Lurker > Laserion

SGT_Conti posted...

I think it's trolling because it adds nothing to a discussion.

It does if right after, you post the requested information. Or links to it that you got from Google.

But it's better to just say "A quick Google search got me this:"
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

She needs to have a wide uniboob plate. It doesn't uncomfortably flatten her boobs, but also it protects by providing a better impact force dispersion.
Like G1 Arcee.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

assassinCrash posted...

She said "I came to buy school supplies for my little one."

This is pretty obvious context. Why did you doubt what it meant?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Spending $4k a month, my wife and I could last 20 years. We spend less than $4k a month when we're working. Maybe we can hit that mark during summer break.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Mike Xtreme posted...

I don't think you understand how evolution works

Distant_Rainbow posted...

What are the benefits of being able to stare at the sun?

This. How would being able to stare at the sun help someone survive long enough to reproduce, better than someone who can't stare at the sun for long?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

When we married, my wife cooked better than me, but not better than my mom. Now, me and my wife cook better than anyone. Sometimes we even prefer our cooking than something from a restaurant. We also try to copy restaurant stuff that we like.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Intars/Stun phasers/anything that allows you to shoot someone and they drop off just as if you had killed them, but only renders them unconscious instantly.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

* sociopath
* nuclear power
https://orig09.deviantart.net/6179/f/2014/047/5/a/vector_black_mage_color_by_the_penciler-d761xi8.png
https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.enjin.com/1075404/modules/forum/attachments/Explosion-Nuclear-Bomb_1478412016.jpg
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

They think the toilet seat is filthy. So, instead of sitting on it or just wiping it, they hover over it to not touch it. This results in them peeing all over the seat. So of course the seat is now filthy for real. So the next one isn't going to sit on it either.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

not having the time

But you do have all the time in the world! What do you do?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

To not collect taxes at all, you would need to collect a fee at the service point. Every maintained road that you take would have a toll. For your stadium, figure out/estimate how much it costs to build and keep, how long it will last, and how much it will be used by how many people. Divide that, and add it to the cost of tickets. Things like that. Everything will be more expensive, but you don't pay for it in taxes form.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

He was fined $800, and was looking at higher fine if nothing was done. Never started even bagging it. I don't remember the username to @mention. Updates?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

"been knew"? As in the biblical "know"?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

leebul posted...

to further destroy proper grammar with.

with which to destroy grammar further.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

"That person"
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Do you mean "antipasto"?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Smokers spend between $5 & $8 a day in cigs. Since I don't smoke, I figure that $3 a week is OK by comparison. I spent more than that during the fighting arcade games times.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

He was fined $800, and was looking at higher fine if nothing was done. Never started even bagging it. I don't remember the username to @mention. Updates?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

On a similar line: What gives more of an impression of culpability? Being emotionally distressed, or being calm and composed? If you are too emotional, the prosecutor will say that "you are too upset. Is it because you fear we're getting to the truth?" If you are too calm and composed the prosecutor will say that "you are acting too cold and calculating. Like a carefully practiced play."
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Virus731 posted...

More willing to not be a pain in the ass for law enforcement. Guilty parties usually protest innocence while kicking and screaming, while innocent parties usually know that it's not going to help them to protest as it's all evidence based.

That makes sense. I meant more like a group of people surround you and accuse you of something. Makes me want the surrounded person to just accuse the next guy, and if the guy protests, repeat the same line to him: "See, he's denying it, so he is the real culprit, not me!"
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Virus731 posted...

There is a pretty clear difference IMO. Innocent people are more willing because they hope that the truth will come out for them.

Willing to what?

---
On the other hand, if you mean "willing to discuss it rationally", I guess you're right. Sometimes I imagine that if I am wrongly accused of something, I could just "Objection!", "Take that!" and "Hold it!" and show them evidence of how their claims are crap. All while playing some Ace Attorney music from my phone.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

l Dudeboy l posted...

Laserion posted...

Protesting an accusation and defending your innocence is certainly what a guilty party would say. They don't want to get caught.
But it is also what an innocent party would say. They don't want to be falsely accused and unjustly punished.

Sounds like something someone who gets accused of committing crimes a lot would say.

Or someone who sees this an a lot of movies/TV.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Protesting an accusation and defending your innocence is certainly what a guilty party would say. They don't want to get caught.
But it is also what an innocent party would say. They don't want to be falsely accused and unjustly punished.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

KhlavicLanguage posted...

Laserion posted...

What is this lingo?

whose alt is this

Why do you think I'm an alt of someone else? I have alts, but they are all related to my name. X Laserion, Laserion XS, etc., and they are younger than this one, and I neglect them a lot. This is my main account, and my first one. I don't have "everyday for 14 years" karma because I stopped coming around 2008, and started again around 2014, and don't actually come every day.

You on the other hand:

Board User Level25: Novice User
Account CreatedThursday, February 11, 2016 6:04 PM
Last VisitTuesday, August 22, 2017 3:24 AM
Karma45

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Sphyx posted...

Pity they didn't all man up and test their theory while they had the chance.

They can still look at everyday sun. The logic is the same.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Is Kazemon considered an angel Digimon? The visor looks the part.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

What is this lingo?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Sir Will posted...

I guess a distinction would be needed between something with the perfect conditions of earth to just block it out than for planets further away where the sun would be small in the sky a moon could easily block it out as long as it was in the right spot.

Fine. Do the other inner planets have moons?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Tauros posted...

We're probably the only celestial body in the universe that has total eclipses.

According to Celestia, in Jupiter there will be a lot of solar eclipses by Ganymede, Io and Europa before the year ends. I didn't go there in Celestia to check how complete they would be, but there are enough that some of those shadows land fully on land and not off into space.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I'll put the glasses on the lens of the smartphone for a pic.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Why do you have to make so many accounts? Do you get banned a lot? Or do you delete your accounts and make new ones just for the hell of it?
I keep having to delete the tag from your inactive accounts and paste it into your new one.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

My wife showed me that from Facebook.
Animals normally don't care about the sun (except for those that use it for navigation). If my pets don't look at the sun any other day, they won't care to look at it during an eclipse. They don't know that anything interesting is happening up there. Oh, it gets dark? It gets dark every day, and a little bit every cloudy day. Do animals look up every time a cloud blocks the light?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

HIMYM?

Also, dolphin tail makes more sense than fish tail.
And bat-winged Pegasus, instead of bird-winged.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

They already take footprint of babies, right? But no hands.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

GhettoFlip posted...

Then why not just set it in Texas, then? It would have made no difference.

So, if a story calls for someone to be lost in a vast forest for days, but it is filmed in a small park with a woods area only 500'x500', you want them to change it to say that the character got lost in that little square of vegetation?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Those guys don't need to improve their appearance. I was expecting pics of TC with bad clothes and good clothes.for comparison. TC just won't do it. But I have TC tagged as [gimmick], so it doesn't matter.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

We already had much better graphics with smoother appearance in 2015 than in the movie. But still, moving holographic images projected on just air (not smoke) in full color are not a common thing yet.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

littlebro07 posted...

Laserion posted...

Jeff Coatsworth: Do you know what Kobe beef is?
Marshall Eriksen: The most expensive beef in the world.
Jeff Coatsworth: The place I'm taking you has Kobe lobster. That's lobster that is fed on Kobe beef.

I came in here to post this exact quote

*sniffles* Sorry, bro...
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

gunplagirl posted...

And most of the statues don't even include a placard to say who they were or what they did.

Perhaps that is what's needed: leave the statues where they are, but put a placard on them:

This asshole fought to keep people enslaved.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

@R0ttedHorror, updates when you see this. Are you still alive?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Back in CJayC's time, I heard this: The system kept track of what happened to your marks. If you get many marks No-Actioned, your Message Marking Accuracy went down, dropping your marks in priority in the queue. Eventually, if you were a shitty marker, your marks were probably dumped to the very bottom of the queue. Nothing else bad was happening to you, unless you committed violations yourself. Don't know how much of this is still true.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

GhettoFlip posted...

they get a tax break by setting the film in Indiana?

I think you have this backwards. First, the story happens in Indiana. That's how it was written. Period. After that, then you saw "Hey, where are we going to film this?" and look for a suitable place.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

MMA is still a thing. It's a hidden thing now, but it exists.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Are you an heir or something?
"Here you have him!", she tells the three guys with the white van.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

lilORANG posted...

Doe posted...

What's the difference between that and looking at the sun on a normal day?

I think the main issue is that the eclipse makes it dark outside so your pupils will be large. Looking at the sun will cause your eyes to absorb more light but you won't really realize that you are absorbing it because it's dark out.

This. Looking at the sun is dangerous any day, if you do it for too long. But people don't normally look at the sun, because it's too bright, and it's there every day. During eclipses, there is something special to look at, and it's less bright, so you expose your eyes for longer. There is no special additional radiation falling down that day.
And this:
TheDarkCircle posted...

I'm not gonna explain the science behind it correctly but since the sun is so bright, we've developed reflexes to protect our eyes when we stare at it. Its why you squint and all that when you try to look right at it.

With the eclipse, the brightness is greatly diminished because of the eclipse. It's easier to stare directly at it. However, it's still emitting electromagnetic radiation, which is what damages your eyes.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Jeff Coatsworth: Do you know what Kobe beef is?
Marshall Eriksen: The most expensive beef in the world.
Jeff Coatsworth: The place I'm taking you has Kobe lobster. That's lobster that is fed on Kobe beef.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

fenderbender321 posted...

All the feasibly inhabitable locations to live on this planet have been occupied by government. Do you really think there's a place in the world where I can just move to, start building my own irrigation system, power source, roads, etc?

Hmmmm. How legal is it to build a floating island in the middle of the ocean and make it work?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

People still attach prophecies to a big dry rock casting a shadow on a bigger wet rock?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Right here: 18.382336,-65.887286
It was night and rainy. Car facing west, passenger door to the west, she was laying back and I was outside.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".