Lurker > SKARDAVNELNATE

Metalsonic66 posted...

They're both Number One!

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/2/7/AAC4lPAADn9v.png

I mean I meant to do that... the tourist has multiple personalities and is arguing with himself.

Jen0125 posted...

you just want to distract from the toxic American exceptionalism because it's your favorite flavor

The first reply in this topic is me making fun of the tourist.

hera posted...

all the rules are literally right next to it

Dafuq? We are not seeing the same thing.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/1/8/AAC4lPAADn9m.jpg

Look at that first reply.
It essentially says users will be banned for no reason other than they feel like it. Also rules 3-6 are a secret so anything can be a violation.

POS goes to Poland as a tourist and tells another tourist to go back to where he came from

Tourist 1: "Hey you, go back where I came from."
Tourist 1: "But I'm not from the same place as you and have never been there before, thus can't go back there."

Gaawa_chan posted...

I can't even imagine what kind of person would cry over this video, please tell me they're joking. jfc.

It was very moving.

hypnox posted...

she has to find creative ways to make them pass. Which is just crazy to me.

Curve grading that brings the lowest score up to 90 and the good students wind up with a GPA of 500.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io9xTYvfbkk

HornedLion posted...

https://youtu.be/eCytRCKhffs

Are the rules for that game made up on the spot according to who delivers the most dramatic speech?

https://legacyofkain.fandom.com/wiki/HMCS_Bitter
The Bitter area remained undiscovered in the game until a project to recreate Blood Omen in 3D uncovered it in early 2010. Legitimate access to the area was discovered in 2020.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcLNYGzB1Ck

JigsawTDCII posted...

people are just drawn to them and want to be around them

Magnets can also repel.

argonautweakend posted...

snips. so accurate he can circularize dudes from 3 football fields away

Dude is gonna distribute some leaflets over a wide area.

Make a gun based character. Call him Knives.
https://trigun.fandom.com/wiki/Knives_Millions

Jen0125 posted...

Yes because getting killed and resurrecting are two separate events. You can't resurrect without being dead. And to become dead, Jesus was killed.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/4/4/AAC4lPAADngU.jpg

I forget what it was we got into a debate about. They didn't make much of an impression.

Yellow posted...

"it's not christ-like to let yourself be killed", which Jen says is funny because that's exactly what Jesus did.

Yes, but he didn't stay dead. So while he did let them kill him did they really succeed at it?

Jen0125 posted...

The OP is someone who claims to be heavily religious. The first commenter was making a sarcastic comment based on the meme content.

Which is which? The format shown doesn't make sense to me.

Jen0125 posted...

Imagine having such a fundemental non understanding of the lore of your own religion

I'm not sure which you mean siince it's not clear which one is professing a faith and which one is making fun of that faith.

I remember Vista was terrible in a lot of ways and UAC wasn't that high among them.

I don't know. I think we might need something worse than 3rd world to describe the US. In 3rd world countries they have at least solved the problem of finding a place to go poo.
https://time.com/5368610/san-francisco-poop-patrol-problem/

not cool anything tasty

Maybe they can't control themselves enough to eat it slower.

Maybe people already have been removed from the Internet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEn758DVF9I

I'm not interested in multiplayer games.

I'm getting the impression that the people answering "yes" just don't want there to be an internet.

Zareth posted...

Just stomp your feet and clap your hands.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vdeNgGNEGM

No, the internet should be accessible to everyone. At least as accessible as reading books, watching television, or playing board games.

HornedLion posted...

If Vabranium is so fucking indestructible

Did you mean adamantium?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueyMUpESQOo

https://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/1433343090-20150603.png

So what's the name of the company?

What am I looking at? I need a better FOV to make anything out.

I find people only ask that to start a conversation before getting into the actual thing they want to talk about.

I was just thinking that 43rd should have a dunce cap.
Maybe give 42nd a cigar.

BlackScythe0 posted...

You however just choose to ignore the part where he says he's done more than any president before

That's not the part they laughed at. There's 5 seconds and another sentence between saying that and them laughing. Why don't you go further back? Are you sure they didn't laugh at "the extraordinary progress" 12 seconds earlier? Seems to me that if they laughed at the one claim they should have laughed again at the second one.

BlackScythe0 posted...

Trump went before the UN told a stupid lie and got literally laughed at by the entire world.

I tried finding a video to see what lie they laughed at him for.
All I hear is "America's so truth".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nIhBZqZBmQ

ReturnOfFa posted...

Want me to compile a video of Trump gesturing oddly, making mistakes in his movements, and naming non-real countries?

Yes, that would be incredibly entertaining.

ReturnOfFa posted...

how odd that you'd say that but not demonstrate it

I thought I was discussing this with people who were informed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzZzmBh63Ik

Metalsonic66 posted...

Neither are opinions; both are fact

Then it's possible to demonstrate that they are either true or false. Trump had a demonstrably better relationship with reality than the current administration has. How many videos are there of Biden shaking hands with no one?
So this statement of fact must therefore be false and this is fake news.

hera posted...

clear that you purposefully cut out the beginning of that sentence in an attempt to discredit them for some reason

Here's the full paragraph.

At least at first, it was difficult to know what to make of Trumps claim, given his strained relationship with reality. Sure, the former president asserted that the FBI had his passports, but all we had to go on was his word, which has no meaningful value.

Trump having a strained relationship with reality is an opinion.

The FBI confirmed they took his passports.

Trump's word having no meaningful value is an opinion. Another person could say that Trump has more credibility than the FBI due to his reputation of speaking his mind.

"At least at first" implies that the author did figure out what Trump meant. But nothing in the article demonstrates that they had any greater understanding than they started with.

Spoiler It didn't really.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtk85sFV9HU

I'm confused. Is it the complete series or is it only 1 season?

what do those words mean

I assume it's a new limited time beverage.

I interpret this as enthusiastic consent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZhNjmBFRns

1280 x 1024

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/s-s-not-fbi-taking-trumps-passports-rcna43265

What a terrible article. The writer says they'll focus on the merits of the claim yet interject their own opinions. They also admit to not understanding part of the story they're reporting on.

it was difficult to know what to make of Trumps claim

It's clear. He doesn't accept the explanation of the FBI that the passports were taken unintentionally.
He thinks the passports (and other documents not pertinent to the warrant) were taken deliberately.

It would have been a better article if they did stick to the facts about what happened instead of drawing attention to their own confusion.

I'm still upset they discontinued the sweet chili chicken wrap. Also the machine was always broken when they had the white hot chocolate but they kept up the signs for it.

Why are they fighting and or watching? That doesn't seem to fit with many of their personalities.

The only cereal villain thief I actual recall was for Cookie Crisp. I think he was a kleptomaniac and had cereal related OCD.

The Cap'n Crunch Sogies don't want the cereal. They just want to turn the cereal into mush.

In contrast Lucky Charms commercials have the character start with the cereal and children steal it from him. I suspect the children don't have parents, thus why they're foraging the woods for leprechauns.

The Trix Rabbit doesn't actually want to take the Trix away from anyone. He just wants to enjoy it too and I suppose he doesn't buy his own because he's a rabbit and doesn't have money. Also how does he know he likes Trix if it always gets taken away from him before he tries it?

Blightzkrieg posted...

All other differences between sexes remains the same.

Would this create a fairer, less misogynistic society

You stipulated that nothing else changes. Then you asked if anything else changes.

The Sinner
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6048596/

HornedLion posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/7/8/AAckHXAADj5m.jpg

I've never seen a man-made, talking, self-aware snowman. So maybe they did.

Imagine this: As a human you make some snowmen. But there's that one over there that you don't remember making and it keeps changing position on its own, defying everything you know about about snowmen.

Imagine this: As a god you create some humans. But there's that one over there that you don't remember making and it's behaving contrary to how you designed them.

So there is a god, but also your argument is valid. Checkmate... everyone.

Redemption implies I'm going to correct them so I like keeping them around.

Damnation implies I'm going to leave them as they are, just far away from me.

Neither option actually destroys them. As for starting over you can do that independently whatever else you choose.