Lurker > hmnut7

Harassment is always bad. To my knowledge I have never seen it at the gym.

They were all perfectly fine games, that fell short of their potential, and fell dramatically short of what was promised.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

You're not asking me, but I want to jump in.

Do I have a problem taking a first date to McDonald? YES. I have a problem taking them to specifically to McDonalds because of the setting, it is not romantic, it is not conducive of having a nice meaningful conversation, there are usually lots of kids and teenagers running around. And it is not a special or memorable setting.

However would I take a first date for a cup of coffee and/or ice cream and then go for a walk in the park. ABSOLUTELY! That sounds like an awesome First Date. And that would cost half as much as a McDonald's meal.

LightningThief posted...

That's not valid at all.

I want to reiterate again (just in case) I'm not claiming most woman are like this. So I hope no one takes my post and digs into that.

I'm just making the point that a first date to something cheap and easy is perfectly fine. As some (both men and woman) have these absurd expectations for a first date to "impress."

It is not valid to act like an entitled person on a date expecting someone to take you some expensive or even higher end resteraunt. It's a first date to see if you two want to get to know each other further. Same to thinking someone needs to put in a ton of consideration into the first date to go somewhere thatll impress, dazzle or surprise you. It's a first date.

The point of a first date is to get to know each other.

Exactly....

Let's call a thing a thing. This is the move of a "gold digger"

The video is likely fake, but pretending it is real (because there are people who think this way) the problem isn't her that she doesn't like Shakeshack it's that she very clearly is saying the problem is how much money he spent on the meal, actually asking to see the receipt.

If dating is about getting to know each other, what does it matter if he spent $5, $50 or $500, especially on a first date.

All you are entitled to on a first date is to get to know the other person. If what you care about most is how much money they spent... well there is a word for people like that, something close to silver miner.

LightningThief posted...

Maybe I'm ignorant here, but what exactly is the downside to becoming a virgin again? I can't think of anything honestly in a practical sense for a man.

I'll take the easy 500.

LightingThief: What's the downside
TC: You become a virgin.
LightingThief: But how does that effect you
TC: You'll be a virgin.
LightingThief: But what is the actually problem with that.
TC: The fact that you are a virgin.

Get $500 and I get to experience sex for the first time all over again.

Sign me up.

I hope it's fake. If not she is a super bitch, and he is an idiot for sitting there.

The main reason I think it must be fake is... I'm assuming he didn't blind fold her, take her someone place, sit her down and then present the food. "Surprise we're at Shakeshack."

He had to walk her to Shakeshack, she saw the sign on the door, she saw the menu. She was okay with the order. And then when the food arrived she suddenly has an outburst?

Why did she wait until the food was in front of her to complain?
And when she started to complain why did he just sit there and take it. Either leave or tell her to leave. "You don't want to eat this food, you don't have to, I paid for it. Bye Felicia"

Tucker's shopping video is utter bullshit huh.....

So how is it different than any other video he's posted?

SpawnShadow posted...

Usually, but with how much trans people are being demonized lately, I can easily see a politically-motivated judge showing leniency during sentencing or the charges being decreased from murder to manslaughter because of nonsense claims from the defense (as happened to Harvey Milk's killer, thanks to the original "Twinkie defense") as a result.

Sadly I fear this is the case too.

It's the deep south and the teens own family rejected him. What are the odds of getting 12 strangers from a small town in South Carolina feeling sympathy for a trans teenage.

Real talk

First, if his research really found this he should explain why his research is wildly different than literally every other piece of research on the subject.

Second, I call bullshit on he needed an armed guard. Maybe if he was a public figure on TV shouting to an all black audience "Police wouldn't shoot you if you didn't break the law" then I'd be like yeah everyone would be trying to kill him.

But he's a boring Economic professor who wrote a dump paper. I'm sure fellow academics were piss. And it probably got posted online and got to some listical and some more people were pissed. But so pissed that he had to walk around with armed guards... give me a freaking break. No one cares that much.

Last, this could count as "Whataboutism" but it's not, but Fryer was suspended from his job because 5 different women accused him of sexual harassment. Sort of doesn't matter, but it does because these women were research assistants, and even after the suspension was over he was not allowed to have research assistances.

This wouldn't be relevant EXCEPT he makes a point of saying his had two sets of research assistances to confirm the data of this report. OH... you mean the same type of research assistances you were trying to bang... my dude your "research methodology" isn't exactly above board.

Basically, this is a suspect dude, making a suspect claim, under suspect circumstances.

It would be harder (but not impossible) for hate groups to organize and recruit new members. So that specific part of violence might be less... might

UnfairRepresent posted...

Better than Better Call Saul?

I have not seen Better Call Saul, so I will not say it is better or worse.

But regardless, the Practice is an amazing law show, especially when talking about stuff like this. From what I remember of Breaking Bad Saul IS a scummy lawyer protecting scummy clients, he is the stereotype of ambulance chancers and corrupt lawyers basically helping their clients BREAK the law.

The Practice the lawyers are doing it but to protect the rights of everyone, not saying they are white knights, but they put the idea of what Defense Attorneys do in a more positive light.

Aw screw it, if you've got two minutes watch this scene
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XOVq2zKRpA

It's good but not even the best/my favorite on how the show champions that it's important EVERYONE has a good lawyer. even the worst criminal scum in the country are entitled to a zealous defense.

I meant there are YouTubers who promote it talking about how great it is, but Magic Spoon sponsors those channels.

When a YouTuber who is not sponsored by Magic Spoon talks about it they consistently say it is trash.

The promise that you cant tell the difference between Magic Spoon and your favorite childhood surgery cereals, but with Magic Spoon its No sugar or carbs or any other bad stuff.

If that was true Id pay more. but every non-sponsored review Ive ever heard has rated it from bland to horrible.

High price and bad taste, no thank you.

WalkingPlague posted...

no, because she slept with ex-mayor willie brown. he pulled strings to get her on the city council only to be elected DA of SF, senator can you see a pattern?

anyone who benefitted her political career those legs went up like goal posts.

she had many nicknames in the bay area. i would recommend doing some research.

stop pulling that ERRRR sHe A wOmEn, WoMeN tReAteD bAD! card.

maybe YOU should do research.

Brown was out of office long before Harris was Attorney General, before she was a Senator, before she was VP nominee.

The Mayor of San Fran does not control state and National politics ESPECIALLY decade after he leaves office. She did not get to where she is because of her sex life, and it did not hit the national press when she was tapped for VP because people hate when politicians get ahead because of personal connections.

It got to be national news because the best way to tear a woman down is to slut shame her. The best way to put a woman who is becoming too powerful in her place is to bring up the time in her life when her sex life wasnt pure.

I repeat Harris has made more than her share of mistakes as politicians, but without fail the first attacks against her are to slut shame her.

hockeybabe89 posted...

What she's accomplished deserves disrespect.

We've had two whole women come close to the Presidency and they both suck ass. Misogyny is why we haven't seen more, not why 2 out of 2 suck.

If you want to talk about the problems of Kamala or Hillary as POLITICIANS buckle up because I can go all day. Neither of them are great, neither of them would I put as my first choice President especially not the first Female President.

But when Kamala was nominated to be VP, within HOURS there were articlels and News Talking heads saying she was a bad choice because she slept her way to the top.

Not attacking her for a job as senator, Not attacking her for job as a prosector, Not attacking her because she wasn't even the best black woman in the running for VP.... they were attacking her because she was a woman and that means if she was successful it was because she was 'a slut'

It literally turned my stomach.
IT. IS. DISGUSTING!!!!

WalkingPlague posted...

they don't call her 'heels up harris' for no reason.

And the reason is because she's a minority woman, the default of our society is to treat them with disrespect no matter what they've accomplished.

It's disgusting.

darkmaian23 posted...

This always bugs me. Every single TV show portrays defense lawyers this way.

Watch "The Practice" (BTW the best Law ever made, Boston Legal a much dumber show was spun off from it and because it was stupid, it became way more popular).

The Practice was about a small Criminal Defense Law firm, and the premise is they did whatever it took to get their clients off and treated that as 'noble' because the only way to assure the police and prosecutors ONLY convicted the guilty is to give every defendant a zealous defense.

It often dealt with the moral weight it put on the defense attorneys, but it highlighted the importance of their role in a functioning legal system. Seriously best law show ever, tragically underrated.

I would try to encourage her to not take EVERY high profile rich guy sex offender case that walks in her door, someone HAS to defend these guys, but SHE doesn't have to defend ALL these guys.

I would encourage her to donate some of the money from those cases to worthy causes.

And I would encourage her to take on a more diverse client set particularly clients who can't afford a good attorney.

But at the end of the day, she is an adult, she is a lawyer, she has to make her own decisions.

Refund check....
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/d/d314f79c.jpg

I think the idea is Robb Stark was a great general but a bad King.

He did everything right on the battle field but did everything wrong off the battle field.

The 80% off would just be too much fun to pass on.

You could buy $100,000 worth of medicine for $20,000 and sell to a children's hospital for $50,000. You make a huge profit and you still come off looking like a hero

You really thought history nerds larping/cosplaying their favorite moments was just an American thing.

You sweet Summer Child.

pegusus123456 posted...

In fairness to Twilight, vampires in that setting don't actually mature beyond their physical appearance. Edward has been around for a century, but he is still an eighteen-year-old in terms of maturity.

That's not better.

This means any girl he is with either outgrow him or he will turn them into a vampire stopping them from growing.

Like a High School boy who throws his girlfriends acceptance letter in the thrash so she never go to college so she stays with him forever.

I have defended twilight, but it is not defendable. It has countless horrible ideas about relationships. And so so so many concepts that if a male author wrote them for a male audience both the writer and the reader would be #metoo'd (and rightfully so, because the shit is beyond sick).

The men in this series treat the women like utter trash, they are controlling, manipulative, emotionally abusive and worse.... and this is called romantic... by women.

Edward being 100 years old is like the least of the problems.

I view it as the equivalent of "first world problems" in gaming.

It does hurt the immersion in the game, but at the same time unless exploration is a key element of the game you the player is going to want to know how to get to the next objective.

They can improve on the level design, but if everything else is good, I'm okay with short cuts like this.

People can understand what I write, so I have AMAZING hand writing.

Both have their senior moments mentally.

But Biden appears to be in pretty good health physically.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f676e159.jpg

The person who I think is the most obvious I did not see on the list (maybe I skipped him, but if he is here he not mentioned nearly as much as I think he should be).

BILL COSBY

The man was a role model and icon to millions, yet he is serial rapist.

If Cosby died before the rape story hit big there would be monument across the country dedicated to him. Now when he dies people will go to his grave just to piss or spit on him.

In the words of Dave Chapelle "he rapes but he saves, and saves more than he rapes, but he does rape."

Under Biden, the party who tried to overthrow Democracy will not control the White House.

I'm a single issue voter, and that's the issue.

Necronmon posted...

Its going to screw over books and news papers to...humanity is rapidly going to be reduced to only a few sections and its going to suck for everyone but those on the top.

This is true, but this was ALWAYS the direction capitalist society was heading.

Doom with nothing but his armor could take on Superman

Is she hot?

If so tell her "oh you think I'm a young hot guy. Why don't you let me take you out I'll buy you a couple drinks to prove I'm a man not a boy."

If she's not hot, or declines the date, tell her to **** off and stop wasting your time.

While I'm interested in seeing what softball questions Traitor Tucker Carlson will throw at Putin. I will not give him any views.

If anything of value comes from the interview I'm sure a reputable news source will cover it. Let paid professional Journalist take one of the team, they can give him the views and I will give them the view.

Quick someone lock the door, don't let her back in.

MrAntisocial posted...

I don't think the Supreme Court would really entertain the idea of presidential immunity. Even if Thomas and Alito were in favor of it they would remember that Biden is the current president and change their opinion

This is kind of what I don't get with the Trump, MAGA, GOP argument here.

Trumps own lawyer basically admitted that he was arguing the fact that a sitting president should have immunity to have his politically rivals murders.

Joe Biden is the sitting president, you guys are his political rivals and you're arguing that a President should be allowed to murder his rivals.
....
....
....
No one on the right sees a problem.

I hope she pulls through. Wouldn't wish an OD on my worst enemy or their family.

mystic_belmont posted...

I don't what questions this ruling even creates.

This ruling doesn't create new questions it answers the old one... which for everyone save Trump and MAGA was not a question at all.

Question: "Does the president have the right to overthrow American Democracy?"
Answer: "Get out of here with this bullshit and send the guy to jail already"

bigblu89 posted...

I'm starting to think the same.

She realized there's more money in the grift than in being honest and straightforward, and has now become a parody.

Yeah this has been my understanding for a long time now. This comment 100% confirms it for me.

There is no way you can convince me that just off camera there aren't white frat bros, laughing at each other saying they'll pay her another $5 dollar to say all the dumb racist stuff they want to say but would get the crap beat out of them.

tremain07 posted...

Steal country secrets, refuse to give them back, when forced to give them back still manage to hide some.

if this were a non white, non rich person they'd be in Gitmo so fast people would be wondering if they were spirited away in an unmarked van.

Speaks the truth.

America has LITERALLY tortured people for far less.

bluezero posted...

Skyrim: 1
RE4: 0

This