartial. Properly filtering that out is probably a near impossible task.
Arent like jurors restricted from looking up any information on the case they are actively on the bench for?The ability to find a group of 12 completely impartial people on such a large and prolific trial would probably be like finding 12 specific grains of sand on a beach. The only real thing they need to hope for is that they didn't pick from the greasy, gross red sand.